The name didn't communicate it was about surface state, and it somewhat
confusingly had the name "pending" in it, which could be confused with
the fact that while it's used to collect pending state, it's also used
to cache previously committed pending state.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/907
With the eventual aim of exposing the internals of MetaWaylandSurface
outside of meta-wayland-surface.c, make users of the pending state use a
helper to fetch it. While at it, rename the struct field to something
more descriptive.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/907
This is inspired by 98892391d7 where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.
A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.
No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
Dropping the grab has the side effect that the pointer will be re-picked,
and it might find another surface with a pointer constraint. If that were
the case, the focus change would try to add the pointer constraint before
the now old focus surface released its own.
Just invert these operations, so the constraint is unset before the repick
that might enable another pointer constraint.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/779
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
When Xwayland confines, the surface dimensions will include the server
side window manager decorations. We don't want the decorations to be
included in the constraint region so intersect the calculated input
region with the parts of the buffer rect that is not part of the window
frame.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771859
Put the conditions for enabling a pointer constraint in a helper
function, and use that in both maybe_enable() and maybe_remove(). The
constraint region checking is still only done in maybe_enable()
however.
This changes the conditions for maybe disabling the constraint on focus
change and other trigger points, namely it makes constraints by Xwayland
not disable when they shouldn't due to the constraining window being an
override-redirect window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771859
When the grab is cancelled, for example because of an Alt-tab, VT
switch etc, disable or remove (depending on the constraint type) the
constraint. This avoids a re-entry issue when the focus is returned and
the focus listener tries to re-enable a disabled constraint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771859
Also maybe remove a constraint when the pointer focus changes. This is
needed because when Xwayland has a constraint focus may change, the
constraint object will not receive a 'appears-focused' event on its
window since it never changed.
This happens for example when an override-redirect window (which never
appears focused) holds the constraint, and alt-tab happens. In this case
focus changes, but from the constraint's point of view, none of the
windows it knows about changed its focus appearance.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771345
Since Xwayland surface constraints might need to enable not only
because the constrained window appears focused, add a pointer focus
listener and try constrain whenever the pointer focus changes. It's
still required that a Xwayland window is focused to activate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771050
Xwayland surfaces are special, because there is no reliable way to
associate a window with its corresponding "application window" (the one
which was given focus). Many games that require pointer warping and
confining pointer grabs may for example create override redirect windows
and make that window receive input even though it will never be the
focus window.
Therefore, the requirements for enabling a constraint for a wl_surface
from Xwayland needs to be relaxed in order. This commit changes
Xwayland wl_surfaces to not require being focused to be enabled; it'll
be enabled as long as any X11 window is the one with focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771050
Require pointer focus to enable, otherwise we can't guarantee it has
entered the surface, as the focus may have been given to a subsurface,
override-redirect or other sub window covering the surface that was
requested to have o pointer constraint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771050
For Xwayland, a newly created wl_surface and X11 Window pair may not be
immediately associated, but Xwayland may still request a pointer
constraint on some of its wl_surface's. Handle the situation by
postponing maybe enabling the constraint until the window and surface
has been associated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771050
If a MetaWindow's 'appears-focused' state changed to true, but the
window did not have pointer focus, the constraint did not enable. Thus,
make it possible for the user to also click the window to enable it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
Instead of relying on the keyboard focus surface, use the
'appears-focused' state of the corresponding MetaWindow to determine if
a constraint should enable or not.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
Instead of having MetaWindowWayland having hooks into pointer
constraints subsystem, have the pointer constraints subsystem listen
for the signal itself and enable/disable itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
Instead of having a very large region represent an infinitely large
region, use NULL, and use the calculated input region from the
MetaWaylandSurface if the constraint region was not set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
The when surface->input_region is NULL, it should be interpreted as the
whole surface region. If not, the effective input region is the
intersection of the buffer region and the input region set by
wl_surface.set_input_region. Add
meta_wayland_surface_calculate_input_region() that does this
calculation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
The constraint may be destroyed before the client destroyes the
protocol object, for example if a oneshot constraint was disabled by
alt-tab. Therefore we need to NULL check the constraint in request
handlers and ignore any requests to defunct objects.
The wp_pointer_constraints protocol is a protocol which enables clients
to manipulate the behavior of the pointer cursor associated with a seat.
Currently available constraints are locking the pointer to a static
position, and confining the pointer to a given region.
Currently locking is fully implemented, and confining is implemented for
rectangular confinement regions.
What else is lacking is less troublesome semantics for enabling the lock
or confinement; currently the only requirement implemented is that the
window that appears focused is the one that may aquire the lock.
This means that a pointer could be 'stolen' by creating a new window that
receives active focus, or when using focus-follows-mouse, a pointer
passes a window that has requested a lock. This semantics can be changed
and the protocol itself allows any semantics as seems fit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
