Commit 2f229c3928 removed the code to compute the above-tab
keycode and replaced it with a simple constant from linux/input.h.
We obviously cannot depend on linux headers on non-linux systems,
so provide a fallback definition in that case (which is expected
to work assuming the system is using the Xorg xf86-input-keyboard
driver).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737135
The titlebar rect is in window coordinates, while screen regions are
obviously not. Fix by translating into screen coordinates before
testing for overlaps.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736915
Going through GSD's settings was done in context of patches that
did not land; it is simpler and more consistent with GTK+ to use
the corresponding XSetting instead.
Restacking the frame for a window while unmanaging the window is
harmless, but for undecorated (in particular, client-side-decorated)
windows, this causes problems because the window is typically
destroyed by the client immediately after withredrawing the window.
Skip windows flagged as being unmanaged when assembling the new
stack and when comparing the old order to the new stack.
Add a stacking test for this.
We shouldn't scale the cursor size in mutter we g-s-d exports
the correct size on hidpi so use gtk-cursor-theme-size.
This way we also catch changes on resolution updates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729337
This reverts commit 4fe66ce0a9.
This is wrong ... we should not scale the cursor size but read
the cursor xsettings that gets exported by gsd. Also this won't update on
resolution changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729337
When restacking the last window alone, we would trigger this off-by-one
error. This would throw us off the end of the array, causing lower_below
warnings for nonsensical values.
Since the last window already is lowered below everything else, we
shouldn't need to lower it.
We have a quite accurate view of the X stack, so there's no good reason to ask
the X server to do restacking that has no effect. (Restackings that have no
effect on either X windows or Wayland windows were generally optimized out in
the synchronization code, but in other cases like moving an X window that is
only beneath Wayland windows to the top of the stack we would make such
requests.)
Removing such requests:
- Is a small efficiency win in itself
- Allows us to immediately go ahead and apply Wayland changes to the verified stack
- Prevents queued Wayland changes piling up waiting for an X event that will never
be received, since the X server will not send confirmation of no-op restacks.
Since such operations may still have an effect on the relative stacking of X
and Wayland windows, we need to continue applying them to the local stack.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Now that all actual stack shuffle is handled inside stack-tracker.c, we can make
meta_stack_tracker_record_[raise_above/lower_below] internal to that file and
remove the unused meta_stack_tracker_record_lower().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
stack.c:sync_stack_to_xserver had both code for assembling the desired stack, and
code for enforcing the desired stack on the actual stack of X and Wayland windows;
the latter part is properly the domain of stack-tracker.c; moving the code to
apply the stack there both simplifies it and keeps stack.c more manageable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
There was still code in stack.c to handle skipping override-redirect windows,
but since quite a while ago, meta_stack_add() is not called for OR windows
since they are outside our stacking control. Add an assertion and remove
unnecessary code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
stack.c kept it's own record of the last stacking it requested, so that
restacking could be done with minimal moves, but we already have a better
view of the stacking order with the stack tracker, so use that instead.
This allows eliminating the special case for the first restack.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Since MetaStackTracker is the code that knows about the current X stacking order
and the relationship between X windows and Wayland windows, it's cleaner to
encapsulate stack manipulation in MetaStackTracker rather than have the calling
code make the X calls and only call into MetaStackTracker to inform it about
the changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
The step where we requery the stacking order from the server than combine
it in an arbitrary fashion with Wayland windows can be eliminated by observing
that we are the final authority for Wayland window stacking - so if we
apply each X event that we receive from the X server to our stack in a
way that leaves the X windows ordered in the same way as on the server,
and apply events that we have stored locally in a way that doesn't affect
the ordering of X windows, than we have a fully correct ordering of windows.
Ordering this in the order of first applying the X event and then applying the
local portion also means that as long as we had an up-to-date view of the X
stack the composite operation will be identical to what was requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Putting X windows and pointers to MetaWindows into a union had a number of
problems:
- It caused awkward initialization and conditionalization
- There was no way to refer to Wayland windows (represented by
MetaWindow *) in the past, which is necessary for the MetaStackTracker
algorithms
- We never even cleaned up old MetaStackWindow so there could be
records in MetaStackWindow pointing to freed MetaWindow.
Replace MetaStackWindow with a 64-bit "stack ID" which is:
- The XID for X Windows
- a "window stamp" for Wayland windows - window stamps are assigned
for all MetaWindow and are unique across the life of the process.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Add a private hook for the test framework to get XSyncAlarmEvent events -
this will be used to implement XSyncCounter based synchronization
so that the test framework can deterministically wait until Mutter
has seen actions performed by an X11 client.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
Setting the scaling factor immediately after calling clutter_init()
avoids creating the stage at one size, then later resizing it to
a different size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736279
We can enter weird states where get_default_window is called during
window unmanagement, before the window has been fully removed from
the stack. Make sure these windows are *never* returned from
get_default_window, as focusing them can cause an assertion fail,
or worse.
Clutter events include the layout index codified into modifier_state,
unlike XI2 device events, which means that we need to mask it out so
that we can match successfully.
A lot of applications assume that the window is fully positioned when it
gets the MapNotify, especially simple applications. Make sure that the
window is only mapped through the calc_showing logic.
O-R windows appear in workspace->windows, which aren't relocatable,
so we can't simply check if the workspace is empty after relocating
all normal windows, since those windows remain.
Make sure that the only windows we have are those that are
on_all_workspaces.
This is bad behavior, and can also cause us to get in an infinite loop
if an OR window is mapped and unmapped in quick succession. This
sequence causes a MapNotify followed by an UnmapNotify, and when
processing the events, we'll call XMapWindow, XUnmapWindow, which will
put another set of MapNotify, UnmapNotify events in our queue, which we
then process by calling XMapWindow, XUnmapWindow, and so it goes
forever, or at least some scheduler uncorks us by making us call
XMapWindow when the window is already mapped, or XUnmapWindow when the
window is already unmapped.
We can stop this madness by simply making sure never to call neither
XMapWindow or XUnmapWindow on OR windows, which is the correct thing to
do anyway.
We commonly used the generic, undetailed signal 'changed' to track
changes to preferences. Since we crash on unknown preference types,
this can be dangerous if somebody adds a new setting that has a
type we're unfamiliar with, and something else changes it.
Instead of crashing, just fizzle out doing nothing.
In gnome-shell, we have a feature where the user can unmaximize windows
by dragging them from the panel above the window. With accurate
anchoring, this looks really weird as the cursor is now "detached" from
the window. Detect this case and put the cursor in the middle of the
window titlebar instead.
This seems to be more accurate with what we currently see in
GNOME. Without having the app expose this information to us, it might be
a better idea to use the default frame style for this information instead.
The cursor was anchored wrongly when trying to unmaximize windows from
dragging them from the top of the screen because of a few think-o's and
some code that forgot to be updated when we moved to the frame rect
coordinate system.
The cursor is still offset for windows that start dragging from the top
panel. This is technically correct, but looks wrong. We'll fix this in
the next commit.
The initialization sequence before was quite icky, initializing Clutter
in a few different places depending on what was going on.
Put that all back into main.c
This removes our Xwayland dependency in the native path. The direct
grabs are still there for the X11 backend and are a bit disgusting,
but that's OK. We can refactor it out later.
This introduces some pretty lousy hackery because it depends on
https://github.com/xkbcommon/libxkbcommon/pull/10 , and I really
don't want to wait on that to squash this dep.
