We never want to send pressed keys to wayland clients on enter. The
protocol says that we should send them, presumably so that clients can
trigger their own key repeat routine in case they are given focus and
a key is physically pressed.
Unfortunately this causes some clients, in particular Xwayland, to
register key events that they really shouldn't handle, e.g. on an
Alt+Tab keybinding, where Alt is released before Tab, clients would
see Tab being pressed on enter followed by a key release event for
Tab, meaning that Tab would be processed by the client when it really
shouldn't.
Since the use case for the pressed keys array on enter seems weak to
us, we'll just fake that there are no pressed keys instead which
should be spec compliant even if it might not be true.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727178
Some applications, like totem, create keyboard/pointer objects from the
same client, and expect it to work. We made this work a while ago, but
due to an oversight in the code, we increment the serial on button press
for every resource that we need to send events to.
Since operations like move/resize use the grab serial of the devices to
determine whether the operation is exact, we need to make sure the same
serial goes to all devices.
Restructure the code so that all that's in the resource loop is the
sending of the event -- all the calculation that's needed happens
outside.
This fixes moving / resizing the Totem window not working sometimes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736840
We only broadcast input to the focus_resource_list, so we need to make
sure it's put in the proper list on startup.
This fixes input not working for windows when they first appear.
Argh. There's always more stuff to fix with keyboard/pointer. Every
single time I think I've fixed it, more stuff pops up.
It's possible for a released pointer to have repick / set_focus on it as
part of sync_input_focus. When the pointer is actually re-init'd, it
will memset 0, which can cause corruption as our destroy listener has
already been added.
Released devices should be idempotent, so just make sure method calls on
them don't have any effect.
Anytime the keymap is changed, either directly, or indirectly through the
keyboard capability being released/initialized, there should be a
notification of the modifiers being changed too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733563
Otherwise the focus_surface_listener list element becomes stale, and then
mangled if the devices' data is initialized again, and the memory memset().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733563
If we have a focused surface, we need to eat up key events, not
just if we have a non-empty focus resource list. The latter would
happen if we have a focused client but it never called get_keyboard.
Sophisticated clients, like those using ClutterGtk, will have more
than one focused resource per client, as both Clutter and GDK will
ask for a wl_pointer / wl_keyboard. Support this naturally using
the same "hack" as Weston: multiple resource lists, where we move
elements from one to the other.
In order to support multiple pointers for the same client, we're
going to need to kill it.
This will cause crashes for now, but will be fixed by the next
commit.
In particular we need to know about all key events to keep the xkb
state reliable even if the event is then consumed by a global shortcut
or grab and never reaches any wayland client.
We also need to keep track of all pressed keys at all times so that we
can send an updated set or pressed keys to the focused client when a
grab ends.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722847
Any given clutter event carries the modifier state as it was before it
occured but, for the wayland modifiers event, we want the state
including the current event.
To fix this, we'll keep our xkb_state instance around instead of the
serialized mods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722847
This is not needed since the instance is being destroyed and in fact
actively harmful when code called from other handlers disconnects us
for other reasons. In that case we might crash because the
disconnection doesn't prevent other handlers from running in the
current signal emission and thus we try to remove ourselves from an
empty list.
If the client destroys the pointer resource, we shouldn't unfocus the
surface, and we should regrab it when the client gets the pointer
resource again.
This also fixes a crash at surface destruction because of the unchecked
wl_link_remove that will happen on both pointer and surface destroy.
Both the pointer/keyboard resource and surface resource can be destroyed
at any point in the destruction process, so we need to have destroy
listeners on both. To make the code easier to follow, rename ->focus
to ->focus_surface at the same time, and rearrange the code so that
the two of them are always grouped together.
