Enabling edge scrolling before disabling two finger would result in
edge scrolling not actually being enabled because two finger is still
enabled at the time and we bail out.
This patch moves this logic to common code for both the native and X
backends and fixes it by ensuring that both settings are never set at
the same time and still re-checking if edge scrolling should be
enabled after two finger scrolling gets disabled.
We also simplify the code by not checking for supported/available
settings since the underlying devices will just reject those values
and there isn't anything we can do about it here. It's the UI's job to
only show supported/available settings to users.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771744
Checking for supported methods isn't needed since libinput will just
error out and do nothing itself if a requested method isn't supported
and, in fact, this logic was preventing the enum values 0 from being
set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771744
Commit fcc7501eb8 had the side-effect of
stacking fullscreen windows below docks which went unnoticed since we
don't use docks in GNOME anymore.
Instead of re-introducing the fullscreen layer, which we don't need
otherwise, we can fix this issue by ensuring we stack docks below all
other windows when the monitor they're on is marked fullscreen. This
has the added benefit that the visibility rule for 3rd party docks
becomes the same as gnome-shell's chrome.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772937
The keyboard focus semantics for non-grabbing xdg_shell v6 popups is
pretty undefined.
Same applies for subsurfaces, but in practice, subsurfaces never receive
keyboard focus, so it makes sense to do the same for non-grabbing
popups.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773210
mutter would remove focus from a toplevel when showing one of its
transient window which is not on top and not focused.
When using xdg_popup without grab as allowed in xdg_shell v6, the popup
wouldn't be focused, and if an intermediate event occurs before the
popup is shown, it's not placed on top either, which could randomly
trigger a loss of focus in the corresponding toplevel window.
Remove that special case, it doesn't make much sense to globally unset
focus when mapping a new window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773210
commit e2bfaf0751 does this:
g_hash_table_insert (cards,
g_udev_device_get_name (parent_device),
g_steal_pointer (&parent_device));
The problem is the g_steal_pointer call may happen before the
g_udev_device_get_name call leading to a crash.
This commit does the get_name call on an earlier line
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771442
Right now we accept any character device that matches the glob card*.
That's fine, but we can be a little more specific by checking that
the devtype is what we expect.
This commit does that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771442
Despite g_udev_client_new taking a list of subsystems, it doesn't
implicitly filter results to those subsystems.
This commit explicitly adds a subsystem match to make sure sound cards
don't end up in the resulting list of video cards.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771442
We shouldn't cancel the pointer grab when there is a compositor grab,
since that'd break things like drag-n-drop via the overview and
alt-tabs.
The original reason for cancelling the pointer grab on compositor grabs
was to avoid a re-entry when a compositor grab was activated while
there was an active pointer constraint grab. The re-entry would happen
when the compositor grab cleared the pointer focus. Clearing the focus
would trigger the pointer constraint to be deactivated, which would end
its grab. Ending the grab would reset the grab to the default one, which
could focus the same surface again, triggering the constraint to
re-enable before it finished disabling.
This is now avoided because the default grab handler is now aware of
compositor grabs, and won't override the cleared pointer focus until
the compositor grab ends.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772914
Teach the default grab about compositor grabs (i.e.
display->event_route) so that it can avoid setting a pointer focus when
after the compositor grab actively unset the pointer focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772914
The frame rect will at this point not be set for Wayland popups, since
the popup is placed and constrained before the actual buffer will be
attached. To still be able to calculate a proper monitor to be used for
constraining, use the ConstraintInfo::current dimensions instead, since
they will have the expected size. This should not cause any issues with
present paths since when a window is otherwise placed, it usually
doesn't change monitor calculation result.
This fixes opening a popup menu that would be positioned on the left
edge of a not-left-most monitor, for example a 'File' menu on a window
maximized on a second monitor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773141
Using the view's MetaMonitorInfo to find all the crtcs which should be
configured to display a given onscreen doesn't work unfortunately. The
association runs only the other way around, i.e. we need to go through
each crtc and find the ones corresponding to our monitor info.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773115
If this isn't initialized and an idle watch gets instanced before
meta_idle_monitor_native_reset_idletime() gets called, that idle watch
would get triggered as soon as we hit the main loop.
This was causing gnome-session to go into idle mode at session start
thus making gnome-shell lock the screen.
In the past this bug was being masked by either logind emiting
session active signals or a stray input event making it through at
startup.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772839
Commit 5fbb479301 was wrong too. What we
really want to do here is getting view relative coordinates given the
view's and the rectangle's global coordinates so we need to subtract
the view's origin from the rectangle's.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771502
When disabling the device/capability, we can't rely on cancelled events
being emitted timely, because the capability will be already disabled by
then, all touches must be cancelled immediately then.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772929
When the monitor is scaled (i.e. HiDPI scaling) the placement coordinates
ere still in unscaled xdg_surface window geometry coordinate space when
used to place the window. Fix this by scaling the coordinates by the
monitor scale of the parent toplevel window before using them.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771841
As meta_window_place_with_placement_rule will trigger a configure event
being sent ensure that the popup is placed on the correct monitor first
to ensure the right scale factor is applied.
Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771841
Directly set the monitor of the toplevel window for the popup to avoid
the change not being applied due to later constraints calculation.
Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771841
Always use the monitor of the toplevel surface's window, so that the
popup menu and the parent will always have the same scale. This fixes
the dimensions sent in the xdg_popup configure event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771841
When Xwayland confines, the surface dimensions will include the server
side window manager decorations. We don't want the decorations to be
included in the constraint region so intersect the calculated input
region with the parts of the buffer rect that is not part of the window
frame.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771859
Put the conditions for enabling a pointer constraint in a helper
function, and use that in both maybe_enable() and maybe_remove(). The
constraint region checking is still only done in maybe_enable()
however.
This changes the conditions for maybe disabling the constraint on focus
change and other trigger points, namely it makes constraints by Xwayland
not disable when they shouldn't due to the constraining window being an
override-redirect window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771859
When the grab is cancelled, for example because of an Alt-tab, VT
switch etc, disable or remove (depending on the constraint type) the
constraint. This avoids a re-entry issue when the focus is returned and
the focus listener tries to re-enable a disabled constraint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771859
Dismiss the popup when the grab is cancelled, so that if the grab is
ended for whatever reason (such as VT switching or the last pointer
being disconnected), it doesn't try to end the grab when it isn't
active.
This fixes a crash when VT switching back and forth while a popup grab
is active.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771858
Previously a grab could suddenly end without the grabber knowing
anything about it. Some grabs assume they won't suddenly end without
notice, and can use then new 'cancel' vfunc to be notified.
Currently a grab is cancelled when a new one is started (i.e. in
meta_wayland_pointer_grab_start()), when a non-popup compositor wide
event route is initiated, and when the seat looses the pointer
capability.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771858
Instead of using meta_wayland_pointer_end_grab() which focuses the new
grab, add a new helper mean to be used to reset the grab state without
changing the pointer focus. When using this function, the call site is
supposed to explicitly manage focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771646
Make the caller of focus setting check whether there is a pointer to
update the focus state of. It makes it more obvious what to expect, as
the call would be a no-op in when no pointer is present.
Grabbing is still allowed without the presence of a pointer because it
is used by popups even on touch-only systems.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771646
Make the caller of focus setting and grab starting check whether there
is a keyboard to update the focus state or start grabbing. It makes it
more obvious what to expect, as the call would be a no-op in when no
keyboard is present.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771646
The variable name 'l' usually refers to a GList iterator, but here it's
just a short hand for a specific list. Stop using this shorthand, since
it just makes it harder to read what list is used.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771646
