Similarly to Weston (where this code originated), there were two errors
in the X11 lockfile handling.
Firstly, after reading 11 characters from the lock file (which could
have been placed by any process), there was no guarantee of
NUL-termination, meaning strtol could've theoretically run off the end
of the string.
Secondly, whilst writing the new lock, the trailing NUL byte was not
correctly accounted for. The size passed as an input to snprintf takes
the maximum size of the string including the trailing NUL, whilst the
return (and the input to write) gives the actual size of the string
without the trailing NUL.
The code did attempt to check the return value, however snprintf returns
the size of the _potential_ string written, before snprintf culls it, so
this was off by one, and the LF was not being written.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774613
When the Xwayland wl_surface is created, it may not yet be possible to
associate it with the corresponding X11 Window. Add a signal to the
Xwayland role to communicate with any interested parties.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771050
Allow passing parameters (only GObject parameters supported for now) so
that role assignment can affect the paremeters set during construction.
If a role was already assigned when assigning, the passed parameters
are set using g_object_set_valist().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769936
We do some things when binding to a socket fails (closing the fd,
logging, unlinking files, ...) those might affect errno in some
or other way, so it might no longer be EADDRINUSE even if we later
try to make those non fatal.
It seems better to check errno soon after the failure, and don't
rely on it in any way at a later point. All error paths in
bind_to_abstract_socket() also have early logging, which also might
help figure out better the point of failure when the socket fails
to be created.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769578
We don't have any way of knowing what the intended size of a XWayland
cursor is supposed to be, so lets do what we do with regular XWayland
surfaces and don't scale them. The result is that cursor sprites of
HiDPI aware X11 clients will show correctly, but non-aware clients may
have tiny cursor sprites.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755099
If the wayland surface isn't available yet when we process the
WL_SURFACE_ID ClientMessage, we schedule a later function to try the
association again after we get a chance to process wayland requests.
This works fine except on cases where the MetaWindow already had a
previous surface attached (i.e. when the xwindow is reparented) since
we only break the existing association on the later function which
means that when processing the old surface's destruction we destroy
the MetaWindow and cancel the pending later function leaving us
without a MetaWindow and an invisible surface.
Fix this by detaching the old surface as soon as possible so that the
MetaWindow survives.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743339
Make a surface roles into objects with vfuncs for things where there
before was a big switch statement. The declaration and definition
boilerplate is hidden behind C macros.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
Being a "XWayland window" should be considered equivalent to a role,
even though it is not part of any protocol anywhere. The commit doesn't
have any functional difference, but just makes it clear that an
wl_surface managed by XWayland have the same type of special casing as
surface roles as defined by the Wayland protocol.
As the semantics are more explicit given the role is defined, a comment
explaining why the semantics need to be how they are was added.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
This piece of code hooks in both wl_data_device and the relevant X
selection events, an X11 Window is set up so it can act as the clipboard
owner when any wayland client owns the selection, reacting to
SelectionRequest events, and returning the data from the wayland client
FD to any X11 requestor through X properties.
In the opposite direction, SelectionNotify messages are received,
which results in the property contents being converted then written
into the wayland requestor's FD.
This code also takes care of the handling incremental transfers through
the INCR property type, reading/writing data chunk by chunk.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738312
The stop function currently manually constructs the lock
filename from the display number and also calls unlink
on the same, already known lock filename from the manager
struct.
This commit gets rid fo the manual construction in favor
of the saved lock filename.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748380
The start function has a few exit paths that need to
perform clean up of the lock file.
This commit consolidates those exit paths at the end
using an out label and gotos.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748380
since commit 8c16ac47c1, we started
creating the login screen on display 1024 instead of display 0.
This defeats this logic in try_display:
display++;
/* If display is above 50, then something's wrong. Just
* abort in this case. */
if (display > 50)
In practice it doesn't matter much since we only have one login
screen in most setups, but we should still fix the bug.
This commit introduces a separate counter to keep try of 50 tries,
rather than assuming "display number == number of tries".
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746545
The original code in Weston that this was ported from returned an errno,
not a boolean, so we were inadvertently returning TRUE here during an
error path. Fix that up.
In 3.16, GDM keeps a login screen running on vt1.
This login screen starts an Xwayland instance.
Since it's the first X server to start, it gets
the prized :0 display number.
This commit works around that problem, for now,
by having GDM's display number start at 1024.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746295
Windows can be freed at some point after they are unmanaged - because
there is an effect in progress, because a language binding is holding
a reference. Therefore, we need to clean up the later to associate
the xwayland and wayland windows deterministically in an "unamanaged"
handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736694
g_idle_add() makes no guarantee about when it will be run - if Mutter
is busy drawing and blocking glXSwapBuffers() it could happen only
minutes later. Use meta_later_add (META_LATER_BEFORE_REDRAW) instead -
this will deterministically be run after the Wayland socket is read
from but before the next frame is painted.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736694
If we attach to a MetaWindow that disappears before the idle fires,
we'll notice that we can't associate the window properly again and
try to access data on the MetaWindow struct, which might crash.
Install a weak ref that ties the lifetime of the idle to the lifetime
of the MetaWindow.
It seems every GTK+ app does this for some reason at startup. This
is really unfortunate, since we'll have to create and destroy a new
MetaWindow really quickly.
The latest Xorg / Xwayland has support for -displayfd being used
in conjunction with an explicit display number. Use that to know
when the X server is ready, rather than UNIX signals, because
they're UNIX signals.
Since we get the ClientMessage after the surface is created, there's
no good way to synchronize the two streams. In this case, what we
need to do is delay the surface commit until after we get the
ClientMessage. Ideally, we'd be using a better surface system overall
where committing the surface didn't depend on what type it is, but
oh well, this is a good short-term hack for now.
This is effectively the same, but since we lose the xserver.xml protocol
in the new XWayland DDX, we have to use SIGUSR1 anyway, so might as well
switch over now.
The make_toplevel / window_unmanaging interface has never made
a lot of sense to me. Replace it with set_window, which does
effectively the same thing.
It's still not perfect in the case of XWayland, but I don't think
XWayland will ever make me happy.
