When mutter recognizes a full-screen window, it tries to raise it to the top
of the stack. Unfortunately, a recent rewrite of the stack code didn't do
well with raising a window to the top of the stack if the stack wasn't in
a consistent state -- it would crash. Ensure that the stack is in a consistent
state at the top of meta_stack_raise/meta_stack_lower.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806437https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672797
Commit 2fc880db switched from focusing the topmost window as the default
window to focusing the MRU window. This was done in alignment with the
introduction of per-workspace MRU lists to avoid problems where the window
stack was inadvertently changed when focusing windows during window switches.
Now that focusing windows don't have as big an impact on the stacking order,
we can revert back to focusing the top window, which is less confusing to the
user.
For now, leave per-workspace MRU lists, as they're a pretty good approximation
of a global MRU list, and it works well enough.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620744
This is a new value, not associated with any keybindings, useful
when the WM needs to order the applications by last-interaction,
taking into account all windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667552
"warning: 'match_tile_mode' may be used uninitialized in this function", it
complains. It thinks it's not unused because of other values of
window->tile_mode, but other complex logic ensures that it can't be
META_TILE_MAXIMIZED, so this is a safe commit.
Windows that have minimum widths larger than the screen can't be maximized,
even though we put them in a maximized state and allow users to do so:
the window just won't change size and position. Fix this by simply not giving
the option to maximize, like what happens for non-resizable windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643606
A lot of code did something similar to:
MetaFrameBorders borders;
if (window->frame)
meta_frame_calc_borders (window->frame, &borders);
else
meta_frame_borders_clear (&borders);
Sometimes, the else part was omitted and we were unknowingly using
uninitalized values for OR windows. Clean this up by just testing
for a NULL frame in meta_frame_calc_borders and clearing for the
caller if so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643606
Since we're going to be evaluating the work area at startup now, we need
to make sure that we don't iterate over workspaces before they're assigned.
The easiest way to do this is to make sure that meta_window_get_workspaces
doesn't crash.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643606
Returns the matching tiled window. This is the topmost tiled window in a
complementary tile mode that is:
- on the same monitor;
- on the same workspace;
- spanning the remaining monitor width;
- there is no 3rd window stacked between both tiled windows that's
partially visible in the common edge.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643075
After the changes in style handling in GTK+, mutter's tooltips no
longer match the tooltip style used in applications. Given that
all buttons in the default layout are well-known, killing tooltips
altogether rather than fixing the styling issues looks like a valid
approach.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645101
Windows that start up in a size that is almost as big as the workarea create
extra work for the user (resizing or maximizing) so save the user's time by
detecting such windows and automaximize them.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671677
Basically we don't really want to create windows that are almost maximized in
size but not actually maximized. This creates work for the user and makes it
very difficult to use and resize manually.
So set the newly unmaximized window size to the previously used size or 80% of the
size of the current workarea (attempting to retain natural aspect ratio if
possible), whichever is smaller.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671677
Some modifiers like NumLock and ScrollLock don't make sense in
keybindings, which is why we ignore them when matching keybindings
to events. We should do the same in Javascript, so add an accessor
function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665215
The move-to-corner keybindings weren't treated as user actions, which
resulted in them not affecting the saved position - they weren't
always being treated as sticky. Marking them as a user action revealed
bugs in the positioning logic that were hidden by the constraint
code applied to automated moves. Fix those as well. Bug tracked
down by Mariusz Libera.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661256
