Commit Graph

63 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Neil Roberts
f8449582c8 Revert "cogl: Remove the generated array size for cogl_tex_coord_in"
This reverts commit 4cfe90bde2.

GLSL 1.00 on GLES doesn't support unsized arrays so the whole idea
can't work.

Conflicts:

	clutter/cogl/cogl/cogl-pipeline-glsl.c
2010-12-03 15:27:17 +00:00
Neil Roberts
6607306a2d cogl: Remove the generated array size for cogl_tex_coord_in
Under GLES2 we were defining the cogl_tex_coord_in varying as an array
with a size determined by the number of texture coordinate arrays
enabled whenever the program is used. This meant that we may have to
regenerate the shader with a different size if the shader is used with
more texture coord arrays later. However in OpenGL the equivalent
builtin varying gl_TexCoord is simply defined as:

varying vec4 gl_TexCoord[]; /* <-- no size */

GLSL is documented that if you declare an array with no size then you
can only access it with a constant index and the size of the array
will be determined by the highest index used. If you want to access it
with a non-constant expression you need to redeclare the array
yourself with a size.

We can replicate the same behaviour in our Cogl shaders by instead
declaring the cogl_tex_coord_in with no size. That way we don't have
to pass around the number of tex coord attributes enabled when we
flush a material. It also means that CoglShader can go back to
directly uploading the source string to GL when cogl_shader_source is
called so that we don't have to keep a copy of it around.

If the user wants to access cogl_tex_coord_in with a non-constant
index then they can simply redeclare the array themself. Hopefully
developers will expect to have to do this if they are accustomed to
the gl_TexCoord array.
2010-12-02 12:27:29 +00:00
Neil Roberts
bbf912b61d Lower the priority of the GLSL pipeline backend
Now that the GLSL backend can generate code it can effectively handle
any pipeline unless there is an ARBfp program. However with current
open source GL drivers the ARBfp compiler is more stable so it makes
sense to prefer ARBfp when possible. The GLSL backend is also lower
than the fixed function backend on the assumption that any driver that
supports GLSL will also support ARBfp so it's quicker to try the fixed
function backend next.
2010-11-24 18:06:44 +00:00
Neil Roberts
9089d95b3f Disable the fixed function backend for GLES2
GLES2 doesn't really support fixed function so if we disable it we can
remove the fixed function wrappers from the GLES2 Cogl backend.
2010-11-24 18:06:44 +00:00
Neil Roberts
60000690e1 cogl: Separate out state flags for the alpha test func and ref
Previously the flag to mark the differences for the alpha test
function and reference value were conflated into one. However this is
awkward when generating shader code to simulate the alpha testing for
GLES 2 because in that case changing the function would need a
different program but changing the reference value just requires
updating a uniform. This patch makes the function and reference have
their own state flags.
2010-11-24 18:06:44 +00:00
Neil Roberts
0b28018873 Move need_texture_combine_separate to cogl-pipeline
need_texture_combine_separate is moved to cogl-pipeline.c and renamed
to _cogl_pipeline_need_texture_combine_separate. The function is
needed by both the ARBfp and GLSL codegen backends so it makes sense to
share it.
2010-11-24 18:06:43 +00:00
Neil Roberts
fac7338fdd Move find_arbfp_authority to cogl-pipeline.c
The code for finding the arbfp authority for a pipeline should be the
same as finding the GLSL authority. So that the code can be shared the
function has been moved to cogl-pipeline.c and renamed to
_cogl_pipeline_find_codegen_authority.
2010-11-24 18:06:43 +00:00
Emmanuele Bassi
8e8f5d5748 pipeline: Use WrapModeInternal in the Layer struct
Since we're using CoglPipelineWrapModeInternal in the internal API
anyway, and the compiler complains loudly when comparing two enumeration
types without casting, the PipelineLayer struct should store the
wrap modes using the internal enumeration.
2010-11-23 13:08:25 +00:00
Robert Bragg
56f36cf9c2 primitives: validate with _cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer
Switch _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords to using
_cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer to iterate the layers of a pipeline when
validating instead of iterating the pipelines internal list, which is
risky since any modifications to pipelines (even to an override pipeline
derived from the original), could potentially corrupt the list as it is
being iterated.
2010-11-23 12:50:28 +00:00
Robert Bragg
1a3f946cc6 cogl: remove WrapModeOverrides from FlushOptions
This removes the possibility to specify wrap mode overrides within a
CoglPipelineFlushOptions struct since the right way to handle these
overrides is by copying the user's material and making the changes to
that copy before flushing. All primitives code has already switched away
from using these wrap mode overrides so this patch just removes unused
code and types. It also remove the wrap_mode_overrides argument for
_cogl_journal_log_quad.
2010-11-23 12:50:28 +00:00
Neil Roberts
22c61c5315 cogl-pipeline: Use layer overrides as CoglHandles instead of GLuint
Since d5634e37 the sliced texture backend now works in terms of
CoglTexture2Ds so there's no need to have special casing for
overriding the texture of a pipeline layer with a GL handle. Instead
we can just use cogl_pipeline_set_layer_texture with the
CoglHandle. The special _cogl_pipeline_set_layer_gl_texture_slice
function has now been removed and parts of the code for comparing
materials have been simplified.
2010-11-11 16:25:13 +00:00
Robert Bragg
353ea5299b cogl-shader: Prepend boilerplate for portable shaders
We now prepend a set of defines to any given GLSL shader so that we can
define builtin uniforms/attributes within the "cogl" namespace that we
can use to provide compatibility across a range of the earlier versions
of GLSL.

This updates test-cogl-shader-glsl.c and test-shader.c so they no longer
needs to special case GLES vs GL when splicing together its shaders as
well as the blur, colorize and desaturate effects.

To get a feel for the new, portable uniform/attribute names here are the
defines for OpenGL vertex shaders:

 #define cogl_position_in gl_Vertex
 #define cogl_color_in gl_Color
 #define cogl_tex_coord_in  gl_MultiTexCoord0
 #define cogl_tex_coord0_in gl_MultiTexCoord0
 #define cogl_tex_coord1_in gl_MultiTexCoord1
 #define cogl_tex_coord2_in gl_MultiTexCoord2
 #define cogl_tex_coord3_in gl_MultiTexCoord3
 #define cogl_tex_coord4_in gl_MultiTexCoord4
 #define cogl_tex_coord5_in gl_MultiTexCoord5
 #define cogl_tex_coord6_in gl_MultiTexCoord6
 #define cogl_tex_coord7_in gl_MultiTexCoord7
 #define cogl_normal_in gl_Normal

 #define cogl_position_out gl_Position
 #define cogl_point_size_out gl_PointSize
 #define cogl_color_out gl_FrontColor
 #define cogl_tex_coord_out gl_TexCoord

 #define cogl_modelview_matrix gl_ModelViewMatrix
 #define cogl_modelview_projection_matrix gl_ModelViewProjectionMatrix
 #define cogl_projection_matrix gl_ProjectionMatrix
 #define cogl_texture_matrix gl_TextureMatrix

And for fragment shaders we have:

 #define cogl_color_in gl_Color
 #define cogl_tex_coord_in gl_TexCoord

 #define cogl_color_out gl_FragColor
 #define cogl_depth_out gl_FragDepth

 #define cogl_front_facing gl_FrontFacing
2010-11-10 14:24:52 +00:00
Robert Bragg
f80cb197a9 cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline
This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a
while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline.

For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public
headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial
API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally.
Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to
integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work.

The basic reasons for the rename are:
- That the term "material" implies to many people that they are
  constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level
  texture abstraction.
    - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be
      re-inforcing this misconception.
- When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material
  sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which
  isn't the case in Cogl.
- In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting
  summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline
  configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment
  processing and blending.
- When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a
  document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it
  should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that
  description of the GPU pipeline.
- This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new
  pipeline object which is a container for program objects.

Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to
cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat
the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so
we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-11-03 18:09:23 +00:00