Make it a compile-time flag rather than a run-time flag, because
practically any time you're going to be debugging event spewing,
you're going to have to recompile anyway. Remove the WITH_VERBOSE_MODE
checks, too.
Which is used for Wayland popup grabs.
The issue here is that we don't want the code that raises or focuses
windows based on mouse ops to run while a client has a grab.
We still keep the "old" grab infrastructure in place for now, but
ideally we'd replace it eventually with a better grab-op infrastructure.
Clutter's input device initial position defaults to (-1, -1) on most
backends but for the evdev backend we changed it to be inside the
stage to prevent the pointer from wandering outside the stage until it
first enters, after which our constraining callback won't let it go
out.
This makes us be in sync with the real position from the start.
_SVID_SOURCE has been deprecated in newer versions of glibc breaking
-WError; the recommended replacement of _DEFAULT_SOURCE is fairly
new, so switch to _XOPEN_SOURCE instead.
_SVID_SOURCE has been deprecated in newer versions of glibc breaking
-WError; the recommended replacement of _DEFAULT_SOURCE is fairly
new, so switch to _XOPEN_SOURCE instead.
The "original coordinates" passed into meta_window_place() were the
coordinates of the client rectangle not the frame rectangle. When
meta_window_place() didn't place because the window was manually
positioned (e.g., 'xterm -geometry +x+y') that resulted in a window
being offset by the frame dimensions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724049
Since the introduction of frame sync in GTK+, updates to titlebar font and
colors haven't been working because GTK+ counts on the frame clock to
do style updates, and the frame clock doesn't run for an unmapped
GdkWindow. (It's possible that GtkStyleContext changes subsequent to
the introduction of the frame clock were also needed to fully break
things.)
We actually need to map the MetaFrames GdkWindow and let the
compositor code send out the frame sync messages in order to pick up
style changes.
Hopefully no bad side effects will occur from this - we make the window
override-redirect, 1x1, and outside the bounds of the screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725751
The "original coordinates" passed into meta_window_place() were the
coordinates of the client rectangle not the frame rectangle. When
meta_window_place() didn't place because the window was manually
positioned (e.g., 'xterm -geometry +x+y') that resulted in a window
being offset by the frame dimensions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724049
Since the introduction of frame sync in GTK+, updates to titlebar font and
colors haven't been working because GTK+ counts on the frame clock to
do style updates, and the frame clock doesn't run for an unmapped
GdkWindow. (It's possible that GtkStyleContext changes subsequent to
the introduction of the frame clock were also needed to fully break
things.)
We actually need to map the MetaFrames GdkWindow and let the
compositor code send out the frame sync messages in order to pick up
style changes.
Hopefully no bad side effects will occur from this - we make the window
override-redirect, 1x1, and outside the bounds of the screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725751
We need to resolve the keycode from the keysym again since the keycode
might have changed if there was a keymap switch between the grab and
the ungrab.
Before starting to use display_get_keybinding() we could compare
MetaKeyBinding.modifiers with MetaKeyCombo.modifiers directly. Now, we
need to resolve the virtual modifiers to match with the mask.
We need to resolve the keycode from the keysym again since the keycode
might have changed if there was a keymap switch between the grab and
the ungrab.
Before starting to use display_get_keybinding() we could compare
MetaKeyBinding.modifiers with MetaKeyCombo.modifiers directly. Now, we
need to resolve the virtual modifiers to match with the mask.
This allows us to look for a match with an O(1) search instead of O(n)
which is nice, particularly when running as a wayland compositor in
which case we have to do this search for every key press event (as
opposed to only when our passive grab triggers in the X compositor
case).
We actually need two hash tables. On one we keep all the keybindings
themselves which allows us to add external grabs without constantly
re-allocating the array we were using previously.
The other hash table is an index of the keybindings in the first table
by their keycodes and mask which is how we actually match the key
press events. This second table thus needs to be rebuilt when the
keymap changes since keycodes have to be resolved then but since we're
only keeping pointers to the first table it's a fast operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725588
Instead of looping over an array of keybindings to find the correct
binding, just use display_get_keybinding().
In the next commit, we'll change the array to be a hash map, so this
helps the patch be cleaner.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725588
This allows us to look for a match with an O(1) search instead of O(n)
which is nice, particularly when running as a wayland compositor in
which case we have to do this search for every key press event (as
opposed to only when our passive grab triggers in the X compositor
case).
We actually need two hash tables. On one we keep all the keybindings
themselves which allows us to add external grabs without constantly
re-allocating the array we were using previously.
The other hash table is an index of the keybindings in the first table
by their keycodes and mask which is how we actually match the key
press events. This second table thus needs to be rebuilt when the
keymap changes since keycodes have to be resolved then but since we're
only keeping pointers to the first table it's a fast operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725588
Instead of looping over an array of keybindings to find the correct
binding, just use display_get_keybinding().
In the next commit, we'll change the array to be a hash map, so this
helps the patch be cleaner.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725588
