These use now more of a "pull" model, where they receive update
notifications and the relevant input position is queried, instead
of the coordinates being passed along.
This allows to treat cursor renderers all the same independently
of the device they track. This notifying of position changes should
ideally be more backend-y than core-y, a better location will be
figured out in future commits.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1403>
Just because X11/XI uses a particular terminology doesn't mean we
have to use the same terms in our own API. The replacement terms
are in line with gtk@1c856a208, which seems a better precedent
for consistency.
Follow-up to commit 17417a82a5.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1425
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
This struct keeps the server side information for the wl_tablet_manager
global resource. It keeps the clients requesting this interface, and
does keep track of the plugged tablet devices, so
wl_tablet_manager.device_added is emitted on the expected clients.
