This reverts commit 33acb5fea0.
The issue here is that the pointer actor does not actually get reset
when the actor's reactivity changes, so we end up with stale picks after
actors are destroyed.
I have a local patch to Clutter for this, but I don't have time to
submit it upstream, so let's just use the ugly code for now.
This reverts commit e496ed50d6.
This was incorrect. wl_surface_destructor actually does the full repick
-- doing it here is dangerous, because the destroy listeners actually
run *before* the destructor, not after, so the surface is still alive.
It only contained a pointer to a wl_resource, which isn't much of
value. Just replace it with the wl_resource instead. Any future private
data should be handled by our future role system.
When grabbing with DND, we need to leave the pointer alone and
under the client's control. The code here was a bit messy before about
when it unset the window cursor -- it did it whenever there was no
current surface after repicking, which is a bit wrong, since it will
fire during a drag grab.
Move the check for this to update_cursor_surface, which is our standard
"sync" API for this, and then call update_cursor_surface after we set
the focus.
During a DND grab, pointer->focus_surface is NULL, since the wl_pointer
doesn't have any focused surface (it's in drag mode). In this case, the
drag interface has control of the focus, and when dragging into a NULL
surface, drag_grab_focus won't get called, properly detaching it from
the previous surface.
Let the interface->focus implementation do the fizzling out.
In the future, we should split out wl_pointer's implementation
(pointer->focus_surface) from the Wayland side of the generic pointer
wrapper (pointer->current) and use our event routing system to determine
or similar whether it should go to wl_pointer or wl_data_device.
Some applications, like totem, create keyboard/pointer objects from the
same client, and expect it to work. We made this work a while ago, but
due to an oversight in the code, we increment the serial on button press
for every resource that we need to send events to.
Since operations like move/resize use the grab serial of the devices to
determine whether the operation is exact, we need to make sure the same
serial goes to all devices.
Restructure the code so that all that's in the resource loop is the
sending of the event -- all the calculation that's needed happens
outside.
This fixes moving / resizing the Totem window not working sometimes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736840
We only broadcast input to the focus_resource_list, so we need to make
sure it's put in the proper list on startup.
This fixes input not working for windows when they first appear.
Argh. There's always more stuff to fix with keyboard/pointer. Every
single time I think I've fixed it, more stuff pops up.
It's possible for a released pointer to have repick / set_focus on it as
part of sync_input_focus. When the pointer is actually re-init'd, it
will memset 0, which can cause corruption as our destroy listener has
already been added.
Released devices should be idempotent, so just make sure method calls on
them don't have any effect.
We've long used a switch statement on the grab operation to determine
where events should go. The issue with MetaGrabOp is that it's a mixture
of a few different things, including event routing, state management,
and the behavior to choose during operations.
This leads to poorly defined event routing and hard-to-follow logic,
since it's sometimes unclear what should point where, and our utility
methods for determining grab operations apart can be poorly named.
To fix this, establish the concept of a "event route", which describes
where events should be routed to.
Otherwise the focus_surface_listener list element becomes stale, and then
mangled if the devices' data is initialized again, and the memory memset().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733563
It returns FALSE when button_count is not 0. But grabbing for
move/resize is activated by clicking the button, so this condition
disallows the wayland clients to be moved/resized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731237
There is no way this value will ever be read, because we set the
cursor_surface to NULL, this is set at the same time as cursor_surface,
and it's only read if cursor_surface is non-NULL.
Smooth scroll event vectors from clutter have the same dimensions as the
ones from from Xi2, i.e. where 1.0 is 1 discrete scroll step. To scale
these to the coordinate space used by wl_pointer.axis
vertical/horizontal scroll events, multiply the vector by 10.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729601
The default focus interface uses the button count to determine
whether we should update the pointer focused surface. When releasing
an implicit grab, we need to send the button release events to the
implicitly grabbed surface, so we can't reset the focus surface too
soon. We already explicitly set the focus at the end of implicit
grabs, so counting the buttons after is perfectly fine.
Scale surfaces based on output scale and the buffer scale set by them.
We pick the scale factor of the monitor there are mostly on.
We only handle native i.e non xwayland / legacy clients yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
Advertise the scale factor on the output and transform pointer and damage
events as well as input and opaque regions for clients
that scale up by themselves i.e use set_buffer_scale.
We do not scale any 'legacy' apps yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
Looking at the code paths where is_mouse / is_keyboard are used,
all of them should never be run when dealing with a COMPOSITOR
grab op, since they're filtered out above or the method is just
never run during that time.
It's confusing that COMPOSITOR is in here, and requires us to
be funny with other places in code, so just take it out.
pointer->current needs to always be the surface under the pointer,
even when we have a grab. We do need to make sure we keep the focus
surface the same even when we have a grab, though, so add logic
for that.
In order to correctly fix the issue to make sure we only set the
focused surface to NULL during a grab, but not the current surface,
we need to merge update_current_surface back into repick_for_event
so we have more control over the behavior here.
... not when we do an update.
We only repick when we handle events, not when we update. Perhaps
this is a mistake.
Since update runs before handle_event, this means that when we
drop a grab, update will notice the NULL surface, since we haven't
repicked after the event, and then we'll repick the correct surface.
The end result is that you see a root cursor after a grab ends,
rather than the correct window cursor.
This doesn't fix it, since the current surface becomes NULL when
we start the grab. But it does make the code here more correct when
we fix that bug.
Sophisticated clients, like those using ClutterGtk, will have more
than one focused resource per client, as both Clutter and GDK will
ask for a wl_pointer / wl_keyboard. Support this naturally using
the same "hack" as Weston: multiple resource lists, where we move
elements from one to the other.
In order to support multiple pointers for the same client, we're
going to need to kill it.
This will cause crashes for now, but will be fixed by the next
commit.
default_grab_focus tries to add implicit grab semantics where
focus won't take effect if there's a pointer button down. This
is not what we want for popup grabs at all, as it's perfectly
valid to want to drag on a menu while there's a button down.
meta_wayland_seat_repick() can be called in various cases while mutter
has a GRAB_OP ongoing which means we could be sending wrong pointer
enter/leave events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726123
Which is used for Wayland popup grabs.
The issue here is that we don't want the code that raises or focuses
windows based on mouse ops to run while a client has a grab.
We still keep the "old" grab infrastructure in place for now, but
ideally we'd replace it eventually with a better grab-op infrastructure.
This is not needed since the instance is being destroyed and in fact
actively harmful when code called from other handlers disconnects us
for other reasons. In that case we might crash because the
disconnection doesn't prevent other handlers from running in the
current signal emission and thus we try to remove ourselves from an
empty list.
If the client destroys the pointer resource, we shouldn't unfocus the
surface, and we should regrab it when the client gets the pointer
resource again.
This also fixes a crash at surface destruction because of the unchecked
wl_link_remove that will happen on both pointer and surface destroy.
Something noticed on code inspection. If we have a popup grab,
it will always return FALSE. The code here clearly meant to continue
if we had an existing popup grab from an existing client.
Both the pointer/keyboard resource and surface resource can be destroyed
at any point in the destruction process, so we need to have destroy
listeners on both. To make the code easier to follow, rename ->focus
to ->focus_surface at the same time, and rearrange the code so that
the two of them are always grouped together.
To prevent corruption, our focus listener needs to be removed even when
the surface is destroyed. So, bailing out when pointer->focus->resource
is NULL just isn't good enough.
When we have a new client, we potentially set the focus on one of its
surfaces when we map it but the client might not have called
wl_seat.get_keyboard/pointer yet. When it finally calls
get_keyboard/pointer we must then register its resource as the
focus_resource which means that we can only return early if
focus_resource is already set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719725
Grabs are now slice allocated structures that are handled by
whoever starts the grab. They contain a generic grab structure
with the interface and a backpointer to the MetaWaylandPointer.
The grab interface has been changed to pass full clutter events,
which allowed to remove the confusion between grab->focus and
pointer->focus. Invidual grabs are now required to keep their
focus, and choose whoever gets the events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707863
