As elsewhere, make sure objects that need to have a ownership up to the
context, and use this ownership chain to find relevant components, such
as the backend or the Wayland compositor object instance.
wayland/data-device: Hook up data devices to seats
They are tied to a seat - make that connection in struct fields too, so
that related objects can get to the context via it.
wayland: Don't get Wayland compositor via singleton getter
This means via the ownership chain or equivalent.
xwayland: Hook up manager to Wayland compositor
Same applies to the drag-n-drop struct.
xwayland: Make X11 event handling compositor instance aware
This avoids finding it via singletons in the callee.
xwayland: Don't get Wayland compositor from singleton
xwayland: Pass manager when handling dnd event
window/xwayland: Don't get Wayland compositor from singleton
xwayland/grab-keyboard: Don't get backend from singleton
xwayland: Don't get backend from singleton
wayland: Always get the backend from the context
This means traveling up the ownership chain or equivalent when
necessary.
wayland: Hook up data devices, offers and sources to the compositor
This allows tying them to a context without going through any
singletons.
wayland: Don't get display from singleton
xwayland: Don't get display from singleton
tablet: Don't get display from singleton
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2718>
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
Instead of having MetaWindowWayland having hooks into pointer
constraints subsystem, have the pointer constraints subsystem listen
for the signal itself and enable/disable itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
The wp_pointer_constraints protocol is a protocol which enables clients
to manipulate the behavior of the pointer cursor associated with a seat.
Currently available constraints are locking the pointer to a static
position, and confining the pointer to a given region.
Currently locking is fully implemented, and confining is implemented for
rectangular confinement regions.
What else is lacking is less troublesome semantics for enabling the lock
or confinement; currently the only requirement implemented is that the
window that appears focused is the one that may aquire the lock.
This means that a pointer could be 'stolen' by creating a new window that
receives active focus, or when using focus-follows-mouse, a pointer
passes a window that has requested a lock. This semantics can be changed
and the protocol itself allows any semantics as seems fit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
