This is inspired by 98892391d7 where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.
A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.
No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
The shortcut inhibitor protocol states that the “active” event should be
sent every time compositor shortcuts are inhibited on behalf of the
surface.
However, mutter would send that event only if the surface is focused,
which might not be the case if focus is on a shell surface.
Send the “active” event unconditionally to match the protocol
definition.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/10
Issuing a shortcut inhibit request for a surface without a window set
will lead to a crash when trying to show the shortcut inhibitor dialog.
In such a case, it's safer to deny the request.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792599
We would free the shortcut inhibit data only when the client destroys
its request, which is not the case when the clients itself is
destroyed, leading to a leak of the shortcut inhibit data.
Free the data on resource destruction instead, and simply destroy the
resource on destroy request.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787568
On Wayland, the grab()/ungrab() in gtk+/gdk are wired to the shortcut
inhibitor mechanism, which in turn shows the dialog, which can take
focus away from the client window when the dialog is shown.
If the client issues an ungrab() when the keyboard focus is lost, we
would hide the dialog, causing the keyboard focus to be returned to the
client surface, which in turn would issue a new grab(), so forth and so
on, causing a continuous show/hide of the shortcut inhibitor dialog.
To avoid this issue, keep the dialog around even if the shortcut inhibit
is canceled by the client, so that the user is forced to make a choice
that we can reuse on the next request without showing the dialog again.
Instead of hiding the dialog when the shortcut inhibitor is destroyed by
the client, we simply mark the request as canceled and do not apply the
user's choice.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787568
Plug the new MetaInhbitShortcutsDialog to the relevant Wayland protocol
implementation.
Also, remember the last user choice for a given surface to avoid asking
continuously the same question.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783342
