O-R windows appear in workspace->windows, which aren't relocatable,
so we can't simply check if the workspace is empty after relocating
all normal windows, since those windows remain.
Make sure that the only windows we have are those that are
on_all_workspaces.
This is bad behavior, and can also cause us to get in an infinite loop
if an OR window is mapped and unmapped in quick succession. This
sequence causes a MapNotify followed by an UnmapNotify, and when
processing the events, we'll call XMapWindow, XUnmapWindow, which will
put another set of MapNotify, UnmapNotify events in our queue, which we
then process by calling XMapWindow, XUnmapWindow, and so it goes
forever, or at least some scheduler uncorks us by making us call
XMapWindow when the window is already mapped, or XUnmapWindow when the
window is already unmapped.
We can stop this madness by simply making sure never to call neither
XMapWindow or XUnmapWindow on OR windows, which is the correct thing to
do anyway.
We commonly used the generic, undetailed signal 'changed' to track
changes to preferences. Since we crash on unknown preference types,
this can be dangerous if somebody adds a new setting that has a
type we're unfamiliar with, and something else changes it.
Instead of crashing, just fizzle out doing nothing.
In gnome-shell, we have a feature where the user can unmaximize windows
by dragging them from the panel above the window. With accurate
anchoring, this looks really weird as the cursor is now "detached" from
the window. Detect this case and put the cursor in the middle of the
window titlebar instead.
This seems to be more accurate with what we currently see in
GNOME. Without having the app expose this information to us, it might be
a better idea to use the default frame style for this information instead.
The cursor was anchored wrongly when trying to unmaximize windows from
dragging them from the top of the screen because of a few think-o's and
some code that forgot to be updated when we moved to the frame rect
coordinate system.
The cursor is still offset for windows that start dragging from the top
panel. This is technically correct, but looks wrong. We'll fix this in
the next commit.
The initialization sequence before was quite icky, initializing Clutter
in a few different places depending on what was going on.
Put that all back into main.c
This removes our Xwayland dependency in the native path. The direct
grabs are still there for the X11 backend and are a bit disgusting,
but that's OK. We can refactor it out later.
This introduces some pretty lousy hackery because it depends on
https://github.com/xkbcommon/libxkbcommon/pull/10 , and I really
don't want to wait on that to squash this dep.
Now that the internal mutter bindings and gnome-shell stopped using
META_KEY_BINDING_REVERSES, and after moving the 'adding shift reverses
the keybinding action' logic to gnome-control-center, we can remove
META_KEY_BINDING_REVERSES from mutter.
Plugin API is broken as this constant is removed from the exported
headers. ABI is broken as using this flag is now a noop.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732385
Currently the bindings for {switch,cycle}.* actions are created with the
META_KEY_BINDING_REVERSES flag so that <shift>+binding triggers the
reverse action. However, gnome-control-center does not know about this
kind of implicit bindings, and, for example, cannot warn when the user
tries to setup a conflicting <shift>+xxx binding.
These backward <shift> bindings are being explicitly set in
gsettings-desktop-schemas, so the META_KEY_BINDING_REVERSES annotation
can be removed for them from mutter.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732385
MetaKeyBinding can be marked as being reversed
(META_KEY_BINDING_IS_REVERSED), but MetaKeyHandlerFunc callbacks
cannot check whether this flag was set or not on the MetaKeyBinding
which triggered the callback.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732295
The existing workspace management code is quite hairy, with plenty of
logic inline in all of window.c, workspace.c, and screen.c, making it
hard to understand or make changes to, since you might forget to change
several of the other places the code was around.
Rewrite the internal workspace management logic so that it's
centralized and all in window.c. Document the invariants we need to
maintain, and ensure that these invariants are properly kept, with
asserts in various places.
Extensive testing on gnome-shell did not bring up any issues, and this
is a considerable cleanup.
This will be used to replace some of the hooks that are used to call
into window.c, so that the workspace index property is properly kept up
to date.
We can't name the property "index" since it causes conflicts with the
meta_workspace_index method. This should really be called
meta_workspace_get_index, but oh well.
I accidentally broke this in commit a119ea9. The code was considerably
more complicated than it needs to be, so let's replace it with a
g_list_find and nothing more.
Scanning over the hash table of XIDs is a terrible idea. Not only were
we excluding Wayland windows, but we were also looking at alarms and
barriers, too. We were lucky that that only contained GObjects where
our checks would work.
MetaGrabOp is painful and tedious to work with, because it's a
sequential series of values, meaning we have to use a giant unreadable
switch statement to figure out some basic things about the value.
To solve this, modify the encoding for MetaGrabOp and for the specific
window grab operations so that they're a set of bitflags that we can
easily check.
We've long used a switch statement on the grab operation to determine
where events should go. The issue with MetaGrabOp is that it's a mixture
of a few different things, including event routing, state management,
and the behavior to choose during operations.
This leads to poorly defined event routing and hard-to-follow logic,
since it's sometimes unclear what should point where, and our utility
methods for determining grab operations apart can be poorly named.
To fix this, establish the concept of a "event route", which describes
where events should be routed to.
It turns out that Clutter doesn't actually filter NumLock / ScrollLock /
CapsLock from button events due to its terrible event translation code.
Check only the grab mods to check if it's unmodified.
Popups could not set the cursor image, because the cursor tracker would
ignore window cursors if we had a popup active. The correct condition to
check for is already in should_block_wayland. Rename this to the more
sensible name windows_are_interactable, and use it in the cursor tracker.
Instead of returning a value based on whether or not we handled it, we
have this logic: either we have taken a grab on the window, in which
case we have a grab op and have handled it ourselves, or we did not take
a grab and *need* to replay the event to the window.
Handle this in events.c by checking the grab operation in the same way
that we check the other grab ops.
This is an accidental regression from 7a109a1. If we mark the event as
handled, then we *need* to set grab_op, or do some other sort of
behavior, since we have a grab.
Now that we always use XKB, it's very unlikely that we'll get a
MappingNotifier without a subsequence XkbKeymapNotify event. Just
do all the work always.
This will also help us considerably for the future when we'll be
putting the keymap event in the backend.
This allows creating the stage much earlier than it otherwise would have
been. Our initialization sequence has always been a bit haphazard, with
first the MetaBackend created, then the MetaDisplay, and inside of that,
the MetaScreen and MetaCompositor.
Refactor this out so that the MetaBackend creates the Clutter
stage. Besides the clarity of early initialization, we now have much
easier access to the stage, allowing us to use it for things such as
key focus and beyond.
Mutter depends on the X11 windowing backend of Clutter, unless it's used
as a Wayland display server.
This allows Mutter to run without breaking in case Clutter changes the
order with which windowing backends are selected, like it was the case
for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734587
The order of selection of the Clutter backends has not been made public,
so it cannot be relied upon since the introduction of the multiple
backends support; since Mutter requires the X11 backend functionality,
it should select the X11 windowing system, in the same way it selects
the EGL backend when compiled and run as a Wayland display server.
At this point there shouldn't be any system capable of running mutter
that doesn't have it and we're introducing functionality like setting
the keymap that has an hard requirement on it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734301
This way the xserver never paints the frame background, even if
the client window is destroyed. This allows us to have clean
destroy window animation.
There is no problem with interactive resizing because applications
are using the XSync protocol, so we're not painting unless the
client has redrawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734054
MetaGestureTracker has been separating the "did I handle an event?" and the
"should the event be filtered out?" questions, merge this and make
handle_event() reply to "should the event be only handled by me?".
If a sequence wasn't accepted yet by the gesture tracker, the event will
go through (eg. not handled exclusively by the gesture tracker) and it'll
still be processed by Clutter, triggering gesture actions, and maybe
changing the sequence into other state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
On X11 this works because only emulated pointer events are listened for. On
wayland, the single touch behavior must be enforced in touch events, ignoring
every other sequence.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
This function tells the obvious on X11, and implements a similar mechanism
on wayland to determine the "pointer emulating" sequence, or one to stick
with when implementing single-touch behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
Due to the way the MetaGestureTracker processes every touch event, this
will tell as closely to Clutter as possible the current number of touches
happening on the stage.
Even though, this is subject to windowing behavior, on X11, rejected touches
will be soon followed by a XI_TouchEnd event, so the compositor will stop
seeing touch sequences that are still operating on clients. On wayland, touch
sequences are processed by the compositor during all their lifetime, so these
will stay on the MetaGestureTracker with META_SEQUENCE_PENDING_END state, yet
still tracked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
On wayland, touches are initially both handled by the compositor and sent
to clients, proceeding to cancellation on clients only after the compositor
claims the sequence for itself. Implement the cancellation detail through
MetaGestureTracker::state-changed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
