Scale surfaces based on output scale and the buffer scale set by them.
We pick the scale factor of the monitor there are mostly on.
We only handle native i.e non xwayland / legacy clients yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
Advertise the scale factor on the output and transform pointer and damage
events as well as input and opaque regions for clients
that scale up by themselves i.e use set_buffer_scale.
We do not scale any 'legacy' apps yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
I was talking with other people and they became confused at the
term "double-buffered", since we were also talking about
double-buffering in general, e.g. swapping between two buffers.
Instead, we'll adapt the "pending state" nomenclature that we
already use for the field / variable names.
Really, it is a special case. When the subsurface is synchronous,
commit changes meaning from being applied immediately to being
queued up for replay later. Handle this explicit special case
with an explicit special case in the code.
This means that in all other paths, we can unconditionally
apply the actor immediately.
Even when it doesn't have a role.
This fixes cursors not quite working right, as they're a "detached"
surface without a role since nobody called set_cursor on them yet.
Instead of using commit_attached_buffer / actor_surface_commit.
We want to kill the return values of these methods because we
really should always be calling them, even if the surface doesn't
have a role.
This is also something that we did upstream. Since we want to
introduce an explicit "xdg_transient" window type for tooltips
and popovers, and since "transient_for" is a confusing dumb
80s term lifted from the ICCCM spec, just rename it.
This was changed upstream a little while ago for C++ compatibility.
It's also the more common term for the operation: you close a window,
you don't delete one. In fact, a delete event might seem like it
would be about resource management instead.
Since we get the ClientMessage after the surface is created, there's
no good way to synchronize the two streams. In this case, what we
need to do is delay the surface commit until after we get the
ClientMessage. Ideally, we'd be using a better surface system overall
where committing the surface didn't depend on what type it is, but
oh well, this is a good short-term hack for now.
The make_toplevel / window_unmanaging interface has never made
a lot of sense to me. Replace it with set_window, which does
effectively the same thing.
It's still not perfect in the case of XWayland, but I don't think
XWayland will ever make me happy.
Previously, a sequence like this would crash a client:
=> surface.attach(buffer)
=> buffer.destroy()
The correct behavior is to wait until we release the buffer before
destroying it.
=> surface.attach(buffer)
=> surface.attach(buffer2)
<= buffer.release()
=> buffer.destroy()
The protocol upstream says that "the surface contents are undefined"
in a case like this. Personally, I think that this is broken behavior
and no client should ever do it, so I explicitly killed any client
that tried to do this.
But unfortunately, as we're all well aware, XWayland does this.
Rather than wait for XWayland to be fixed, let's just allow this.
Technically, since we always copy SHM buffers into GL textures, we
could release the buffer as soon as the Cogl texture is made.
Since we do this copy, the semantics we apply are that the texture is
"frozen" in time until another newer buffer is attached. For simple
clients that simply abort on exit and don't wait for the buffer event
anyhow, this has the added bonus that we'll get nice destroy animations.
Do to a bad mixup, the surface listener was never actually fired.
This was accidentally fixed as part of a refactoring in a27fb19,
but the surface listener was broken, and we started crashing. To
fix, just remove the surface listener, as we've mostly been testing
without it.
This is not needed since the instance is being destroyed and in fact
actively harmful when code called from other handlers disconnects us
for other reasons. In that case we might crash because the
disconnection doesn't prevent other handlers from running in the
current signal emission and thus we try to remove ourselves from an
empty list.
