We first set the workspace to the transient-for parent's, and then
try to set on the current workspace. If both happen, we double the
work on adding/removing it from the workspace, and everything that
happens in result.
Should reduce some activity while typing on the Epiphany address
bar, as the animation results in a number of xdg_popup being created
and destroyed to handle the animation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/556
As per commit 040de396b, we don't try to grab when shortcuts are inhibited,
However, this uses the focus window assuming that it is always set, while this
might not be the case in some scenarios (like when unsetting the focus before
requesting take-focus-window to acquire the input).
So allow the button grab even if the focus window is not set for the display
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/663https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/668
On Wayland, if a client issues a inhibit-shortcut request, the Wayland
compositor will disable its own shortcuts.
We should also disable the default handler for the button grab modifier
so that button events with the window grab modifiers pressed are not
caught by the compositor but are forwarded to the client surface.
That also fixes the same issue with Xwayland applications issuing grabs,
as those end up being emulated like shortcut inhibition.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/642
When we're unfullscreening, we might be returning to a window state that
has its size either managed by constraints (tiled, maximized), or not
(floating). Lets just pass the configure size 0x0 when we're not using
constrained sizes (i.e. the window going from being fullscreen to not
maximized) and let the application decide how to size itself.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/638https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/621
In all places (including src/wayland) we tap into meta_x11_display* focus
API, which then calls meta_display* API. This relation is backwards, so
rework input focus management so it's the other way around.
We now have high-level meta_display_(un)set_input_focus functions, which
perform the backend-independent maintenance, and calls into the X11
functions where relevant. These functions are what callers should use.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/420
We use a GtkIconTheme (thus icon-theme, thus xsettings, thus x11) just to
grab a "missing icon" icon to show in place. Relax this requirement that
surfaces for icon/mini-icon will be set, and just let it have NULL here.
It seems better to have the callers (presumably UI layers) aware of this
and set a proper icon by themselves, but AFAICS there is none in sight,
not even plain mutter seems to use MetaWindow::[mini-]icon. Probably
worth a future cleanup.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/420
We'd break the loop for moving attached windows at the first window,
meaning we'd only ever move a single attached dialogs or popup if it was
the first window in the list. This doesn't work out well when there are
multiple popups open, so don't break out of the loop at all until all
windows are potentially moved.
This fixes an issue in gtk4 where one or more non-grabbing popups would
end up unattached if there were more than one and the parent window was
moved.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/592
This function was added for historic reasons, before that we had GSlist's
free_full function.
Since this can be now easily implemented with a function call and an explicit
GDestroyFunc, while no known dependency uses it let's move to use
g_slist_free_func instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/57
When an application stops responding, the shell darkens its windows.
If a window from a not-responding application gets unmanaged
then the shell will currently throw an exception trying to retrieve
the now-dissociated window actor.
That leads to a "stuck window" ghost on screen and a traceback
in the log.
This commit addresses the problem by making sure the effect is cleaned
up before the actor is disocciated from its window.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/575
If a client maps a persistent popup with a placement rule, then resizes
the parent window so that the popup ends up outside of the parent,
unmanage the popup and log a warning about the client being buggy.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/496
When a parent window is moved, attached windows (attached modal dialogs
or popups) is moved with it. This is problematic when such a window
hasn't been shown yet (e.g. a popup that has been configured but not
shown), as it'll mean we try to constrain an empty window. Avoid this
issue by not trying to auto-move empty windows.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/496
As per commit 43633d6b, we mark an unmanaging window as not focusable, while
this is true, it might cause not resetting the current focused window when
unmanaging it causing a crash.
Also this wouldn't allow to check if a window can be focused when unmanaging it,
so let's revert the previous behavior.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/462
For various error and warning messages, mutter includes a description of
the window, and that description includes a snippet of the title of the
window. Those snippets find their way into system logs, which then means
they can potentially find their way into bug reports and similar. Remove
the window title information to eliminate this potential privacy issue.
Commit 25f416c13d added additional compilation warnings, including
-Werror=return-type. There are several places where this results
in build failures if `g_assert_not_reached()` is disabled at compile
time and the compiler misses a return value.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/447
It's a UI pattern that has been superseded by client-side decorations,
apps that used to set the hint have generally moved on to headerbars.
Given that and the limitation to server-side decorated X11 windows,
GTK4 removed the client-side API for setting the hint, it's time to
follow suite and retire the feature.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/221
Commit 8d3e05305 ("window: Force update monitor on hot plugs") added the
flag `META_WINDOW_UPDATE_MONITOR_FLAGS_FORCE` passed to
`update_monitor()` from `update_for_monitors_changed()`.
However, `update_for_monitors_changed()` may choose to call another code
path to `move_between_rects()` and `meta_window_move_resize_internal()`
eventually.
As `meta_window_move_resize_internal()` does not use the "force" flag,
we may still end up in case where the window->monitor is left unchanged.
To avoid that problem, add a new `MetaMoveResizeFlags` that
`update_for_monitors_changed()` can use to force the monitor update from
`meta_window_move_resize_internal()`.
Fixes: 8d3e05305 ("window: Force update monitor on hot plugs")
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/189
It relied on indices in arrays determining tile direction and
non-obvious bitmask logic to translate to _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS. Change
this to explicitly named edge constraints, and clear translation methods
that converts between mutters and GTK+s edge constraint formats.
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
In order to allow a window with a custom rule placement to be moved
together with its parent, the final rule used derived from the
constraining were used for subsequent constraints. This was not enough
as some constraining cannot be translated into a rule, such as sliding
across some axis.
Instead, make it a bit simpler and just remember the position relative
to the parent window, and use that the next time.
This is a rework of 5376c31a33 which
caused the unwanted side effects.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/332
With Wayland, a window is not showing until it's shown. Until this
patch, the initial state of MetaWindow, on the other hand, was that a
window is initialized as showing. This means that for a window to
actually be classified as shown (MetaWindow::hidden set to FALSE),
something would first have to hide it.
Normally, this wasn't an issue, as normally we'd first create a window,
determine it shouldn't be visible (due to missing buffer), hide it
before the next paint, then eventually show it. This doesn't work if
mutter isn't drawing any frames at the moment (e.g. the user switched
VT), as we'd miss the hiding before showing as e result of a buffer
being attached. The most visible side effect is that a window can't be
moved as the window actor remains frozen.
This commit fixes this issue by correctly classifying a newly created
Wayland window as "hidden".
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/331
Changes in window decoration result in the window being reparented
in and out its frame. This in turn causes unmap/map events, and
XI_FocusOut if the window happened to be focused.
In order to preserve the focused window across the decoration change,
add a flag so that the focus may be restored on MapNotify.
Closes: #273
On Wayland, xdg-foreign would leave a modal dialog managed even after
the imported surface is destroyed.
This is sub-optimal and this breaks the atomic relationship one would
expect between the parent and its modal dialog.
Make sure we unmanage the dialog if transient_for is unset even for
Wayland native windows.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/174
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/221
A window placed using a placement rule should keep that relative
position even if the parent window moves, as the position tied to the
parent window, not to the stage. Thus, if the parent window moves, the
child window should move with it.
In the implementation in this commit, the constraints engine is not
used when repositioning the children; the window is simply positioned
according to the effective placement rule that was derived from the
initial constraining, as the a xdg_popup at the moment cannot move
(relative its parent) after being mapped.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/274
Commit a3da4b8d5b changed updating of
window monitors to always use take affect when it was done from a
non-user operation. This could cause feed back loops when a non-user
driven operation would trigger the changing of a monitor, which itself
would trigger changing of the monitor again due to a window scale
change.
The reason for the change, was that when the window monitor changed due
to a hot plug, if it didn't actually change, eventually the window
monitor pointer would be pointing to freed memory.
Instead of force updating the monitor on all non-user operations, just
do it on hot plugs. This allows for the feedback loop preventing logic
to still do what its supposed to do, without risking dangling pointers
on hot plugs.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/189
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/192
The bool determines whether the call was directly from a user operation
or not. To add more state into the call without having to add more
boolenas, change the boolean to a flag (so far with 'none' and 'user-op'
as possible values). No functional changes were made.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/192
Since commit b3b9d9e16 we no longer have to pass the unmanaging window
to make sure we don't try to focus it again, however the parameter also
influences the focus policy by giving ancestors preference over the normal
stack order.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/15
We refuse to move focus while a grab operation is in place. While this
generally makes sense, there's no reason why the window that owns the
grab shouldn't be given the regular input focus as well - we pretty
much assume that the grab window is also the focus window anyway.
In fact there's a strong reason for allowing the focus change here:
If the grab window isn't the focus window, it probably has a modal
transient that is focused instead, and a likely reason for the focus
request is that the transient is being unmanaged and we must move
the focus elsewhere.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/15
Previously we relied on the test-client to make sure that a window was
shown. For X11, we did not need to do anything, but for Wayland we had
to make sure we had drawn the first frame, otherwise mutter wouldn't
have a buffer making the window not showable.
Doing it this way doesn't work anymore however, since the 'after-paint'
event will be emitted even if we didn't actually paint anything. This is
the case with current Gtk under Wayland, where we won't draw until the
compositor has configured the surface. In effect, this mean we'll get a
dummy after-paint emission before the first frame is actually painted.
Instead, move the verification that a "show" command has completed by
having the test-runner wait for a "shown" signal on the window, which is
emitted in the end of meta_window_show(). This requires an additional
call to gdk_display_sync() in the test-client after creating the window,
to make sure that the window creation vents has been received in the
compositor.
