Glib stopped providing any fallback implementations on systems without
memmove() all the way back in 2013. Since then, the symbol is a simple
macro around memmove(); use that function directly now that glib added
a deprecation warning.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/689
This debug statement is actually applied all the times, while it could be useful
for crashes analysis, these days the same can be done using `MALLOC_CHECK_` and
`MALLOC_PERTURB_` env variables.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/581
Instead of using gtk_css_provider_get_default(), add a
static GtkCssProvider and fetch it instead. Creating
GtkCssProviders consume a bit more memory, so keeping
a single one alive is slightly more memory saving.
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
Gtk now is caching the themed cairo surfaces, then as per
commit gtk@e36b629c the surface device scale is used to figure
out the current paint scaling.
Without this when using background-image's for window buttons
the -gtk-scaled icons isn't properly resized.
Fixes#99
When painting the titlebar, button icons that aren't available in the
desired size need to be scaled. However the current code inverses the
scale factor, with the result that the adjusted icons are much worse
than the original icons, whoops.
This went unnoticed for a long time given that most icons are availa-
ble in the desired 16x16 size, and the most likely exceptions - window
icons - are not shown by default.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/23
GTK+ paints some elements like box shadows (which Adwaita likes to (ab)use
for borders) outside the rectangle passed to gtk_render_*. This is not
an issue if our own invisible frame border is big enough, but in case
of non-resizable windows we end up clipping away part of the decoration.
Use the newly added gtk_render_background_get_clip() to make sure we
always use a mask that is large enough to contain all decorations.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752794
GTK+ improved its CSS support, and the default theme started to make
use of it, so we must update our theming code accordingly. Add support
for margins where they make sense.
GTK+ improved its CSS support, and the default theme started to make
use of it, so we must update our theming code accordingly. Start by
supporting min-width/min-height where it makes sense.
The default theme started to use them in GTK+ commit 371f50, so
we need to update the style contexts to keep matching the style
of client-side decorations.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757101
We have been ignoring those buttons since 3.16 after they had been
broken in the default theme for a couple of versions. As nobody
appears to miss them, it's time to remove them for good.
We use a single style context to draw titlebar buttons, updating
its state according to each button's prelight state as necessary.
This assumes that the original state is neither ACTIVE nor PRELIGHT,
which means we need to reset the state after drawing to avoid
propagating the state of the last-drawn button.
As we opt out of GTK+/Clutter's HiDPI handling, we need to apply the
window scaling factor manually to decorations, both the geometry and
when drawing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744354
There is no good reason to do so, besides a nice way to check whether
a particular button is enabled. However there are legitimate reasons
for overdrawing like box-shadows or outlines, so remove the clip.
With support for the old metacity theme format gone, there's no
reason to keep storing theme information in terms of the old theme
properties. Just store the padding/border information for each
element directly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
MetaFrameStyle now only holds a MetaFrameLayout, so we can cut out
the middle man and use the layout directly. And as we are already
using a single style/layout per frame set and handle frame state
and focus by setting appropriate style flags, MetaFrameStyleSet
is pointless too - just store one MetaFrameLayout per frame type
directly in the theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Rest in peace you magnificent format, love-child of arcane X11 drawing
API and markup craze, you will not be missed.
We do remember however the bravery of a many men and women, who fearlessly
descended into the guts of your intrinsics and turned ugliness into beauty;
their work will still be spoken of when you will long have been forgotten.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
All geometry/drawing information is now picked up from the GTK+ theme,
so replace the remaining bits (hide_buttons + title_scale) with
hardcoded values from the default Adwaita theme and stop loading
the metacity theme altogether.
If there is a need to theme those constants again in the future,
we should make them available from GTK+ where they are available
for client-side decorations as well. They certainly don't justify
maintaining support for a complex theme format.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Few themes ever had support for those in the first place, and even
less supported them properly; in particular support in the default
theme has been broken for a while now.
With this in mind (and considering that not even the tweak tool exposes
any UI to configure them), let's (try to) remove support altogether - the
corresponding rects are still kept around, so it's easy to add back in
case we reconsider (and get the necessary artwork).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
GTK+ doesn't deal with different frame types for its client-side
decorations - it just treats dialogs the same as normal windows
and ignores the odder frame types like UTILITY and MENU. That's
fine as those have largely gone out of fashion anyway, but it's a
different case for the WM - we still have to support them somehow.
For now, just apply the existing title_scale factor to the geometry
information picked up from the theme in addition to the title font.
If it turns out that there's demand for something more sophisticated,
we can still consider adding wm-only style information to the GTK+
theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
We now have everything in place to pick up geometry and drawing
information from GTK+ rather than the metacity theme, so do just
that; the metacity theme is now only used for some constants
(title_scale, hide_buttons, ...), which we will replace soon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
We want to eventually pick up all theme information from GTK+ instead
of our own theme format; to prepare for this, add another helper method
to fill in geometry information from the GTK+ theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
GTK+ expresses the window state as style classes and widget state for
client-side decorations. Add a helper method to translate our own frame
state to the corresponding changes to the style context hierarchy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Sounds obvious, doesn't it?
After this change when titlebar-uses-system-font is set, the "system
font" used will not be a generic one, but match what GTK+ uses in
client-side decorations.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
In order to pick up all theme information from GTK+, a single style
context is not enough; a style hierarchy that closely matches the widget
hierarchy by GTK+'s client-side decorations will allow this soon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Our current use of style contexts is fairly limited - we don't
use them for much more than picking up some color information.
We will soon start to make more elaborate use of GTK style
information, but a single context will no longer be enough
to draw a frame then.
To prepare for this, add a simple ref-counted type to wrap
style information.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
