Use connect_after() to accomodate code in GNOME Shell that,
when benchmarking drawing performance, connects to ::after-paint
and calls glFinish(). The timing information from that will be
more accurate if we hold off until that completes before we signal
apps to begin drawing the next frame. If there are no other
connections to ::after-paint, connect() vs. connect_after() doesn't
matter.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732350
The output_id is more of an opaque identifier for the monitor, based on
its underlying ID from the windowing system. Since we also use the term
"output_id" for the output's index, rename our use of the opaque cookie
"output_id" to "winsys_id".
This signal is emitted the first time a frame of contents of the
window is completed by the application and has been drawn on the
screen. This is meant to be used for performance measurement of
application startup.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732343
With get_input_region existing, get_input_rect is a misnomer. Really,
it's about the geometry of the output surface, and it's only used that
way in the compositor code.
Way back when in GNOME 3.2, get_input_rect was added when we added
invisible borders. get_outer_rect was always synonymous with server-side
geometry of the toplevel. get_outer_rect was used for both user-side
policy (the "frame rect") and to get the geometry of the window.
Invisible borders were meant to extend the input region of the frame
window silently. Since most users of get_outer_rect cared about the
frame rect, we kept that the same and added a new method, get_input_rect
to get the full rect of the framed window with all invisible borders for
input kept on.
As time went on and CSD and Wayland became a reality, the relationship
between the server-side geometry and the "frame rect" became more
complicated, as can be evidenced by the recent commits. Since clients
don't tend to be framed anymore, they set their own input region.
get_buffer_rect is also sort of a poor name, since X11 doesn't really
have buffers, but we don't really have many other alternatives.
This doesn't change any of the code, nor the meaning. It will always
refer to the rectangle where the toplevel should be placed.
The smallest possible spread corresponds to an unblurred shadow, which
neither grows nor shrinks - thus the spread should be zero not negative
as returned by our current calculation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731353
Avoid populating *_VERSION constants through cflags in pkg-config-file
which could be overridden by the project using it. Properly prefix the
defines with META_ to make gi-scanner happy.
When opening the window menu without an associated control - e.g.
by right-clicking the titlebar or by keyboard - using coordinates
for the menu position is appropriate. However when the menu is
associated with a window button, the expected behavior in the
shell can be implemented much easier with the full button geometry:
the menu will point to the center of the button's bottom edge
rather than align to the left/right side of the titlebar as it
does now, and the clickable area where a release event does not
dismiss the menu will match the actual clickable area in mutter.
So add an additional show_window_menu_for_rect() function and
use it when opening the menu from a button.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731058
The last commit added support for the "appmenu" button in decorations,
but didn't actually implement it. Add a new MetaWindowMenuType parameter
to the show_window_menu () functions and use it to ask the compositor
to display the app menu when the new button is activated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730752
It looks weird to have Alt+Space pop up under the cursor instead
of the top-left corner of the window, and the Wayland request will
pass through the coordinates as well.
Add it to the compositor interface, and extend the
_GTK_SHOW_WINDOW_MENU ClientMessage to support it as well.
Scale surfaces based on output scale and the buffer scale set by them.
We pick the scale factor of the monitor there are mostly on.
We only handle native i.e non xwayland / legacy clients yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
Talking it over with Owen, we weren't sure why this was here.
At one point, we were creating a foreign stage window, so potentially
Clutter didn't select for its own events, but now we're using a standard
stage window, so this seems weird.
Why we did it on the COW, nobody knows. Maybe copy/paste bugginess?
Each level in the tower is initialized by binding the texture for that
level to an offscreen framebuffer and rendering the previous level as a
textured rectangle. The problem was that we were blending the previous
level with undefined data so argb32 windows with transparencies would
result in artefacts. This makes sure to disable blending when drawing
the textured rectangle.
