Whether a surface needs to keep the committed wl_buffer un-released
depends on what role the surface gets assigned to. For example a cursor
role may need an unreleased shm buffer in order to create a hw cursor from
it.
In order to support this, keep a separate reference and use count to
the buffer on behalf of the in the future assigned role, and release
those references after the surface was assigned a role. A role that
needs its own references and use counts, must in its assign function
make sure to add those.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762828
Each wl_surface.commit with a newly attached buffer should result in
one wl_buffer.release for the attached buffer. For example attaching
the same buffer to two different surfaces must always result in two
wl_buffer.release events being emitted by the server. The client is
responsible for counting the wl_buffer.release events and be sure to
have received as many release events as it has attached and committed
the buffer, before reusing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762828
The when surface->input_region is NULL, it should be interpreted as the
whole surface region. If not, the effective input region is the
intersection of the buffer region and the input region set by
wl_surface.set_input_region. Add
meta_wayland_surface_calculate_input_region() that does this
calculation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762661
Don't unset the surface->buffer if the associated wl_buffer object is
destroyed. The MetaWaylandBuffer doesn't really only represent a
wl_buffer object, but also the data (texture) created from the given
wl_buffer. Thus, for example destroying a released SHM wl_buffer should
not destroy the MetaWaylandBuffer instance, because the texture may
still be used.
This commit also fixes a race where calc_showing would hide a window
because, at the time of calculation whether it should be showing, the
surface's buffer had been destroyed as described above.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762716
Since a buffer can be used by multiple surfaces at once,
we need to release the buffer only after all surfaces
are finished with it. Currently we track whether or
not to release the buffer based on the accessible boolean.
This commit changes it to a counter to accomodate multiple
users.
Also, each surface needs to know whether not it is done with
the buffer, so this commit adds a buffer_used boolean to the
surface state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761613
The wp_pointer_constraints protocol is a protocol which enables clients
to manipulate the behavior of the pointer cursor associated with a seat.
Currently available constraints are locking the pointer to a static
position, and confining the pointer to a given region.
Currently locking is fully implemented, and confining is implemented for
rectangular confinement regions.
What else is lacking is less troublesome semantics for enabling the lock
or confinement; currently the only requirement implemented is that the
window that appears focused is the one that may aquire the lock.
This means that a pointer could be 'stolen' by creating a new window that
receives active focus, or when using focus-follows-mouse, a pointer
passes a window that has requested a lock. This semantics can be changed
and the protocol itself allows any semantics as seems fit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
Make a surface roles into objects with vfuncs for things where there
before was a big switch statement. The declaration and definition
boilerplate is hidden behind C macros.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
If a surface doesn't have a role, the compositor will not know how, if
or when it will be painted. By adding it to the compositor frame
callback list, the compositor will respond to the client that the
surface has been drawn already which might not be true.
Instead, queue the frame callback in a list that is then processed when
the surface gets a role assigned. The compositor may then, given the
role the surface got, queue the frame callback accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
Being a "XWayland window" should be considered equivalent to a role,
even though it is not part of any protocol anywhere. The commit doesn't
have any functional difference, but just makes it clear that an
wl_surface managed by XWayland have the same type of special casing as
surface roles as defined by the Wayland protocol.
As the semantics are more explicit given the role is defined, a comment
explaining why the semantics need to be how they are was added.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
Use a better name, use GNOME conventions for error handling, open code the
client error reporting and send the error to the correct resource.
wl_subcompositor doesn't have a role error yet, so continue use some
other error. The only effect of this is error received in the client will
be a bit confusing, it will still be disconnected.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754215
When a client sets an input region or a opaque region to NULL, it
should still be considered a change to the corresponding region on the
actor. This patch makes sure this state is properly forwarded.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753222
Keep the active position state in its original coordinate space, and
synchronize the surface actor with it when it changes and when
synchronizing the rest of the surface state, in case the surface scale
had changed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745655
Whenever a MetaSurfaceActor is painted, update the list of what outputs
the surface is being drawed upon. Since we do this on paint, we
effectively avoids this whenever the surface is not drawn, for example
being minimized, on a non-active workspace, or simply outside of the
damage region of a frame.
DND icons and cursors are not affected by this patch, since they are not
drawn as MetaSurfaceActors. If a MetaSurfaceActor or a parent is cloned,
then we'll check the position of the original actor again when the clone is
drawn, which is slightly expensive, but harmless. If the MetaShapedTexture
instead is cloned, as GNOME Shell does in many cases, then these clones
will not cause duplicate position checks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744453
This will be useful in order to interact with drag dest surfaces in
its windowing-specific ways, although everything defaults to the
wayland vfuncs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738312
Add set_modal ond unset_modal to the gtk_surface interface. When a
surface is modal, the compositor can treat it differently from non-modal
dialogs, for example attach it to the parent window if any. There is
currently no changes to input device focus; it is up to the client to
ignore events to the parent surface that is wanted.
This bumps the gtk_shell version to 2.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745720
Since the surface actor knows more about how it draws itself, instead of
pushing texture state (buffer and scale), input region and opaque region
from MetaWaylandSurface after having transformed into what the surface
actor expects, make the surface actor set its own state given what state
the Wayland surface is in.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744933
It only contained a pointer to a wl_resource, which isn't much of
value. Just replace it with the wl_resource instead. Any future private
data should be handled by our future role system.
We assume in meta_window_wayland_move_resize that the next commit that
changes the geometry will always be for our next pending operation, so
if we have a move pending on a resize, the next commit will trigger the
move. This is, of course, fundamentally wrong.
We broke this assumption even more now that we don't fizzle out calls to
meta_window_move_resize_internal and now call it on every commit, which
means that a simple damage and then commit would complete a pending
move.
This was even broken by apps like weston-terminal, which, when clicking
on the maximize button, first redraws the terminal with the maximize
button state back on hover on press, and would only redraw when it got
the configure event with the coordinates.
To track the correct commit to apply the move for, we implement the
ack_configure request and ignore all move/resizes that happen before
that.
Right now, we actually fizzle out the entire move/resize if there's a
future pending configure we're waiting on.
Advertise the scale factor on the output and transform pointer and damage
events as well as input and opaque regions for clients
that scale up by themselves i.e use set_buffer_scale.
We do not scale any 'legacy' apps yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
I was talking with other people and they became confused at the
term "double-buffered", since we were also talking about
double-buffering in general, e.g. swapping between two buffers.
Instead, we'll adapt the "pending state" nomenclature that we
already use for the field / variable names.
The make_toplevel / window_unmanaging interface has never made
a lot of sense to me. Replace it with set_window, which does
effectively the same thing.
It's still not perfect in the case of XWayland, but I don't think
XWayland will ever make me happy.
Do to a bad mixup, the surface listener was never actually fired.
This was accidentally fixed as part of a refactoring in a27fb19,
but the surface listener was broken, and we started crashing. To
fix, just remove the surface listener, as we've mostly been testing
without it.
