The original code in Weston that this was ported from returned an errno,
not a boolean, so we were inadvertently returning TRUE here during an
error path. Fix that up.
The enums are swapped currently, because for edge scroll is enabled two finger
scroll and similary for two finger scroll is enabled edge scroll, what is
apparently wrong.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746870
When a client wants to start initialized it my set the maximized state
before having attached any buffers. Before we'd not notify the client of
the new expected size if the previous size was 0x0 as it would normally
mean we'd resize to 1x1, but since this is not always the case, only
avoid notifying the client if the previous size was 0x0 and the result
is 1x1.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745303
As we opt out of GTK+/Clutter's HiDPI handling, we need to apply the
window scaling factor manually to decorations, both the geometry and
when drawing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744354
If the wl_surface resource happens to be destroyed before any other
role resource, the destructor for the latter will attempt to
access/modify random memory.
Fix this by ensuring the associated resources are destroyed on the
wl_surface destructor, this will free all associated memory and
remove the resources ahead of their imminent destruction.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745734
In 3.16, GDM keeps a login screen running on vt1.
This login screen starts an Xwayland instance.
Since it's the first X server to start, it gets
the prized :0 display number.
This commit works around that problem, for now,
by having GDM's display number start at 1024.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746295
With all input events being handled through clutter, this only confuses
things, and most nominally, coerces touch events through places we didn't
intend to, like the window frame.
This makes again all touch events only handled in the passive grab on X11,
while the rest stays pointer (emulated) only.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745335
On startup, the cursor is kept hidden if there's any touchscreen available.
If the device that was last interacted is removed, we check on available
pointing devices though, so we don't possibly hide the pointer if there are
further mice/touchpads/etc.
Devices being added don't update cursor visibility, we wait for the user
interacting with those instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712775
On X11, calling this function on meta_display_handle_events() will not catch
mouse events happening over clients, so poke directly in the backend for
XI_DeviceChanged events, which mutter will get on device switches.
The code has been slightly refactored so we deal with XIEvents at a single
handle_input_event() function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712775
This function can be used to trigger changes depending on the device type
that is currently emitting the events. So far, it is used to switch cursor
visibility on/off on touchscreen interaction.
A "last-device-updated" signal has also been added, in order allow hooking
other behavior changes (eg. OSK) when the last device changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712775
Since commit 6e06648f7, we start out with the invisible frame parts
only, and then add the unconstrained rect's height (which consists of
the visible parts of both frame and client window) *unless* the window
is shaded. While we indeed don't want to add the client height in that
case, we need to explicitly include the visible frame parts now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746145
There is no good reason to do so, besides a nice way to check whether
a particular button is enabled. However there are legitimate reasons
for overdrawing like box-shadows or outlines, so remove the clip.
The initial pointer position is set by clutter. At the moment it
is the point 16x16 on the screen. But this point is not always
in the visible area on monitors (the monotors can be arranged in
many different ways).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745752
Otherwise the pointer might be "lost" outside the visible area. Note
that the constraining code only ensures the pointer doesn't leave the
visible area but if the pointer is already outside because the rug was
pulled under it then it doesn't do anything.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745121
