Some applications, like totem, create keyboard/pointer objects from the
same client, and expect it to work. We made this work a while ago, but
due to an oversight in the code, we increment the serial on button press
for every resource that we need to send events to.
Since operations like move/resize use the grab serial of the devices to
determine whether the operation is exact, we need to make sure the same
serial goes to all devices.
Restructure the code so that all that's in the resource loop is the
sending of the event -- all the calculation that's needed happens
outside.
This fixes moving / resizing the Totem window not working sometimes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736840
We only broadcast input to the focus_resource_list, so we need to make
sure it's put in the proper list on startup.
This fixes input not working for windows when they first appear.
Argh. There's always more stuff to fix with keyboard/pointer. Every
single time I think I've fixed it, more stuff pops up.
It's possible for a released pointer to have repick / set_focus on it as
part of sync_input_focus. When the pointer is actually re-init'd, it
will memset 0, which can cause corruption as our destroy listener has
already been added.
Released devices should be idempotent, so just make sure method calls on
them don't have any effect.
We've long used a switch statement on the grab operation to determine
where events should go. The issue with MetaGrabOp is that it's a mixture
of a few different things, including event routing, state management,
and the behavior to choose during operations.
This leads to poorly defined event routing and hard-to-follow logic,
since it's sometimes unclear what should point where, and our utility
methods for determining grab operations apart can be poorly named.
To fix this, establish the concept of a "event route", which describes
where events should be routed to.
Otherwise the focus_surface_listener list element becomes stale, and then
mangled if the devices' data is initialized again, and the memory memset().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733563
It returns FALSE when button_count is not 0. But grabbing for
move/resize is activated by clicking the button, so this condition
disallows the wayland clients to be moved/resized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731237
There is no way this value will ever be read, because we set the
cursor_surface to NULL, this is set at the same time as cursor_surface,
and it's only read if cursor_surface is non-NULL.
Smooth scroll event vectors from clutter have the same dimensions as the
ones from from Xi2, i.e. where 1.0 is 1 discrete scroll step. To scale
these to the coordinate space used by wl_pointer.axis
vertical/horizontal scroll events, multiply the vector by 10.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729601
The default focus interface uses the button count to determine
whether we should update the pointer focused surface. When releasing
an implicit grab, we need to send the button release events to the
implicitly grabbed surface, so we can't reset the focus surface too
soon. We already explicitly set the focus at the end of implicit
grabs, so counting the buttons after is perfectly fine.
Scale surfaces based on output scale and the buffer scale set by them.
We pick the scale factor of the monitor there are mostly on.
We only handle native i.e non xwayland / legacy clients yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
Advertise the scale factor on the output and transform pointer and damage
events as well as input and opaque regions for clients
that scale up by themselves i.e use set_buffer_scale.
We do not scale any 'legacy' apps yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
Looking at the code paths where is_mouse / is_keyboard are used,
all of them should never be run when dealing with a COMPOSITOR
grab op, since they're filtered out above or the method is just
never run during that time.
It's confusing that COMPOSITOR is in here, and requires us to
be funny with other places in code, so just take it out.
pointer->current needs to always be the surface under the pointer,
even when we have a grab. We do need to make sure we keep the focus
surface the same even when we have a grab, though, so add logic
for that.
In order to correctly fix the issue to make sure we only set the
focused surface to NULL during a grab, but not the current surface,
we need to merge update_current_surface back into repick_for_event
so we have more control over the behavior here.
... not when we do an update.
We only repick when we handle events, not when we update. Perhaps
this is a mistake.
Since update runs before handle_event, this means that when we
drop a grab, update will notice the NULL surface, since we haven't
repicked after the event, and then we'll repick the correct surface.
The end result is that you see a root cursor after a grab ends,
rather than the correct window cursor.
This doesn't fix it, since the current surface becomes NULL when
we start the grab. But it does make the code here more correct when
we fix that bug.
Sophisticated clients, like those using ClutterGtk, will have more
than one focused resource per client, as both Clutter and GDK will
ask for a wl_pointer / wl_keyboard. Support this naturally using
the same "hack" as Weston: multiple resource lists, where we move
elements from one to the other.
In order to support multiple pointers for the same client, we're
going to need to kill it.
This will cause crashes for now, but will be fixed by the next
commit.
