When resolving what keycodes a key binding resolves to, only look up
key codes from the current layout group. Without this, unwanted
overlaps may occur. For example when a keymap has both a dvorak and a
qwerty layout on different layout groups, one keybinding may be bound
on multiple keys, arbitrarily "shadowing" another.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786408
Add API to get the layout group (layout index) currently active. In the
native backend this is done by fetching the state directly from the
evdev backend; on X11 this works by listening for XkbStateNotify
events, caching the layout group value.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786408
Don't wait for clutter to initialize for connecting to X11; do it when
constructing the backend instance. This way we can later depend on
having an X11 connection earlier during initialization.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786408
When opening a laptop lid, one will likely want to restore the
configuration one had prior to closing it, so when ensuring monitor
configuration, first try to see if the previously set configuration is
both complete (all connected monitors are configured) and applicable
(it is a valid configuration) and only try to generate a new from
scratch if that failed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
In order to go back in monitor configurations, save them to a history.
The history is implemented as a max 3 element long queue, where newly
set configurations are pushed to the head, and old are popped from the
tail.
The difference between using a single previous config reference and a
queue is that we can now remember the configuration used prior to a
D-Bus triggered configuration when the user discarded the configuration.
This will later be used to restore a previous configuration when a
laptop lid is opened.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
So far some basic testing, including:
* Test that the migrated configuration is applicable
* Test that a monitors.xml with multiple configurations are translated
* Test rotation
* Test tiled monitor discovery (well, test a made up tiled monitor
configuration since I don't have a real one)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
This commit changes the new configuration system to use monitors.xml
instead of monitors-experimental.xml. When starting up and the
monitors.xml file is loaded, if a legacy monitors.xml file is
discovered (it has the version number 1), an attempt is made to migrate
the stored configuration onto the new system.
This is done in two steps:
1) Parsing and translation of the old configuration. This works by
parsing file using the mostly the old parser, but then translating the
resulting configuration structs into the new configuration system. As
the legacy configuration system doesn't carry over some state (such as
tiling and scale used), some things are not available. For tiling, the
migration paths makes an attempt to discover tiled monitors by
comparing EDID data, and guessing what the main tile is. Determination
of the scale of a migrated configuration is postponed until the
configuration is actually applied. This works by flagging the
configuration as 'migrated'.
2) Finishing the migration when applying. When a configuration with the
'migrated' flag is retrieved from the configuration store, the final
step of the migration is taken place. This involves calculating the
preferred scale given the mode configured, while making sure this
doesn't result in any overlapping logical monitor regions etc.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
The zero-initialized winsys id was incorrectly used as the key to find
the old output to base active/primary state from, which would never
succeed unless the winsys id happened to be 0. Fix this by using the
winsys id that will be used, i.e. the connector id.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
The 'normal' transform has the value 0, so the g_warn_if_fail()
expression failed. Correct it so that it doesn't complain when no
transform is checked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
The problem is that libinput offers the possibility to not enabled
dragging when tap-to-click is enabled but mutter doesn't. For people who
have a sensitive touchpad and who like tap-to-click option, dragging is
launched even when you don't want it : for example, when you select a
folder, most of the time the folder is dragging whereas just selected or
when you want to select some lines of a text file, several lines are
moved as a cut-paste which is not expected and erase datas.
To fix it, you need to have the possibility to desactivate the drag
option when you use tap-to-click in mutter. Because it's already a
specification of libinput, it remains to add it to mutter.
Implementation with X11 is added too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775755
The meta_wayland_surface_hide_inhibit_shortcuts_dialog() function
disconnected the "destroy" handler, but we'd still be listening on
response events. Change this to just hide the dialog, leaving the data
intact with the proper life time signal in place.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786385
The 'data' object is attached to the MetaWaylandSurface as a GObject
qdata. It is created once, and stays allocated until the surface is
destroyed. To make things clearer, connect to the "destroy" signal just
after creating, and from a on_surface_destroyed() callback call the
.._free() function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786385
When suspending (i.e. VT switching away, the GDM gnome-shell instance
gets hidden, or changing user), destroy the onscreen and offscreen
monitor framebuffers. When resuming, the stage views and framebuffers
will be recreated anyway.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786299
Message was poking stage_x11, which doesn't exist in this context.
Just print the Window that is receiving the event, the event will be
emitted into the only existing stage anyway.
Plug the new MetaInhbitShortcutsDialog to the relevant Wayland protocol
implementation.
Also, remember the last user choice for a given surface to avoid asking
continuously the same question.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783342
