Commit Graph

21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Müllner
7ff52b6128 wayland/gtk: Only perform allowed titlebar gestures
The window functions "work" regardless of whether the client allows
the behavior or not. That is, it's up to the caller to not call
maximize and friends when the action isn't allowed.

Add appropriate checks, which should make the titlebar_gesture()
behavior identical to titlebar actions for server-side decorations.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2139

Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2281>
2022-02-10 20:00:15 +01:00
Florian Müllner
111055acdd wayland/gtk-shell: Add titlebar_gesture request
This allows client to delegate titlebar gestures to the compositor,
which allows for better consistency with server-side decorations,
and a wider range of actions (including lower-on-middle-click).

The protocol addition is based on a suggestion from Carlos Garnacho
and Jonas Ådahl.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/602

Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1944>
2021-08-04 14:41:43 +00:00
Sebastian Keller
c9aa43aa7a wayland/gtk-shell: Add an explicit gtk-shell surface release request
Previously the wl_resource and MetaWaylandGtkSurface corresponding to
any client gtk_surface have been kept around until the exit of the
client due to the client side destroy method not signaling the
destruction to the server. Ideally the protocol would have specified a
destroy request marked as destructor to handle this automatically,
however this is no longer possible due to the destroy method being
implicitly generated in the absence of an explicit request in the
protocol. Adding a destroy request marked as destructor now would
generate a new destroy method that unconditionally would send the
request to the server, which would break clients running on servers not
supporting that request.

So instead of modifying the destroy request add a new "release"
destructor, that indicates to the server that it can release the
resource. This can be optionally be used by clients depending on the
server protocol version.

Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1307>
2021-01-29 16:21:16 +00:00
Sebastian Keller
b41c4aec26 wayland/gtk-shell: Fix MetaWaylandGtkSurface leak on surface destroy
The MetaWaylandSurface corresponding to a MetaWaylandGtkSurface can be
destroyed before the MetaWaylandGtkSurface is destroyed. In its destroy
function MetaWaylandSurface however was unsetting the destructor of the
correspnding resource along with the gtk_surface1 interface
implementation. This was done to prevent further gtk_surface1 requests
on a NULLed MetaWaylandSurface, if it has been destroyed before the
MetaWaylandGtkSurface.

It would be enough to just unset the resource implementation, while
keeping the destructor to fix this leak. However the following commit
will rely on the implementation being available after the
MetaWaylandSurface has been destroyed. So instead introduce NULL checks
for all functions that can be called on the gtk_surface1 interface and
do not unset the implementation.

Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1307>
2021-01-29 16:21:16 +00:00
Jonas Ådahl
c0c74484bc wayland: Don't access MetaWaylandSurface::window directly
It'll be moved to the role owning it, accessed via a helper function
implemented by the role. Currently it still just fetches the field in
MetaWaylandSurface.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/835
2020-02-19 22:34:28 +00:00
Robert Mader
92375c75f8 cleanup: Use g_clear_signal_handler() where possible
This is inspired by 98892391d7 where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.

A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.

No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
2019-11-21 15:02:27 +00:00
Carlos Garnacho
181c7cab32 wayland: Use right sign for workspace ID
We get a signed integer (-1 meaning "no workspace specified"), store it in
an unsigned integer, check for >= 0 (of course it is!) and set as the window
workspace (signed integer, -1 meaning "show on all workspaces"). What could
possibly go wrong?

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/639
2019-06-24 09:21:49 +00:00
Carlos Garnacho
bbfaf8204b wayland: Honor startup sequence workspace on .request_focus
We handle this in backend specific code for x11, so do the wayland
bits here. We can only honor this on applications that request focus
on a surface after a startup request, as we do need an explicit
surface to apply the workspace on (and we don't have additional clues
like WMCLASS on X11). Notably, gtk_shell1.notify_startup doesn't suffice.

Another gotcha is that the .request_focus happens when the surface is
already "mapped". Due to the way x11 and the GDK api currently work (first
reply on the startup id, then map a window, then request focus on that
window). This means the surface will ignore at this point
window->initial_workspace, so it must be actively changed.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/544
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/674
2019-05-29 16:21:15 +00:00
Carlos Garnacho
177b4df217 wayland: Implement window activation and focus stealing prevention
This is done through gtk-shell ATM. If a window requests focus with
an invalid startup ID, just the demands-attention flag will be set.
The "did user interaction happen in between" checks are left to
meta_window_activate_full/meta_window_focus, by passing the timestamp
of the original launch request.
2019-01-26 18:07:03 +01:00
Jonas Ådahl
0d29609aec wayland/gtk-shell: Emit new capabilities event when changed
The capabilities may change during the compositors lifetime, so make
gtk-shell emit the capabilities event when capabilities change.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/276
2018-11-27 15:34:13 +01:00
Jonas Ådahl
00619f3a1c wayland: Add MetaWaylandGtkShell object
To be used to store state.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/276
2018-11-27 15:34:13 +01:00
Carlos Garnacho
92349a4668 wayland: Complete the startup sequence as given from gtk-shell 2018-11-23 12:27:13 +00:00
Carlos Garnacho
26fbd56a95 x11: Refactor the X11 startup notification bits into src/x11
Only one little bit left in MetaDisplay, because SnStartupSequence
is exposed in API there. These bits will be removed in future
commits.
2018-11-23 12:27:13 +00:00
Jonas Ådahl
180bb02fa5 wayland/gtk-shell: Use helper to fill state array 2018-11-08 13:21:53 +01:00
Jonas Ådahl
d59cf98690 wayland/gtk-shell: Fix signedness of resource version variable
wl_resource_get_version() returns an int, not an unsigned int.
2018-11-08 13:21:49 +01:00
Jonas Ådahl
640a04d0e4 window: Make edge constraint code more readable
It relied on indices in arrays determining tile direction and
non-obvious bitmask logic to translate to _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS. Change
this to explicitly named edge constraints, and clear translation methods
that converts between mutters and GTK+s edge constraint formats.
2018-11-08 13:21:21 +01:00
Jonas Ådahl
ca5b27baf5 wayland/gtk-shell: Handle requests after toplevel was unmanaged
As with xdg-toplevel, a gtk-surface can be unmanaged by the compositor
without the client knowing about it, meaning the client may still send
updates and make requests. Handle this gracefully by ignoring them. The
client needs to reset all the state anyway, if it wants to remap the
same surface.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/240
2018-08-27 11:43:53 +00:00
Georges Basile Stavracas Neto
aea66ddff6 wayland: Send edge constraints
Following up the previous patch, this patch makes the
Wayland backend send the edge constraints through a
custom protocol extension internal to GTK.

As it mature, we can think of upstreaming the protocol
to Wayland itself.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751857
2017-10-03 19:38:32 -03:00
Jonas Ådahl
a8d86b4876 wayland: Make gtk_shell handle our private window states
Instead of using the "allocated" state ranges of xdg_shell, lets just
use our own gtk_shell by adding a state enum and a configure event.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769936
2016-08-25 12:19:40 +08:00
Jonas Ådahl
3a75e55cd8 wayland: Move gtk_surface fields out of MetaWaylandSurface
Let the gtk_shell extension unit handle its own state.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769936
2016-08-25 12:19:40 +08:00
Jonas Ådahl
c73d3d9d83 wayland: Move out gtk_shell from meta-wayland-surface.c
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769936
2016-08-25 12:19:40 +08:00