Previously the wl_resource and MetaWaylandGtkSurface corresponding to
any client gtk_surface have been kept around until the exit of the
client due to the client side destroy method not signaling the
destruction to the server. Ideally the protocol would have specified a
destroy request marked as destructor to handle this automatically,
however this is no longer possible due to the destroy method being
implicitly generated in the absence of an explicit request in the
protocol. Adding a destroy request marked as destructor now would
generate a new destroy method that unconditionally would send the
request to the server, which would break clients running on servers not
supporting that request.
So instead of modifying the destroy request add a new "release"
destructor, that indicates to the server that it can release the
resource. This can be optionally be used by clients depending on the
server protocol version.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1307>
The MetaWaylandSurface corresponding to a MetaWaylandGtkSurface can be
destroyed before the MetaWaylandGtkSurface is destroyed. In its destroy
function MetaWaylandSurface however was unsetting the destructor of the
correspnding resource along with the gtk_surface1 interface
implementation. This was done to prevent further gtk_surface1 requests
on a NULLed MetaWaylandSurface, if it has been destroyed before the
MetaWaylandGtkSurface.
It would be enough to just unset the resource implementation, while
keeping the destructor to fix this leak. However the following commit
will rely on the implementation being available after the
MetaWaylandSurface has been destroyed. So instead introduce NULL checks
for all functions that can be called on the gtk_surface1 interface and
do not unset the implementation.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1307>
This is inspired by 98892391d7 where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.
A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.
No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
We get a signed integer (-1 meaning "no workspace specified"), store it in
an unsigned integer, check for >= 0 (of course it is!) and set as the window
workspace (signed integer, -1 meaning "show on all workspaces"). What could
possibly go wrong?
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/639
We handle this in backend specific code for x11, so do the wayland
bits here. We can only honor this on applications that request focus
on a surface after a startup request, as we do need an explicit
surface to apply the workspace on (and we don't have additional clues
like WMCLASS on X11). Notably, gtk_shell1.notify_startup doesn't suffice.
Another gotcha is that the .request_focus happens when the surface is
already "mapped". Due to the way x11 and the GDK api currently work (first
reply on the startup id, then map a window, then request focus on that
window). This means the surface will ignore at this point
window->initial_workspace, so it must be actively changed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/544
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/674
This is done through gtk-shell ATM. If a window requests focus with
an invalid startup ID, just the demands-attention flag will be set.
The "did user interaction happen in between" checks are left to
meta_window_activate_full/meta_window_focus, by passing the timestamp
of the original launch request.
It relied on indices in arrays determining tile direction and
non-obvious bitmask logic to translate to _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS. Change
this to explicitly named edge constraints, and clear translation methods
that converts between mutters and GTK+s edge constraint formats.
As with xdg-toplevel, a gtk-surface can be unmanaged by the compositor
without the client knowing about it, meaning the client may still send
updates and make requests. Handle this gracefully by ignoring them. The
client needs to reset all the state anyway, if it wants to remap the
same surface.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/240
Following up the previous patch, this patch makes the
Wayland backend send the edge constraints through a
custom protocol extension internal to GTK.
As it mature, we can think of upstreaming the protocol
to Wayland itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751857