To prevent corruption, our focus listener needs to be removed even when
the surface is destroyed. So, bailing out when pointer->focus->resource
is NULL just isn't good enough.
When we have a new client, we potentially set the focus on one of its
surfaces when we map it but the client might not have called
wl_seat.get_keyboard/pointer yet. When it finally calls
get_keyboard/pointer we must then register its resource as the
focus_resource which means that we can only return early if
focus_resource is already set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719725
Grabs are now slice allocated structures that are handled by
whoever starts the grab. They contain a generic grab structure
with the interface and a backpointer to the MetaWaylandPointer.
The grab interface has been changed to pass full clutter events,
which allowed to remove the confusion between grab->focus and
pointer->focus. Invidual grabs are now required to keep their
focus, and choose whoever gets the events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707863
Use the new Clutter hook to make sure the pointer never enters
the dead area caused by the different monitor sizes.
You don't realize how much X is doing for you until you lose it...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706655
We had an assertion in meta_wayland_surface_free() that after
a repick() we would not choose the freed surface, but that didn't
consider surfaces destroyed while holding the implicit pointer
grab (ie, because the user clicked on the X button). In that case,
we need to bypass the grab infrastructure and explicitly unfocus
the dead surface.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706982
Calling XIGrabDevice has no effect under wayland, because the
xserver is getting events from us. Instead, we need to use our
own interfaces for grabs.
At the same time, we can simplify the public API, as plugins
should always listen for events using clutter.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705917
We need to track the full xkb_state to have the necessary information
to send to the clients, otherwise they may get confused and lock
or invert the modifiers. In the evdev backend, we just retrieve the
same state object that clutter is using, while in the other backends
we fake the state using what clutter is providing (which is a subset
of what X11 provides, which would be necessary to have full state)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705862
We need to track the full xkb_state to have the necessary information
to send to the clients, otherwise they may get confused and lock
or invert the modifiers. In the evdev backend, we just retrieve the
same state object that clutter is using, while in the other backends
we fake the state using what clutter is providing (which is a subset
of what X11 provides, which would be necessary to have full state)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705862
The previous code was leaving focus fields dirty in MetaWaylandPointer
and MetaWaylandKeyboard at time (which could crash the X server
because of invalid object IDs)
The new code is more tighly integrated in the normal X11 code
for handling keyboard focus (meaning that the core idea of input
focus is also correct now), so that meta_window_unmanage() can
do the right thing. As a side benefit, clicking on wayland clients
now unfocus X11 clients.
For the mouse focus, we need to clear the surface pointer when
the metawindowactor is destroyed (even if the actual actor is
kept alive for effects), so that a repick finds a different pointer
focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705859
This copies the basic input support from the Clayland demo compositor.
It adds a basic wl_seat implementation which can convert Clutter mouse
events to Wayland events. For this to work all of the wayland surface
actors need to be made reactive.
The wayland keyboard input focus surface is updated whenever Mutter
sees a FocusIn event so that it will stay in synch with whatever
surface Mutter wants as the focus. Wayland surfaces don't get this
event so for now it will just give them focus whenever they are
clicked as a hack to test the code.
Authored-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
Authored-by: Giovanni Campagna <gcampagna@src.gnome.org>
