In X11 when we switch to another tty all the the signals are blocked (as
the display fd is not replying back to polling, causing the main loop to
stop), and they are all handled once we switch back to the tty.
This is not a problem for most of external events, but in case of
accelerometer changes, once we reactivate a mutter session we'll get
them all together, causing lots of monitor reconfigurations leading to
black screen for some seconds and most of the times to a wrong
configuration being applied.
To avoid this, batch all these events using an idle to only apply the
last one we got in a loop.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1217
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
Create a test system bus and use it to run all the tests, add a mock
SensorsProxy (via dbusmock template) server that implements the
net.hadess.SensorProxy interface.
To make testing easier, the service is created on request of a proxy for
it, whose lifetime controls the mock service lifetime as well.
This is done using a further mock service that is used to manage the
others, using python-dbusmock to simplify the handling.
Add basic tests for the orientation manager.
As per the usage dbusmock, we're now launching all the tests under such
wrapper, so that local dbus environment won't ever considered, and
there's no risk that it may affect the tests results both locally and in
CI.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
When we get an orientation event we don't care about keeping track of the
configuration changes, but actually we can consider the new configuration
just a variant of the previous one, adapted to floating device hardware
events, so we only want to apply it if possible, but we don't want to keep
a record of it for reverting capabilities.
Doing that would in fact, break the ability of reverting back to an actual
temporary or persistent configuration.
For example when device orientation events happen while we're waiting for
an user resolution change confirmation, we would save our new rotated
configuration in the history, making then impossible to revert back to
the original persistent one.
So in such case, don't keep track of those configurations in the history,
but only keep track of the last one as current, checking whether the
new current is child or sibling of the previously one.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1221
Related to: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/646
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
and the subsurface was not previously detached from it using
`wl_subsurface_destroy()`.
Without 'window-actor/wayland: Remove subsurface actors on dispose' this
test would fail.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1958>
Monitor configuration check tests can be very complex and in case of
failures we can't easily catch where a failure happened without entering
in debug mode, something that isn't always an option in CI or external
builders.
So add more debug statements in configuration check functions and use
macros to ensure that we print the caller function and location on more
complex check functions.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/522>
Verify that the suggested monitor configuration contains only adjacent monitors,
and that if this is not the case we fallback to the linear configuration.
This can happen in case of multi-DPI setup, so add a test checking this too.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/522>
With some resolutions (such as 4096x2160) we may compute duplicated
scale factors because we used a too wide threshold to check for an
applicable value.
In fact, while when we're at the first and last values it's fine to
search applicable values up to SCALE_FACTORS_STEP, on intermediate ones
we should stop in the middle of it, or we're end up overlapping the
previous scaling value domain.
In the said example in fact we were returning 2.666667 both when
looking to a scaling value close to 2.75 and 3.00 as the upper bound of
2.75 (3.0) was overlapping with the lower bound of 3.0 (2.75).
With the current code, the lower and upper bounds will be instead 2.875.
Adapt test to this, and this allows to also ensure that we're always
returning a sorted and unique list of scales (which is useful as also
g-c-c can ensure that this is true).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
Scaling values computation code served us well in the past years but
it's quite delicate and it has some issues in edge cases, so add a test
that verifies that the computed scaling values for all the most common
resolutions (and some that may be common in future) are what we expect
to be.
This may also serve us in future when we'd define a better algorithm to
compute the preferred scale, but this not the day.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
This will require some symbol exporting, but the benefit is that have
better control of what external test cases can do in terms of creating
more testing specific contexts.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
This makes it possible to declare the type in an installed header (so
that e.g. META_CONTEXT_TEST(context) works), but without having to
expose the MetaContextClass struct.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
As with the compositor type enum, also have the X11 display policy enum,
as it's also effectively part of the context configuration. But as with
the compositor type, move it to a header file for enums only, and since
this is a private one, create a private variant meta-enums.h.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
Since this tests the `--virtual-monitor` command line argument, it uses
the `MetaContextMain` variant of the context, as it's there that command
line argument is handled.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
The clutter tests neeed to start and stop, thus uses their own main loop
instead of the one in MetaContext. Shouldn't matter, since nothing
in mutter should happen that makes the test self-terminate from inside
mutter.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
Users can add option entries, and it'll be part of the configuration
phase.
Create the main group manually to be able to set a user_data pointer;
this will be required to not have to rely on globals when parsing
options using a callback.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
This intends to replace the call to `meta_register_with_session()` that
deals with X11 session management, and is called when the user is
"ready". In thet test context, doing that makes no sense, so make it a
no-op.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
