Break down the beautiful core/ui abstraction barrier by inserting
a pointer to MetaWindow into a MetaUIFrame. I'm a scoundrel, I know.
We'll use this very soon to destroy meta_core_get.
Whenever we added a frame to the GHashTable, we added the frame itself
as the value, and a pointer to its storage of the frame window XID,
as the key.
When we iterated over the hash table, we actually looked up the
MetaUIFrame in the key, which might seem extraordinarily wrong, but
eagle-eyed viewers might notice that the XID is the first field in
MetaUIFrame, so the key and value are actually the same pointer.
Changing the layout of MetaUIFrame at all causes this to go haywire,
so let's not do this and simply put the MetaUIFrame in the value,
as expected.
When the frame type updates, we were doing something funky that
caused us to reset the title used for the text layout here. I can't
really think of any place that it would trigger, and in testing I
haven't hit this either, so let's just remove the fancy logic and
assert this.
With support for the old metacity theme format gone, there's no
reason to keep storing theme information in terms of the old theme
properties. Just store the padding/border information for each
element directly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
MetaFrameStyle now only holds a MetaFrameLayout, so we can cut out
the middle man and use the layout directly. And as we are already
using a single style/layout per frame set and handle frame state
and focus by setting appropriate style flags, MetaFrameStyleSet
is pointless too - just store one MetaFrameLayout per frame type
directly in the theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Rest in peace you magnificent format, love-child of arcane X11 drawing
API and markup craze, you will not be missed.
We do remember however the bravery of a many men and women, who fearlessly
descended into the guts of your intrinsics and turned ugliness into beauty;
their work will still be spoken of when you will long have been forgotten.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
All geometry/drawing information is now picked up from the GTK+ theme,
so replace the remaining bits (hide_buttons + title_scale) with
hardcoded values from the default Adwaita theme and stop loading
the metacity theme altogether.
If there is a need to theme those constants again in the future,
we should make them available from GTK+ where they are available
for client-side decorations as well. They certainly don't justify
maintaining support for a complex theme format.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Few themes ever had support for those in the first place, and even
less supported them properly; in particular support in the default
theme has been broken for a while now.
With this in mind (and considering that not even the tweak tool exposes
any UI to configure them), let's (try to) remove support altogether - the
corresponding rects are still kept around, so it's easy to add back in
case we reconsider (and get the necessary artwork).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
GTK+ doesn't deal with different frame types for its client-side
decorations - it just treats dialogs the same as normal windows
and ignores the odder frame types like UTILITY and MENU. That's
fine as those have largely gone out of fashion anyway, but it's a
different case for the WM - we still have to support them somehow.
For now, just apply the existing title_scale factor to the geometry
information picked up from the theme in addition to the title font.
If it turns out that there's demand for something more sophisticated,
we can still consider adding wm-only style information to the GTK+
theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
The frame shape is relevant in three places:
- the window decoration we draw
- the frame mask (used for the shape region)
- the frame bounds (used for clipping)
All three should match, so make sure to use the same GTK+ method for
the first two, and bring the (non-antialiased) third closer to the
other two by removing an obscure modifier from the corner radius.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
We now have everything in place to pick up geometry and drawing
information from GTK+ rather than the metacity theme, so do just
that; the metacity theme is now only used for some constants
(title_scale, hide_buttons, ...), which we will replace soon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
We want to eventually pick up all theme information from GTK+ instead
of our own theme format; to prepare for this, add another helper method
to fill in geometry information from the GTK+ theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
GTK+ expresses the window state as style classes and widget state for
client-side decorations. Add a helper method to translate our own frame
state to the corresponding changes to the style context hierarchy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Sounds obvious, doesn't it?
After this change when titlebar-uses-system-font is set, the "system
font" used will not be a generic one, but match what GTK+ uses in
client-side decorations.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
In order to pick up all theme information from GTK+, a single style
context is not enough; a style hierarchy that closely matches the widget
hierarchy by GTK+'s client-side decorations will allow this soon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Our current use of style contexts is fairly limited - we don't
use them for much more than picking up some color information.
We will soon start to make more elaborate use of GTK style
information, but a single context will no longer be enough
to draw a frame then.
To prepare for this, add a simple ref-counted type to wrap
style information.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Rather than defining the space to the left and right of buttons, add a
simple spacing property that defines the space between buttons, which is
what GTK+ does for client-side decorations (e.g. GtkButtons in a GtkBox).
Unfortunately the value is hardcoded in GTK+; if it is exposed in the
theme in the future, we should pick it up from there, but for now we
just use the same value as GTK+.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Basically it's odd to have "button_rect" be a function with all the
foo_rect GdkRectangles around - renaming to get_button_rect() will
free the name for the generically named "rect" once buttons are the
only movable pieces in the frame.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
Since GTK+ commit 3a337156d11a86c7, save()/restore() may only be
used for subelements; in this particular case, the change broke
the backdrop state in decorations. Luckily we don't actually need
the save()/restore() pair anyway, as we only touch the context's
state and always set it explicitly.
From a quick code search and grep of gnome-themes-standard, none of
the themes that I inspected used this feature. Since it's the last
thing that uses a lot of old legacy GdkPixbuf code, I'd rather just
consider the feature unsupported at this point and clean up everything
I need to.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662962
For reasons related to interaction between the GTK+ CSS code and the
frame sync protocol, the dummy GtkWindow that MetaUI creates to track
theme properties has to be mapped and have MetaWindow associated with it.
Add a private function so that the test framework can filter this out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
This way the xserver never paints the frame background, even if
the client window is destroyed. This allows us to have clean
destroy window animation.
There is no problem with interactive resizing because applications
are using the XSync protocol, so we're not painting unless the
client has redrawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734054
When a passive touch grab is rejected over the frame, management is punted to
the frame itself, and pointer events emulated, but the attempt to transfer the
grab from the GDK connection to the Clutter one fails with AlreadyGrabbed, and
will fail until the Clutter connection receives the XI_TouchEnd resulting from
XIRejectTouch, gotten after the XI_ButtonPress on the GDK connection.
In order to bypass this shortcoming, store the current grab operation on the
frame as long as the button is pressed, so it is retried once on the next
motion event happening during frame dragging, that will have a recent enough
timestamp to succeed. If no grabbing succeeded, the current grab operation
data will be reset on GDK_BUTTON_RELEASE.
Designers got used to RGBA support in GTK+, so the colors we pick
up from there might well have an alpha channel; update our gradient
rendering to support this - eventually we should probably port that
code to cairo ...
Since GTK+ already clips to the extended region for us, there's no need
to combine the two. This does lose the fast-path, but I don't actually
expect this to fire, as when we're composited, we really won't ever get
partial exposes.
mutter is quite bad at using GTK+ correctly, relying on dumb things
like the single-buffering stuff. Hack up a temporary fix for the
newer GTK+ rendering changes.
While the comment claims that we may want to keep this around
for optimization purposes, the operations are raw bitmap operations
that would be cleaner done in cairo.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662962
prelit_control is used for both prelight and pressed states, so the early
return in update_prelit_control() misses the case where prelit_control
already matches the control we are updating, but its state is PRESSED
rather than PRELIGHT. Fix the condition to not have pressed controls
linger around erroneously.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731058
Since window menus have been moved to the compositor, the pressed
state of the corresponding window buttons is messed up, as it is
reset immediately when getting a LeaveNotify event due to the
compositor taking a grab. Fix this by ignoring that particular
event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731058
When opening the window menu without an associated control - e.g.
by right-clicking the titlebar or by keyboard - using coordinates
for the menu position is appropriate. However when the menu is
associated with a window button, the expected behavior in the
shell can be implemented much easier with the full button geometry:
the menu will point to the center of the button's bottom edge
rather than align to the left/right side of the titlebar as it
does now, and the clickable area where a release event does not
dismiss the menu will match the actual clickable area in mutter.
So add an additional show_window_menu_for_rect() function and
use it when opening the menu from a button.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731058
We have two different coordinate spaces here. One is the rectangle
returned by meta_window_get_frame_rect, which is called the "frame
rect" or "the window geometry", which includes visible frame borders
but not invisible frame borders. The other is "frame->rect" which
corresponds to the frame's server geometry. That is, it includes
both visible and invisible frame borders.
These two were of course the same until we introduced invisible
frame borders, and an executive decision was made to make
meta_window_get_frame_rect return the rectangle bounding the
visible portions of the frame.
As time went on, the "frame rect" turned out to be more useful when
making decisions upon, since the user often doesn't think about the
invisible window geometry as part of the window.
We already calculate what amounts to the "frame rect" in the theme
code, so just change META_CORE_GET_FRAME_RECT to consume that
directly.
Since we're going to be calling meta_window_get_frame_rect in here
soon, I'd rather it be one method call, rather than two. We can't
put it at the toplevel, since that might cause infinite recursion
(e.g. meta_core_get calls meta_window_get_frame_rect calls
meta_ui_get_frame_borders calls meta_core_get, ...)
The last commit added support for the "appmenu" button in decorations,
but didn't actually implement it. Add a new MetaWindowMenuType parameter
to the show_window_menu () functions and use it to ask the compositor
to display the app menu when the new button is activated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730752
We want to synchronize the button layouts of our server side
decorations and GTK+'s client side ones. However each currently
may contain buttons not supported by the other, which makes this
unnecessarily tricky.
So add support for a new "appmenu" button in the layout, to display
the fallback app menu in the decorations.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730752
It looks weird to have Alt+Space pop up under the cursor instead
of the top-left corner of the window, and the Wayland request will
pass through the coordinates as well.
Add it to the compositor interface, and extend the
_GTK_SHOW_WINDOW_MENU ClientMessage to support it as well.
We already do it in the theme code, but not the actual WM code. Since
we include the left/right borders, it only seems fair to include the
bottom border.
This effectively makes it so that shading a window means that the
client window "slot" has 0 height.
Grab operations are now always taken on the backend connection, and
this breaks GTK+'s event handling.
Instead of taking a grab op, just do the handling ourselves. The
GTK+ connection will get an implicit grab, which means pointer /
keyboard events won't be sent to the rest of mutter, which is good.
It's been long enough. We can mandate support for these, at least
at build-time. The code doesn't actually compile without either
of these, so just consider that unsupported.
This has one regression: the basic touch support added by
Carlos Garnacho in 991c85f is now partially reverted, since
we ported to Clutter events for this. We'll need to either
port his changes to Clutter, or restructure event handling
in mutter directly.
We can't really support the Gtk+ automatic scaling, as to much
code relies on the GdkWindow and XWindow sizes, etc to match.
In order to keep working we just disable the scaling, meaning
we will pick up the larger fonts, but nothing else. Its not
ideal but it works for now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706388
The reason we don't simply use gdk_window_add_filter directly is
because of some twisted idea that any GDK symbol being used from
core/ is a layer violation. While we certainly want to keep any
serious GDK code out of ui/, event handling is quite important
to have in core/, so simply use a GDK event filter directly.
