A user may have configured an output to be panning, e.g. using xrandr
--output <output> --mode <mode> --panning <size>. Respect this by making
the logical monitor use the panning size, instead of the mode. This
makes e.g. makes the background cover the whole panning size, and panels
etc will cover the whole top of the panned area, instead of just the top
left part covering the monitor if having panned to (0, 0).
No support is added to configuring panning, i.e. a panned monitor
configuration cannot be stored in monitors.xml.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/1085
To make it more reliable to distinguish between values that are read
from the backend implementation (which is likely to be irrelevant for
anything but the backend implementation), split out those values (e.g.
layout).
This changes the meaning of what was MetaCrtc::rect, to a
MetaCrtcConfig::layout which is the layout the CRTC has in the global
coordinate space.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/1042
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
In order to eventually support multilpe GPUs with their own connectors,
split out related meta data management (i.e. outputs, CRTCs and CRTC
modes) into a new MetaGpu GObject.
The Xrandr backend always assumes there is always only a single "GPU" as
the GPU is abstracted by the X server; only the native backend (aside
from the test backend) will eventually see more than one GPU.
The Xrandr backend still moves some management to MetaGpuXrandr, in
order to behave more similarly to the KMS counterparts.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785381
Move code dealing with Xrandr MetaCrtcs and related functionality to its
own file. Eventually, MetaCrtcCrtc should be introduced, based on
MetaCrtc, and this commit is in preparation for that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785381
