Monitor configuration check tests can be very complex and in case of
failures we can't easily catch where a failure happened without entering
in debug mode, something that isn't always an option in CI or external
builders.
So add more debug statements in configuration check functions and use
macros to ensure that we print the caller function and location on more
complex check functions.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/522>
Scaling values computation code served us well in the past years but
it's quite delicate and it has some issues in edge cases, so add a test
that verifies that the computed scaling values for all the most common
resolutions (and some that may be common in future) are what we expect
to be.
This may also serve us in future when we'd define a better algorithm to
compute the preferred scale, but this not the day.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
Now set as a property during construction. Only actually set by the
Xrandr backend, as it's the only one currently not supporting all
transforms, which is the default.
While at it, move the 'ALL_TRANFORMS' macro to meta-monitor-tranforms.h.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1287
It's very useful to have common functions for easily creating a monitor
test setup for all kinds of tests, so move create_monitor_test_setup()
and check_monitor_configuration() and all the structs those are using to
monitor-test-utils.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1243
So far some basic testing, including:
* Test that the migrated configuration is applicable
* Test that a monitors.xml with multiple configurations are translated
* Test rotation
* Test tiled monitor discovery (well, test a made up tiled monitor
configuration since I don't have a real one)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732
Both the monitor unit tests and monitor store unit tests will want to
check whether the config manager is used and set custom configuration
files.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777732