This way the xserver never paints the frame background, even if
the client window is destroyed. This allows us to have clean
destroy window animation.
There is no problem with interactive resizing because applications
are using the XSync protocol, so we're not painting unless the
client has redrawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734054
Connecting to size-changed is wrong -- size-changed tells us when
we *told* the X server or resize the window. For X11, we're sort of
guaranteed that the surface will be updated at some point before the
next frame, but for Xwayland, we can't be sure that the new surface is
attached at this point.
This fixes weird artifacts when resizing apps like xclock.
This was wrong for subsurfaces that extend beyond the parent's shape,
since the paint volume would be wrong in this case. Instead of using the
shape region which can be out of date and wrong, just use the union of
our children's volumes, which is a lot easier to manage.
Refuse to create a touch resource if we don't have the capability
(for misbehaving clients), and don't attempt to use touch data
structures that are not initialized.
This is a terrible hack. We need to figure out a better way to do
interactive resizes.
This fixes weird resizing from the left bugs when using GTK+, which is
really slow at acking configures.
This is an easy way to get into an infinite loop where we're constantly
re-sending stuff to the window. If it worked once, it probably won't
work again.
We assume in meta_window_wayland_move_resize that the next commit that
changes the geometry will always be for our next pending operation, so
if we have a move pending on a resize, the next commit will trigger the
move. This is, of course, fundamentally wrong.
We broke this assumption even more now that we don't fizzle out calls to
meta_window_move_resize_internal and now call it on every commit, which
means that a simple damage and then commit would complete a pending
move.
This was even broken by apps like weston-terminal, which, when clicking
on the maximize button, first redraws the terminal with the maximize
button state back on hover on press, and would only redraw when it got
the configure event with the coordinates.
To track the correct commit to apply the move for, we implement the
ack_configure request and ignore all move/resizes that happen before
that.
Right now, we actually fizzle out the entire move/resize if there's a
future pending configure we're waiting on.
Sometimes we can get a host event without having the display up and
running yet. Just don't pass it to the compositor in that case, since it
won't be possible for it to have any event that matters.
MetaGestureTracker has been separating the "did I handle an event?" and the
"should the event be filtered out?" questions, merge this and make
handle_event() reply to "should the event be only handled by me?".
If a sequence wasn't accepted yet by the gesture tracker, the event will
go through (eg. not handled exclusively by the gesture tracker) and it'll
still be processed by Clutter, triggering gesture actions, and maybe
changing the sequence into other state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
The grabbing state is now checked for both pointer/touch devices
within the seat, and the grab start coordinates returned by
meta_wayland_seat_get_grab_info().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
On X11 this works because only emulated pointer events are listened for. On
wayland, the single touch behavior must be enforced in touch events, ignoring
every other sequence.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
This function tells the obvious on X11, and implements a similar mechanism
on wayland to determine the "pointer emulating" sequence, or one to stick
with when implementing single-touch behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
Due to the way the MetaGestureTracker processes every touch event, this
will tell as closely to Clutter as possible the current number of touches
happening on the stage.
Even though, this is subject to windowing behavior, on X11, rejected touches
will be soon followed by a XI_TouchEnd event, so the compositor will stop
seeing touch sequences that are still operating on clients. On wayland, touch
sequences are processed by the compositor during all their lifetime, so these
will stay on the MetaGestureTracker with META_SEQUENCE_PENDING_END state, yet
still tracked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
On wayland, touches are initially both handled by the compositor and sent
to clients, proceeding to cancellation on clients only after the compositor
claims the sequence for itself. Implement the cancellation detail through
MetaGestureTracker::state-changed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
The capability flags are determined from the device types of the slave devices
that are currently attached. This also happens whenever a device is added or
removed, so the capabilities are kept up to date, and clients know about these.
On VT switch, all slave devices are temporarily removed, so the cascade of
signals will make the seat end up with capabililities=0 while input is suspended.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733563
Anytime the keymap is changed, either directly, or indirectly through the
keyboard capability being released/initialized, there should be a
notification of the modifiers being changed too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733563
