When we changed the setting of the buffer rect to be inside the moving
code to make sure it was updated in places we were moving directly
without any round-trip needed, I removed a code to set the buffer rect
without remembering that's where the size of it was updated.
Add back the code to update the buffer rect.
This fixes Wayland windows not appearing.
GTK+ likes to set these, well, _NET_WM_OPAQUE_REGION in particular, to
the same value. Save some expensive and processing when this happens. We
should probably make GTK+ smarter.
The GDK and hence GNOME standard is that keys that begin with XF86 according to
libxkbcommon not prefixed with XF86, though gdk_keyval_from_name() strips XF86
if provided. If libxkbcommon doesn't recognize the accelerator name without
XF86, try again adding XF86 to the start.
This restores compatibility with gnome-settings-daemon, schemas, and existing
user configuration.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727993
This signal is emitted the first time a frame of contents of the
window is completed by the application and has been drawn on the
screen. This is meant to be used for performance measurement of
application startup.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732343
It just gets in the way of gnome-shell's log handler (which
includes gjs backtraces optionally), it requires people to understand
what 8 or 16 mean as log levels, and it loses the log domain.
It returns FALSE when button_count is not 0. But grabbing for
move/resize is activated by clicking the button, so this condition
disallows the wayland clients to be moved/resized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731237
Some plugins and extensions want to be able to know when the sticky
field of a window changes, so add a property for it and allow them
to connect to the notify::on-all-workspaces signal.
When workspaces-only-on-primary is set and a window is moved back to the
primary, we also move it to the active workspace to avoid the confusion
of a visible window suddenly disappearing when crossing the monitor border.
However when the window is not actually moved by the user, preserving the
workspace makes more sense - we already do this in some cases (e.g. when
moving between primary monitors), but miss others (unplugging the previous
monitor); just add an explicit user_op parameter as used elsewhere to cover
all exceptions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731760
Remember the last monitor a window was moved to by user action and
try to move it back on monitor changes; this should match user
expectations much better when a monitor is unplugged temporarily.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731760
When workspaces-only-on-primary is set, a window can be on all
workspaces either because it is on a non-primary workspace, or
because it was explicitly made sticky. Only the latter is reflected
in _NET_WM_STATE, but both will result in a "magic" _NET_WM_DESKTOP,
which we (and probably other WMs) use to set the initial sticky state.
So to avoid confusing other WMs (or ourselves), make sure to only
have _NET_WM_STATE_STICKY reflected in _NET_WM_DESKTOP when unmanaging.
Window state like maximization and minimization should be preserved
over restarts - in a patch review, this would qualify as "needs-work",
so revert the cleanup until the issues are fixed.
This reverts commit dc6decefb5.
Since GTK+ already clips to the extended region for us, there's no need
to combine the two. This does lose the fast-path, but I don't actually
expect this to fire, as when we're composited, we really won't ever get
partial exposes.
mutter is quite bad at using GTK+ correctly, relying on dumb things
like the single-buffering stuff. Hack up a temporary fix for the
newer GTK+ rendering changes.
Rather than calculate it speculatively with the current properties
which may be too new or too out of date, make sure it always fits
with the proper definition. We update it when we update the toplevel
window for X11, and when a Wayland surface is committed with a newly
attached buffer.
With get_input_region existing, get_input_rect is a misnomer. Really,
it's about the geometry of the output surface, and it's only used that
way in the compositor code.
Way back when in GNOME 3.2, get_input_rect was added when we added
invisible borders. get_outer_rect was always synonymous with server-side
geometry of the toplevel. get_outer_rect was used for both user-side
policy (the "frame rect") and to get the geometry of the window.
Invisible borders were meant to extend the input region of the frame
window silently. Since most users of get_outer_rect cared about the
frame rect, we kept that the same and added a new method, get_input_rect
to get the full rect of the framed window with all invisible borders for
input kept on.
As time went on and CSD and Wayland became a reality, the relationship
between the server-side geometry and the "frame rect" became more
complicated, as can be evidenced by the recent commits. Since clients
don't tend to be framed anymore, they set their own input region.
get_buffer_rect is also sort of a poor name, since X11 doesn't really
have buffers, but we don't really have many other alternatives.
This doesn't change any of the code, nor the meaning. It will always
refer to the rectangle where the toplevel should be placed.
All of the users of get_input_rect don't actually want a synthesized
input rect based off of the current margins. What they really want is
the last-configured size of the toplevel window.
Since we don't properly track this anymore in the generic MetaWindow,
use XGetWindowAttributes to fetch a server-side rectangle. This is a
bad layer violation, but since the window geometry code will have to
be rewritten anyway for the Wayland set_window_geometry, let's just
push a hacky fix for now.
While the comment claims that we may want to keep this around
for optimization purposes, the operations are raw bitmap operations
that would be cleaner done in cairo.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662962
Struts are defined in terms of screen edges, so expand the rectangles
we get via set_builtin_struts() accordingly. However we do want to
allow chrome on edges between monitors, in which case the expansion
would render an entire monitor unusable - don't expand the rectangles
in that case, which means we will only use them for constraining
windows but ignore them for the client-visible _NET_WORKAREA property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730527
Like the _NET_WM_STRUT/_NET_WM_STRUT_PARTIAL client properties,
_NET_WORKAREA is defined in terms of screen geometry rather than
taking individual monitors into account. However we do want to
allow system chrome to be attached to a monitor edge rather than
a screen edges under some circumstances. As not all clients can
be assumed to deal gracefully with the resulting workarea, use
those "struts" only internally for constraining windows, but
ignore them when exporting _NET_WORKAREA.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730527
Since commit 8b2b65246a, we assume that the compositor always
exists. Alas, the assumption is wrong - the compositor is currently
initialized after the screen, but meta_screen_new() itself may
call a compositor function if initialization involves a workspace
switch (which will happen when meta_workspace_activate() is called
more than once and for different workspaces - or in other words,
when _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP is set and not 0).
So carefully split out the offending bits and only call them after
the compositor has been initialized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731332
