Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Neil Roberts
4f6fe6f0e2 Fixes for --disable-glib
This fixes some problems which were stopping --disable-glib from
working properly:

• A lot of the public headers were including glib.h. This shouldn't be
  necessary because the API doesn't expose any glib types. Otherwise
  any apps would require glib in order to get the header.

• The public headers were using G_BEGIN_DECLS. There is now a
  replacement macro called COGL_BEGIN_DECLS which is defined in
  cogl-types.h.

• A similar fix has been done for G_GNUC_NULL_TERMINATED and
  G_GNUC_DEPRECATED.

• The CFLAGS were not including $(builddir)/deps/glib which was
  preventing it finding the generated glibconfig.h when building out
  of tree.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 4138b3141c2f39cddaea3d72bfc04342ed5092d0)
2013-01-22 17:48:05 +00:00
Tomeu Vizoso
93d0de1d9a Mass rename CLUTTER_COMPILATION to COGL_COMPILATION
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit a99512e5798e48ffa3a9a1a7eb98bc55647ee1b6)
2012-08-06 14:27:45 +01:00
Robert Bragg
54735dec84 Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.

Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.

Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.

So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.

Instead of gsize we now use size_t

For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.

Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-08-06 14:27:39 +01:00
Robert Bragg
09642a83b5 Removes all remaining use of CoglHandle
Removing CoglHandle has been an on going goal for quite a long time now
and finally this patch removes the last remaining uses of the CoglHandle
type and the cogl_handle_ apis.

Since the big remaining users of CoglHandle were the cogl_program_ and
cogl_shader_ apis which have replaced with the CoglSnippets api this
patch removes both of these apis.

Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 6ed3aaf4be21d605a1ed3176b3ea825933f85cf0)

  Since the original patch was done after removing deprecated API
  this back ported patch doesn't affect deprecated API and so
  actually this cherry-pick doesn't remove all remaining use of
  CoglHandle as it did for the master branch of Cogl.
2012-08-06 14:27:39 +01:00
Neil Roberts
7114588884 Add the missing cast macros for some buffer objects
CoglPixelBuffer, CoglAttributeBuffer and CoglIndexBuffer were missing
public cast macros.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
2012-03-05 18:47:52 +00:00
Robert Bragg
3ea6acc072 buffer: explicitly relate buffers to a context
All CoglBuffer constructors now take an explicit CoglContext
constructor. This is part of the on going effort to adapt to Cogl API so
it no longer depends on a global, default context.

Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2012-02-09 14:28:02 +00:00
Robert Bragg
bf7653ac93 Rename CoglIndexArray to CoglIndexBuffer
This is part of a broader cleanup of some of the experimental Cogl API.
One of the reasons for this particular rename is to switch away from
using the term "Array" which implies a regular, indexable layout which
isn't the case. We also want to strongly imply a relationship between
CoglBuffers and CoglIndexBuffers and be consistent with the
CoglAttributeBuffer and CoglPixelBuffer APIs.
2011-05-16 14:31:31 +01:00