As the first step into removing Cogl types that are covered by
Graphene, remove CoglEuler and replace it by graphene_euler_t.
This is a mostly straightforward replacement, except that the
naming conventions changed a bit. Cogl uses "heading" for the
Y axis, "pitch" for the X axis, and "roll" for the Z axis, and
graphene uses the axis themselves. That means the 1st and 2nd
arguments need to be swapped.
Also adapt the matrix stack to store a graphene_euler_t in the
rotation node -- that simplifies the code a bit as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/458
Graphene is a small library with data types and APIs
specially crafted to computer graphics. It contains
performant implementations of matrices, vectors, points
and rotation tools. It is performance because, among
other reasons, it uses vectorized processor commands
to compute various operations.
Add Graphene dependency to Mutter.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/458
Meson 0.50.0 made passing an absolute path to install_headers()'
subdir keyword a fatal error. This means we have to track both
relative (to includedir) paths for header subdirs and absolute
paths for generated headers now :-(
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/492
pkg-config files for mutter are generated using *_pkg_deps as requires, but
programs linked with libmutter doesn't need most of these private dependencies
which are only needed for building and linking mutter and its subprojects.
So list packages needed only by mutter itself inside *_pkg_private_deps and
don't expose such packages to pkg-config, but only use them at build time.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/3955
This commit adds meson build support to mutter. It takes a step away
from the three separate code bases with three different autotools setups
into a single meson build system. There are still places that can be
unified better, for example by removing various "config.h" style files
from cogl and clutter, centralizing debug C flags and other configurable
macros, and similar artifacts that are there only because they were once
separate code bases.
There are some differences between the autotools setup and the new
meson. Here are a few:
The meson setup doesn't generate wrapper scripts for various cogl and
clutter test cases. What these tests did was more or less generate a
tiny script that called an executable with a test name as the argument.
To run particular tests, just run the test executable with the name of
the test as the argument.
The meson setup doesn't install test files anymore. The autotools test
suite was designed towards working with installed tests, but it didn't
really still, and now with meson, it doesn't install anything at all,
but instead makes sure that everything runs with the uninstalled input
files, binaries and libraries when running the test suite. Installable
tests may come later.
Tests from cogl, clutter and mutter are run on 'meson test'. In
autotools, only cogl and clutter tests were run on 'make check'.
