mutter/cogl/cogl-journal-private.h

57 lines
2.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Cogl
*
* An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
*
* Copyright (C) 2007,2008,2009 Intel Corporation.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*
*/
#ifndef __COGL_JOURNAL_PRIVATE_H
#define __COGL_JOURNAL_PRIVATE_H
#include "cogl-handle.h"
/* To improve batching of geometry when submitting vertices to OpenGL we
* log the texture rectangles we want to draw to a journal, so when we
* later flush the journal we aim to batch data, and gl draw calls. */
typedef struct _CoglJournalEntry
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
int n_layers;
CoglMatrix model_view;
/* XXX: These entries are pretty big now considering the padding in
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* CoglPipelineFlushOptions and CoglMatrix, so we might need to optimize this
* later. */
} CoglJournalEntry;
void
_cogl_journal_log_quad (const float *position,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline,
int n_layers,
guint32 fallback_layers,
GLuint layer0_override_texture,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
const CoglPipelineWrapModeOverrides *
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 06:31:33 -04:00
wrap_mode_overrides,
const float *tex_coords,
unsigned int tex_coords_len);
void
_cogl_journal_flush (void);
#endif /* __COGL_JOURNAL_PRIVATE_H */