2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Cogl
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010 Intel Corporation.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|
|
|
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
|
|
|
|
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
|
|
|
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|
|
|
* License along with this library. If not, see
|
|
|
|
* <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Authors:
|
|
|
|
* Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
* Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
|
|
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-13 17:34:30 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "cogl-util.h"
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "cogl-object-private.h"
|
2010-11-04 18:25:52 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "cogl-context-private.h"
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "cogl-indices.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "cogl-indices-private.h"
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
#include "cogl-index-buffer.h"
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdarg.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void _cogl_indices_free (CoglIndices *indices);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGL_OBJECT_DEFINE (Indices, indices);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t
|
|
|
|
sizeof_indices_type (CoglIndicesType type)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (type)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case COGL_INDICES_TYPE_UNSIGNED_BYTE:
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
case COGL_INDICES_TYPE_UNSIGNED_SHORT:
|
|
|
|
return 2;
|
|
|
|
case COGL_INDICES_TYPE_UNSIGNED_INT:
|
|
|
|
return 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_reached (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoglIndices *
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
cogl_indices_new_for_buffer (CoglIndicesType type,
|
|
|
|
CoglIndexBuffer *buffer,
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
size_t offset)
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CoglIndices *indices = g_slice_new (CoglIndices);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
indices->buffer = cogl_object_ref (buffer);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
indices->offset = offset;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indices->type = type;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indices->immutable_ref = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return _cogl_indices_object_new (indices);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoglIndices *
|
2012-02-06 12:08:58 -05:00
|
|
|
cogl_indices_new (CoglContext *context,
|
|
|
|
CoglIndicesType type,
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
const void *indices_data,
|
|
|
|
int n_indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
size_t buffer_bytes = sizeof_indices_type (type) * n_indices;
|
2012-02-06 12:08:58 -05:00
|
|
|
CoglIndexBuffer *index_buffer = cogl_index_buffer_new (context, buffer_bytes);
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
CoglBuffer *buffer = COGL_BUFFER (index_buffer);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
CoglIndices *indices;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cogl_buffer_set_data (buffer,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
indices_data,
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
buffer_bytes);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
indices = cogl_indices_new_for_buffer (type, index_buffer, 0);
|
|
|
|
cogl_object_unref (index_buffer);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return indices;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
CoglIndexBuffer *
|
|
|
|
cogl_indices_get_buffer (CoglIndices *indices)
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
return indices->buffer;
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoglIndicesType
|
|
|
|
cogl_indices_get_type (CoglIndices *indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-10-13 17:34:30 -04:00
|
|
|
_COGL_RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL (cogl_is_indices (indices),
|
|
|
|
COGL_INDICES_TYPE_UNSIGNED_BYTE);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
return indices->type;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
size_t
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
cogl_indices_get_offset (CoglIndices *indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-10-13 17:34:30 -04:00
|
|
|
_COGL_RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL (cogl_is_indices (indices), 0);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return indices->offset;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
warn_about_midscene_changes (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
static CoglBool seen = FALSE;
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
if (!seen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_warning ("Mid-scene modification of indices has "
|
|
|
|
"undefined results\n");
|
|
|
|
seen = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
cogl_indices_set_offset (CoglIndices *indices,
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
size_t offset)
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2011-10-13 17:34:30 -04:00
|
|
|
_COGL_RETURN_IF_FAIL (cogl_is_indices (indices));
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (G_UNLIKELY (indices->immutable_ref))
|
|
|
|
warn_about_midscene_changes ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indices->offset = offset;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
_cogl_indices_free (CoglIndices *indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
cogl_object_unref (indices->buffer);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
g_slice_free (CoglIndices, indices);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoglIndices *
|
|
|
|
_cogl_indices_immutable_ref (CoglIndices *indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-10-13 17:34:30 -04:00
|
|
|
_COGL_RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL (cogl_is_indices (indices), NULL);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indices->immutable_ref++;
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
_cogl_buffer_immutable_ref (COGL_BUFFER (indices->buffer));
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
return indices;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
_cogl_indices_immutable_unref (CoglIndices *indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-10-13 17:34:30 -04:00
|
|
|
_COGL_RETURN_IF_FAIL (cogl_is_indices (indices));
|
|
|
|
_COGL_RETURN_IF_FAIL (indices->immutable_ref > 0);
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indices->immutable_ref--;
|
2011-03-02 18:31:19 -05:00
|
|
|
_cogl_buffer_immutable_unref (COGL_BUFFER (indices->buffer));
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoglIndices *
|
2012-02-06 12:08:58 -05:00
|
|
|
cogl_get_rectangle_indices (CoglContext *ctx, int n_rectangles)
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int n_indices = n_rectangles * 6;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Check if the largest index required will fit in a byte array... */
|
|
|
|
if (n_indices <= 256 / 4 * 6)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Generate the byte array if we haven't already */
|
|
|
|
if (ctx->rectangle_byte_indices == NULL)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
uint8_t *byte_array = g_malloc (256 / 4 * 6 * sizeof (uint8_t));
|
|
|
|
uint8_t *p = byte_array;
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
int i, vert_num = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 256 / 4; i++)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 0;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 1;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 2;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 0;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 2;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 3;
|
|
|
|
vert_num += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx->rectangle_byte_indices
|
2012-02-06 12:08:58 -05:00
|
|
|
= cogl_indices_new (ctx,
|
|
|
|
COGL_INDICES_TYPE_UNSIGNED_BYTE,
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
byte_array,
|
|
|
|
256 / 4 * 6);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_free (byte_array);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ctx->rectangle_byte_indices;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len < n_indices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
uint16_t *short_array;
|
|
|
|
uint16_t *p;
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
int i, vert_num = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ctx->rectangle_short_indices != NULL)
|
|
|
|
cogl_object_unref (ctx->rectangle_short_indices);
|
|
|
|
/* Pick a power of two >= MAX (512, n_indices) */
|
|
|
|
if (ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len == 0)
|
|
|
|
ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len = 512;
|
|
|
|
while (ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len < n_indices)
|
|
|
|
ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len *= 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Over-allocate to generate a whole number of quads */
|
|
|
|
p = short_array = g_malloc ((ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len
|
|
|
|
+ 5) / 6 * 6
|
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.
Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.
Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.
So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.
Instead of gsize we now use size_t
For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
* sizeof (uint16_t));
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Fill in the complete quads */
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len; i += 6)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 0;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 1;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 2;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 0;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 2;
|
|
|
|
*(p++) = vert_num + 3;
|
|
|
|
vert_num += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx->rectangle_short_indices
|
2012-02-06 12:08:58 -05:00
|
|
|
= cogl_indices_new (ctx,
|
|
|
|
COGL_INDICES_TYPE_UNSIGNED_SHORT,
|
2010-10-12 07:48:58 -04:00
|
|
|
short_array,
|
|
|
|
ctx->rectangle_short_indices_len);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_free (short_array);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ctx->rectangle_short_indices;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|