mutter/cogl/cogl-journal.c

1803 lines
61 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Cogl
*
* An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
*
* Copyright (C) 2007,2008,2009 Intel Corporation.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*
*/
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include "config.h"
#endif
#include "cogl.h"
#include "cogl-debug.h"
#include "cogl-internal.h"
#include "cogl-context.h"
#include "cogl-journal-private.h"
#include "cogl-texture-private.h"
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
#include "cogl-pipeline-private.h"
#include "cogl-pipeline-opengl-private.h"
#include "cogl-vertex-buffer-private.h"
#include "cogl-framebuffer-private.h"
#include "cogl-profile.h"
#include "cogl-attribute-private.h"
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
#include "cogl-point-in-poly-private.h"
#include <string.h>
#include <gmodule.h>
#include <math.h>
/* XXX NB:
* The data logged in logged_vertices is formatted as follows:
*
* Per entry:
* 4 RGBA GLubytes for the color
* 2 floats for the top left position
* 2 * n_layers floats for the top left texture coordinates
* 2 floats for the bottom right position
* 2 * n_layers floats for the bottom right texture coordinates
*/
#define GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS(N_LAYERS) \
(N_LAYERS * 2 + 2)
/* XXX NB:
* Once in the vertex array, the journal's vertex data is arranged as follows:
* 4 vertices per quad:
* 2 or 3 GLfloats per position (3 when doing software transforms)
* 4 RGBA GLubytes,
* 2 GLfloats per tex coord * n_layers
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Where n_layers corresponds to the number of pipeline layers enabled
*
* To avoid frequent changes in the stride of our vertex data we always pad
* n_layers to be >= 2
*
* There will be four vertices per quad in the vertex array
*
* When we are transforming quads in software we need to also track the z
* coordinate of transformed vertices.
*
* So for a given number of layers this gets the stride in 32bit words:
*/
#define SW_TRANSFORM (!(cogl_debug_flags & \
COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_TRANSFORM))
#define POS_STRIDE (SW_TRANSFORM ? 3 : 2) /* number of 32bit words */
#define N_POS_COMPONENTS POS_STRIDE
#define COLOR_STRIDE 1 /* number of 32bit words */
#define TEX_STRIDE 2 /* number of 32bit words */
#define MIN_LAYER_PADING 2
#define GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS(N_LAYERS) \
(POS_STRIDE + COLOR_STRIDE + \
TEX_STRIDE * (N_LAYERS < MIN_LAYER_PADING ? MIN_LAYER_PADING : N_LAYERS))
/* If a batch is longer than this threshold then we'll assume it's not
worth doing software clipping and it's cheaper to program the GPU
to do the clip */
#define COGL_JOURNAL_HARDWARE_CLIP_THRESHOLD 8
typedef struct _CoglJournalFlushState
{
CoglJournal *journal;
CoglVertexArray *vertex_array;
GArray *attributes;
int current_attribute;
gsize stride;
size_t array_offset;
GLuint current_vertex;
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GL
CoglIndices *indices;
gsize indices_type_size;
#endif
CoglMatrixStack *modelview_stack;
CoglMatrixStack *projection_stack;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *source;
} CoglJournalFlushState;
typedef void (*CoglJournalBatchCallback) (CoglJournalEntry *start,
int n_entries,
void *data);
typedef gboolean (*CoglJournalBatchTest) (CoglJournalEntry *entry0,
CoglJournalEntry *entry1);
static void _cogl_journal_free (CoglJournal *journal);
COGL_OBJECT_DEFINE (Journal, journal);
static void
_cogl_journal_free (CoglJournal *journal)
{
if (journal->entries)
g_array_free (journal->entries, TRUE);
if (journal->vertices)
g_array_free (journal->vertices, TRUE);
g_slice_free (CoglJournal, journal);
}
CoglJournal *
_cogl_journal_new (void)
{
CoglJournal *journal = g_slice_new0 (CoglJournal);
journal->entries = g_array_new (FALSE, FALSE, sizeof (CoglJournalEntry));
journal->vertices = g_array_new (FALSE, FALSE, sizeof (float));
return _cogl_journal_object_new (journal);
}
static void
_cogl_journal_dump_logged_quad (guint8 *data, int n_layers)
{
gsize stride = GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (n_layers);
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
g_print ("n_layers = %d; rgba=0x%02X%02X%02X%02X\n",
n_layers, data[0], data[1], data[2], data[3]);
data += 4;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
{
float *v = (float *)data + (i * stride);
int j;
g_print ("v%d: x = %f, y = %f", i, v[0], v[1]);
for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++)
{
float *t = v + 2 + TEX_STRIDE * j;
g_print (", tx%d = %f, ty%d = %f", j, t[0], j, t[1]);
}
g_print ("\n");
}
}
static void
_cogl_journal_dump_quad_vertices (guint8 *data, int n_layers)
{
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
gsize stride = GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (n_layers);
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
g_print ("n_layers = %d; stride = %d; pos stride = %d; color stride = %d; "
"tex stride = %d; stride in bytes = %d\n",
n_layers, (int)stride, POS_STRIDE, COLOR_STRIDE,
TEX_STRIDE, (int)stride * 4);
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
float *v = (float *)data + (i * stride);
guint8 *c = data + (POS_STRIDE * 4) + (i * stride * 4);
int j;
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags &
COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_TRANSFORM))
g_print ("v%d: x = %f, y = %f, rgba=0x%02X%02X%02X%02X",
i, v[0], v[1], c[0], c[1], c[2], c[3]);
else
g_print ("v%d: x = %f, y = %f, z = %f, rgba=0x%02X%02X%02X%02X",
i, v[0], v[1], v[2], c[0], c[1], c[2], c[3]);
for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++)
{
float *t = v + POS_STRIDE + COLOR_STRIDE + TEX_STRIDE * j;
g_print (", tx%d = %f, ty%d = %f", j, t[0], j, t[1]);
}
g_print ("\n");
}
}
static void
_cogl_journal_dump_quad_batch (guint8 *data, int n_layers, int n_quads)
{
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
gsize byte_stride = GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (n_layers) * 4;
int i;
g_print ("_cogl_journal_dump_quad_batch: n_layers = %d, n_quads = %d\n",
n_layers, n_quads);
for (i = 0; i < n_quads; i++)
_cogl_journal_dump_quad_vertices (data + byte_stride * 2 * i, n_layers);
}
static void
batch_and_call (CoglJournalEntry *entries,
int n_entries,
CoglJournalBatchTest can_batch_callback,
CoglJournalBatchCallback batch_callback,
void *data)
{
int i;
int batch_len = 1;
CoglJournalEntry *batch_start = entries;
if (n_entries < 1)
return;
for (i = 1; i < n_entries; i++)
{
CoglJournalEntry *entry0 = &entries[i - 1];
CoglJournalEntry *entry1 = entry0 + 1;
if (can_batch_callback (entry0, entry1))
{
batch_len++;
continue;
}
batch_callback (batch_start, batch_len, data);
batch_start = entry1;
batch_len = 1;
}
/* The last batch... */
batch_callback (batch_start, batch_len, data);
}
static void
_cogl_journal_flush_modelview_and_entries (CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
int batch_len,
void *data)
{
CoglJournalFlushState *state = data;
CoglAttribute **attributes;
CoglDrawFlags draw_flags = (COGL_DRAW_SKIP_JOURNAL_FLUSH |
COGL_DRAW_SKIP_PIPELINE_VALIDATION |
COGL_DRAW_SKIP_FRAMEBUFFER_FLUSH |
COGL_DRAW_SKIP_LEGACY_STATE);
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (time_flush_modelview_and_entries,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
"flush: pipeline+entries", /* parent */
"flush: modelview+entries",
"The time spent flushing modelview + entries",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context, time_flush_modelview_and_entries);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_BATCHING))
g_print ("BATCHING: modelview batch len = %d\n", batch_len);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_TRANSFORM))
{
_cogl_matrix_stack_set (state->modelview_stack,
&batch_start->model_view);
_cogl_matrix_stack_flush_to_gl (state->modelview_stack,
COGL_MATRIX_MODELVIEW);
}
attributes = (CoglAttribute **)state->attributes->data;
cogl_push_source (state->source);
if (!_cogl_pipeline_get_real_blend_enabled (state->source))
draw_flags |= COGL_DRAW_COLOR_ATTRIBUTE_IS_OPAQUE;
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GL
/* XXX: it's rather evil that we sneak in the GL_QUADS enum here... */
_cogl_draw_attributes_array (GL_QUADS,
state->current_vertex, batch_len * 4,
attributes,
draw_flags);
#else /* HAVE_COGL_GL */
if (batch_len > 1)
{
_cogl_draw_indexed_attributes_array (COGL_VERTICES_MODE_TRIANGLES,
state->current_vertex * 6 / 4,
batch_len * 6,
state->indices,
attributes,
draw_flags);
}
else
{
_cogl_draw_attributes_array (COGL_VERTICES_MODE_TRIANGLE_FAN,
state->current_vertex, 4,
attributes,
draw_flags);
}
#endif
/* DEBUGGING CODE XXX: This path will cause all rectangles to be
* drawn with a coloured outline. Each batch will be rendered with
* the same color. This may e.g. help with debugging texture slicing
* issues, visually seeing what is batched and debugging blending
* issues, plus it looks quite cool.
*/
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_RECTANGLES))
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
static CoglPipeline *outline = NULL;
guint8 color_intensity;
int i;
CoglAttribute *loop_attributes[2];
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctxt, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
if (outline == NULL)
outline = cogl_pipeline_new ();
/* The least significant three bits represent the three
components so that the order of colours goes red, green,
yellow, blue, magenta, cyan. Black and white are skipped. The
next two bits give four scales of intensity for those colours
in the order 0xff, 0xcc, 0x99, and 0x66. This gives a total
of 24 colours. If there are more than 24 batches on the stage
then it will wrap around */
color_intensity = 0xff - 0x33 * (ctxt->journal_rectangles_color >> 3);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
cogl_pipeline_set_color4ub (outline,
(ctxt->journal_rectangles_color & 1) ?
color_intensity : 0,
(ctxt->journal_rectangles_color & 2) ?
color_intensity : 0,
(ctxt->journal_rectangles_color & 4) ?
color_intensity : 0,
0xff);
cogl_set_source (outline);
loop_attributes[0] = attributes[0]; /* we just want the position */
loop_attributes[1] = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < batch_len; i++)
_cogl_draw_attributes_array (COGL_VERTICES_MODE_LINE_LOOP,
4 * i + state->current_vertex, 4,
loop_attributes,
draw_flags);
/* Go to the next color */
do
ctxt->journal_rectangles_color = ((ctxt->journal_rectangles_color + 1) &
((1 << 5) - 1));
/* We don't want to use black or white */
while ((ctxt->journal_rectangles_color & 0x07) == 0
|| (ctxt->journal_rectangles_color & 0x07) == 0x07);
}
state->current_vertex += (4 * batch_len);
cogl_pop_source ();
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context, time_flush_modelview_and_entries);
}
static gboolean
compare_entry_modelviews (CoglJournalEntry *entry0,
CoglJournalEntry *entry1)
{
/* Batch together quads with the same model view matrix */
/* FIXME: this is nasty, there are much nicer ways to track this
* (at the add_quad_vertices level) without resorting to a memcmp!
*
* E.g. If the cogl-current-matrix code maintained an "age" for
* the modelview matrix we could simply check in add_quad_vertices
* if the age has increased, and if so record the change as a
* boolean in the journal.
*/
if (memcmp (&entry0->model_view, &entry1->model_view,
sizeof (GLfloat) * 16) == 0)
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
/* At this point we have a run of quads that we know have compatible
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* pipelines, but they may not all have the same modelview matrix */
static void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
_cogl_journal_flush_pipeline_and_entries (CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
int batch_len,
void *data)
{
CoglJournalFlushState *state = data;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (time_flush_pipeline_entries,
"flush: texcoords+pipeline+entries", /* parent */
"flush: pipeline+entries",
"The time spent flushing pipeline + entries",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context, time_flush_pipeline_entries);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_BATCHING))
g_print ("BATCHING: pipeline batch len = %d\n", batch_len);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
state->source = batch_start->pipeline;
/* If we haven't transformed the quads in software then we need to also break
* up batches according to changes in the modelview matrix... */
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_TRANSFORM))
{
batch_and_call (batch_start,
batch_len,
compare_entry_modelviews,
_cogl_journal_flush_modelview_and_entries,
data);
}
else
_cogl_journal_flush_modelview_and_entries (batch_start, batch_len, data);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context, time_flush_pipeline_entries);
}
static gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
compare_entry_pipelines (CoglJournalEntry *entry0, CoglJournalEntry *entry1)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
/* batch rectangles using compatible pipelines */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
if (_cogl_pipeline_equal (entry0->pipeline,
entry1->pipeline,
(COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_ALL &
~COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_COLOR),
COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_ALL,
0))
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
/* Since the stride may not reflect the number of texture layers in use
* (due to padding) we deal with texture coordinate offsets separately
* from vertex and color offsets... */
static void
_cogl_journal_flush_texcoord_vbo_offsets_and_entries (
CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
int batch_len,
void *data)
{
CoglJournalFlushState *state = data;
int i;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (time_flush_texcoord_pipeline_entries,
"flush: vbo+texcoords+pipeline+entries", /* parent */
"flush: texcoords+pipeline+entries",
"The time spent flushing texcoord offsets + pipeline "
"+ entries",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context, time_flush_texcoord_pipeline_entries);
/* NB: attributes 0 and 1 are position and color */
for (i = 2; i < state->attributes->len; i++)
cogl_object_unref (g_array_index (state->attributes, CoglAttribute *, i));
g_array_set_size (state->attributes, batch_start->n_layers + 2);
for (i = 0; i < batch_start->n_layers; i++)
{
CoglAttribute **attribute_entry =
&g_array_index (state->attributes, CoglAttribute *, i + 2);
const char *names[] = {
"cogl_tex_coord0_in",
"cogl_tex_coord1_in",
"cogl_tex_coord2_in",
"cogl_tex_coord3_in",
"cogl_tex_coord4_in",
"cogl_tex_coord5_in",
"cogl_tex_coord6_in",
"cogl_tex_coord7_in"
};
char *name;
/* XXX NB:
* Our journal's vertex data is arranged as follows:
* 4 vertices per quad:
* 2 or 3 floats per position (3 when doing software transforms)
* 4 RGBA bytes,
* 2 floats per tex coord * n_layers
* (though n_layers may be padded; see definition of
* GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS for details)
*/
name = i < 8 ? (char *)names[i] :
g_strdup_printf ("cogl_tex_coord%d_in", i);
/* XXX: it may be worth having some form of static initializer for
* attributes... */
*attribute_entry =
cogl_attribute_new (state->vertex_array,
name,
state->stride,
state->array_offset +
(POS_STRIDE + COLOR_STRIDE) * 4 +
TEX_STRIDE * 4 * i,
2,
COGL_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_FLOAT);
if (i >= 8)
g_free (name);
}
batch_and_call (batch_start,
batch_len,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
compare_entry_pipelines,
_cogl_journal_flush_pipeline_and_entries,
data);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context, time_flush_texcoord_pipeline_entries);
}
static gboolean
compare_entry_n_layers (CoglJournalEntry *entry0, CoglJournalEntry *entry1)
{
if (entry0->n_layers == entry1->n_layers)
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
/* At this point we know the stride has changed from the previous batch
* of journal entries */
static void
_cogl_journal_flush_vbo_offsets_and_entries (CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
int batch_len,
void *data)
{
CoglJournalFlushState *state = data;
gsize stride;
int i;
CoglAttribute **attribute_entry;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (time_flush_vbo_texcoord_pipeline_entries,
"flush: clip+vbo+texcoords+pipeline+entries", /* parent */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
"flush: vbo+texcoords+pipeline+entries",
"The time spent flushing vbo + texcoord offsets + "
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
"pipeline + entries",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
time_flush_vbo_texcoord_pipeline_entries);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_BATCHING))
g_print ("BATCHING: vbo offset batch len = %d\n", batch_len);
/* XXX NB:
* Our journal's vertex data is arranged as follows:
* 4 vertices per quad:
* 2 or 3 GLfloats per position (3 when doing software transforms)
* 4 RGBA GLubytes,
* 2 GLfloats per tex coord * n_layers
* (though n_layers may be padded; see definition of
* GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS for details)
*/
stride = GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (batch_start->n_layers);
stride *= sizeof (float);
state->stride = stride;
for (i = 0; i < state->attributes->len; i++)
cogl_object_unref (g_array_index (state->attributes, CoglAttribute *, i));
g_array_set_size (state->attributes, 2);
attribute_entry = &g_array_index (state->attributes, CoglAttribute *, 0);
*attribute_entry = cogl_attribute_new (state->vertex_array,
"cogl_position_in",
stride,
state->array_offset,
N_POS_COMPONENTS,
COGL_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_FLOAT);
attribute_entry = &g_array_index (state->attributes, CoglAttribute *, 1);
*attribute_entry =
cogl_attribute_new (state->vertex_array,
"cogl_color_in",
stride,
state->array_offset + (POS_STRIDE * 4),
4,
COGL_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_UNSIGNED_BYTE);
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GL
state->indices = cogl_get_rectangle_indices (batch_len);
#endif
/* We only create new Attributes when the stride within the
* VertexArray changes. (due to a change in the number of pipeline
* layers) While the stride remains constant we walk forward through
* the above VertexArray using a vertex offset passed to
* cogl_draw_attributes
*/
state->current_vertex = 0;
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_JOURNAL))
{
guint8 *verts;
/* Mapping a buffer for read is probably a really bad thing to
do but this will only happen during debugging so it probably
doesn't matter */
verts = (cogl_buffer_map (COGL_BUFFER (state->vertex_array),
COGL_BUFFER_ACCESS_READ, 0) +
state->array_offset);
_cogl_journal_dump_quad_batch (verts,
batch_start->n_layers,
batch_len);
cogl_buffer_unmap (COGL_BUFFER (state->vertex_array));
}
batch_and_call (batch_start,
batch_len,
compare_entry_n_layers,
_cogl_journal_flush_texcoord_vbo_offsets_and_entries,
data);
/* progress forward through the VBO containing all our vertices */
state->array_offset += (stride * 4 * batch_len);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_JOURNAL))
g_print ("new vbo offset = %lu\n", (unsigned long)state->array_offset);
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
time_flush_vbo_texcoord_pipeline_entries);
}
static gboolean
compare_entry_strides (CoglJournalEntry *entry0, CoglJournalEntry *entry1)
{
/* Currently the only thing that affects the stride for our vertex arrays
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* is the number of pipeline layers. We need to update our VBO offsets
* whenever the stride changes. */
/* TODO: We should be padding the n_layers == 1 case as if it were
* n_layers == 2 so we can reduce the need to split batches. */
if (entry0->n_layers == entry1->n_layers ||
(entry0->n_layers <= MIN_LAYER_PADING &&
entry1->n_layers <= MIN_LAYER_PADING))
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
/* At this point we know the batch has a unique clip stack */
static void
_cogl_journal_flush_clip_stacks_and_entries (CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
int batch_len,
void *data)
{
CoglJournalFlushState *state = data;
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (time_flush_clip_stack_pipeline_entries,
"Journal Flush", /* parent */
"flush: clip+vbo+texcoords+pipeline+entries",
"The time spent flushing clip + vbo + texcoord offsets + "
"pipeline + entries",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context,
time_flush_clip_stack_pipeline_entries);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_BATCHING))
g_print ("BATCHING: clip stack batch len = %d\n", batch_len);
_cogl_clip_stack_flush (batch_start->clip_stack);
_cogl_matrix_stack_push (state->modelview_stack);
/* If we have transformed all our quads at log time then we ensure
* no further model transform is applied by loading the identity
* matrix here. We need to do this after flushing the clip stack
* because the clip stack flushing code can modify the matrix */
if (G_LIKELY (!(cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_TRANSFORM)))
{
_cogl_matrix_stack_load_identity (state->modelview_stack);
_cogl_matrix_stack_flush_to_gl (state->modelview_stack,
COGL_MATRIX_MODELVIEW);
}
/* Setting up the clip state can sometimes also flush the projection
matrix so we should flush it again. This will be a no-op if the
clip code didn't modify the projection */
_cogl_matrix_stack_flush_to_gl (state->projection_stack,
COGL_MATRIX_PROJECTION);
batch_and_call (batch_start,
batch_len,
compare_entry_strides,
_cogl_journal_flush_vbo_offsets_and_entries, /* callback */
data);
_cogl_matrix_stack_pop (state->modelview_stack);
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context,
time_flush_clip_stack_pipeline_entries);
}
static gboolean
calculate_translation (const CoglMatrix *a,
const CoglMatrix *b,
float *tx_p,
float *ty_p)
{
float tx, ty;
int x, y;
/* Assuming we had the original matrix in this form:
*
* [ a, a, a, a ]
* [ a, a, a, a ]
* a = [ a, a, a, a ]
* [ a, a, a, a ]
*
* then a translation of that matrix would be a multiplication by a
* matrix of this form:
*
* [ 1, 0, 0, x ]
* [ 0, 1, 0, y ]
* t = [ 0, 0, 1, 0 ]
* [ 0, 0, 0, 1 ]
*
* That would give us a matrix of this form.
*
* [ a, a, a, a x + a y + a ]
* [ a, a, a, a x + a y + a ]
* b = a t = [ a, a, a, a x + a y + a ]
* [ a, a, a, a x + a y + a ]
*
* We can use the two equations from the top left of the matrix to
* work out the x and y translation given the two matrices:
*
* b = ax + ay + a
* b = ax + ay + a
*
* Rearranging gives us:
*
* a b - a a
* ----------------- + a - b
* a
* x = ---------------------------------
* a a
* ------- - a
* a
*
* b - ax - a
* y = ----------------
* a
*
* Once we've worked out what x and y would be if this was a valid
* translation then we can simply verify that the rest of the matrix
* matches up.
*/
/* The leftmost 3x4 part of the matrix shouldn't change by a
translation so we can just compare it directly */
for (y = 0; y < 4; y++)
for (x = 0; x < 3; x++)
if ((&a->xx)[x * 4 + y] != (&b->xx)[x * 4 + y])
return FALSE;
tx = (((a->xy * b->yw - a->yw * a->xy) / a->yy + a->xw - b->xw) /
((a->xy * a->yx) / a->yy - a->xx));
ty = (b->yw - a->yx * tx - a->yw) / a->yy;
#define APPROX_EQUAL(a, b) (fabsf ((a) - (b)) < 1e-6f)
/* Check whether the 4th column of the matrices match up to the
calculation */
if (!APPROX_EQUAL (b->xw, a->xx * tx + a->xy * ty + a->xw) ||
!APPROX_EQUAL (b->yw, a->yx * tx + a->yy * ty + a->yw) ||
!APPROX_EQUAL (b->zw, a->zx * tx + a->zy * ty + a->zw) ||
!APPROX_EQUAL (b->ww, a->wx * tx + a->wy * ty + a->ww))
return FALSE;
#undef APPROX_EQUAL
*tx_p = tx;
*ty_p = ty;
return TRUE;
}
typedef struct
{
float x_1, y_1;
float x_2, y_2;
} ClipBounds;
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
static gboolean
can_software_clip_entry (CoglJournalEntry *journal_entry,
CoglJournalEntry *prev_journal_entry,
CoglClipStack *clip_stack,
ClipBounds *clip_bounds_out)
{
CoglPipeline *pipeline = journal_entry->pipeline;
CoglClipStack *clip_entry;
int layer_num;
clip_bounds_out->x_1 = -G_MAXFLOAT;
clip_bounds_out->y_1 = -G_MAXFLOAT;
clip_bounds_out->x_2 = G_MAXFLOAT;
clip_bounds_out->y_2 = G_MAXFLOAT;
/* Check the pipeline is usable. We can short-cut here for
entries using the same pipeline as the previous entry */
if (prev_journal_entry == NULL || pipeline != prev_journal_entry->pipeline)
{
/* If the pipeline has a user program then we can't reliably modify
the texture coordinates */
if (cogl_pipeline_get_user_program (pipeline))
return FALSE;
/* If any of the pipeline layers have a texture matrix then we can't
reliably modify the texture coordinates */
for (layer_num = cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline) - 1;
layer_num >= 0;
layer_num--)
if (_cogl_pipeline_layer_has_user_matrix (pipeline, layer_num))
return FALSE;
}
/* Now we need to verify that each clip entry's matrix is just a
translation of the journal entry's modelview matrix. We can
also work out the bounds of the clip in modelview space using
this translation */
for (clip_entry = clip_stack; clip_entry; clip_entry = clip_entry->parent)
{
float rect_x1, rect_y1, rect_x2, rect_y2;
CoglClipStackRect *clip_rect;
float tx, ty;
clip_rect = (CoglClipStackRect *) clip_entry;
if (!calculate_translation (&clip_rect->matrix,
&journal_entry->model_view,
&tx, &ty))
return FALSE;
if (clip_rect->x0 < clip_rect->x1)
{
rect_x1 = clip_rect->x0;
rect_x2 = clip_rect->x1;
}
else
{
rect_x1 = clip_rect->x1;
rect_x2 = clip_rect->x0;
}
if (clip_rect->y0 < clip_rect->y1)
{
rect_y1 = clip_rect->y0;
rect_y2 = clip_rect->y1;
}
else
{
rect_y1 = clip_rect->y1;
rect_y2 = clip_rect->y0;
}
clip_bounds_out->x_1 = MAX (clip_bounds_out->x_1, rect_x1 - tx);
clip_bounds_out->y_1 = MAX (clip_bounds_out->y_1, rect_y1 - ty);
clip_bounds_out->x_2 = MIN (clip_bounds_out->x_2, rect_x2 - tx);
clip_bounds_out->y_2 = MIN (clip_bounds_out->y_2, rect_y2 - ty);
}
return TRUE;
}
static void
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
software_clip_entry (CoglJournalEntry *journal_entry,
float *verts,
ClipBounds *clip_bounds)
{
size_t stride =
GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (journal_entry->n_layers);
float rx1, ry1, rx2, ry2;
float vx1, vy1, vx2, vy2;
int layer_num;
/* Remove the clip on the entry */
_cogl_clip_stack_unref (journal_entry->clip_stack);
journal_entry->clip_stack = NULL;
vx1 = verts[0];
vy1 = verts[1];
vx2 = verts[stride];
vy2 = verts[stride + 1];
if (vx1 < vx2)
{
rx1 = vx1;
rx2 = vx2;
}
else
{
rx1 = vx2;
rx2 = vx1;
}
if (vy1 < vy2)
{
ry1 = vy1;
ry2 = vy2;
}
else
{
ry1 = vy2;
ry2 = vy1;
}
rx1 = CLAMP (rx1, clip_bounds->x_1, clip_bounds->x_2);
ry1 = CLAMP (ry1, clip_bounds->y_1, clip_bounds->y_2);
rx2 = CLAMP (rx2, clip_bounds->x_1, clip_bounds->x_2);
ry2 = CLAMP (ry2, clip_bounds->y_1, clip_bounds->y_2);
/* Check if the rectangle intersects the clip at all */
if (rx1 == rx2 || ry1 == ry2)
/* Will set all of the vertex data to 0 in the hope that this
will create a degenerate rectangle and the GL driver will
be able to clip it quickly */
memset (verts, 0, sizeof (float) * stride * 2);
else
{
if (vx1 > vx2)
{
float t = rx1;
rx1 = rx2;
rx2 = t;
}
if (vy1 > vy2)
{
float t = ry1;
ry1 = ry2;
ry2 = t;
}
verts[0] = rx1;
verts[1] = ry1;
verts[stride] = rx2;
verts[stride + 1] = ry2;
/* Convert the rectangle coordinates to a fraction of the original
rectangle */
rx1 = (rx1 - vx1) / (vx2 - vx1);
ry1 = (ry1 - vy1) / (vy2 - vy1);
rx2 = (rx2 - vx1) / (vx2 - vx1);
ry2 = (ry2 - vy1) / (vy2 - vy1);
for (layer_num = 0; layer_num < journal_entry->n_layers; layer_num++)
{
float *t = verts + 2 + 2 * layer_num;
float tx1 = t[0], ty1 = t[1];
float tx2 = t[stride], ty2 = t[stride + 1];
t[0] = rx1 * (tx2 - tx1) + tx1;
t[1] = ry1 * (ty2 - ty1) + ty1;
t[stride] = rx2 * (tx2 - tx1) + tx1;
t[stride + 1] = ry2 * (ty2 - ty1) + ty1;
}
}
}
static void
maybe_software_clip_entries (CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
int batch_len,
CoglJournalFlushState *state)
{
CoglJournal *journal = state->journal;
CoglClipStack *clip_stack, *clip_entry;
int entry_num;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
/* This tries to find cases where the entry is logged with a clip
but it would be faster to modify the vertex and texture
coordinates rather than flush the clip so that it can batch
better */
/* If the batch is reasonably long then it's worthwhile programming
the GPU to do the clip */
if (batch_len >= COGL_JOURNAL_HARDWARE_CLIP_THRESHOLD)
return;
clip_stack = batch_start->clip_stack;
if (clip_stack == NULL)
return;
/* Verify that all of the clip stack entries are a simple rectangle
clip */
for (clip_entry = clip_stack; clip_entry; clip_entry = clip_entry->parent)
if (clip_entry->type != COGL_CLIP_STACK_RECT)
return;
/* This scratch buffer is used to store the translation for each
entry in the journal. We store it in a separate buffer because
it's expensive to calculate but at this point we still don't know
whether we can clip all of the entries so we don't want to do the
rest of the dependant calculations until we're sure we can. */
if (ctx->journal_clip_bounds == NULL)
ctx->journal_clip_bounds = g_array_new (FALSE, FALSE, sizeof (ClipBounds));
g_array_set_size (ctx->journal_clip_bounds, batch_len);
for (entry_num = 0; entry_num < batch_len; entry_num++)
{
CoglJournalEntry *journal_entry = batch_start + entry_num;
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
CoglJournalEntry *prev_journal_entry =
entry_num ? batch_start + (entry_num - 1) : NULL;
ClipBounds *clip_bounds = &g_array_index (ctx->journal_clip_bounds,
ClipBounds, entry_num);
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
if (!can_software_clip_entry (journal_entry, prev_journal_entry,
clip_stack,
clip_bounds))
return;
}
/* If we make it here then we know we can software clip the entire batch */
for (entry_num = 0; entry_num < batch_len; entry_num++)
{
CoglJournalEntry *journal_entry = batch_start + entry_num;
float *verts = &g_array_index (journal->vertices, float,
journal_entry->array_offset + 1);
ClipBounds *clip_bounds = &g_array_index (ctx->journal_clip_bounds,
ClipBounds, entry_num);
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
software_clip_entry (journal_entry, verts, clip_bounds);
}
return;
}
static void
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
_cogl_journal_maybe_software_clip_entries (CoglJournalEntry *batch_start,
int batch_len,
void *data)
{
CoglJournalFlushState *state = data;
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (time_check_software_clip,
"Journal Flush", /* parent */
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
"flush: software clipping",
"Time spent software clipping",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context,
time_check_software_clip);
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
maybe_software_clip_entries (batch_start, batch_len, state);
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context,
time_check_software_clip);
}
static gboolean
compare_entry_clip_stacks (CoglJournalEntry *entry0, CoglJournalEntry *entry1)
{
return entry0->clip_stack == entry1->clip_stack;
}
static CoglVertexArray *
upload_vertices (const CoglJournalEntry *entries,
int n_entries,
size_t needed_vbo_len,
GArray *vertices)
{
CoglVertexArray *array;
CoglBuffer *buffer;
const float *vin;
float *vout;
int entry_num;
int i;
g_assert (needed_vbo_len);
array = cogl_vertex_array_new (needed_vbo_len * 4, NULL);
buffer = COGL_BUFFER (array);
cogl_buffer_set_update_hint (buffer, COGL_BUFFER_UPDATE_HINT_STATIC);
vout = _cogl_buffer_map_for_fill_or_fallback (buffer);
vin = &g_array_index (vertices, float, 0);
/* Expand the number of vertices from 2 to 4 while uploading */
for (entry_num = 0; entry_num < n_entries; entry_num++)
{
const CoglJournalEntry *entry = entries + entry_num;
size_t vb_stride = GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (entry->n_layers);
size_t array_stride =
GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (entry->n_layers);
/* Copy the color to all four of the vertices */
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
memcpy (vout + vb_stride * i + POS_STRIDE, vin, 4);
vin++;
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_TRANSFORM))
{
vout[vb_stride * 0] = vin[0];
vout[vb_stride * 0 + 1] = vin[1];
vout[vb_stride * 1] = vin[0];
vout[vb_stride * 1 + 1] = vin[array_stride + 1];
vout[vb_stride * 2] = vin[array_stride];
vout[vb_stride * 2 + 1] = vin[array_stride + 1];
vout[vb_stride * 3] = vin[array_stride];
vout[vb_stride * 3 + 1] = vin[1];
}
else
{
float v[8];
v[0] = vin[0];
v[1] = vin[1];
v[2] = vin[0];
v[3] = vin[array_stride + 1];
v[4] = vin[array_stride];
v[5] = vin[array_stride + 1];
v[6] = vin[array_stride];
v[7] = vin[1];
cogl_matrix_transform_points (&entry->model_view,
2, /* n_components */
sizeof (float) * 2, /* stride_in */
v, /* points_in */
/* strideout */
vb_stride * sizeof (float),
vout, /* points_out */
4 /* n_points */);
}
for (i = 0; i < entry->n_layers; i++)
{
const float *tin = vin + 2;
float *tout = vout + POS_STRIDE + COLOR_STRIDE;
tout[vb_stride * 0 + i * 2] = tin[i * 2];
tout[vb_stride * 0 + 1 + i * 2] = tin[i * 2 + 1];
tout[vb_stride * 1 + i * 2] = tin[i * 2];
tout[vb_stride * 1 + 1 + i * 2] = tin[array_stride + i * 2 + 1];
tout[vb_stride * 2 + i * 2] = tin[array_stride + i * 2];
tout[vb_stride * 2 + 1 + i * 2] = tin[array_stride + i * 2 + 1];
tout[vb_stride * 3 + i * 2] = tin[array_stride + i * 2];
tout[vb_stride * 3 + 1 + i * 2] = tin[i * 2 + 1];
}
vin += array_stride * 2;
vout += vb_stride * 4;
}
_cogl_buffer_unmap_for_fill_or_fallback (buffer);
return array;
}
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
void
_cogl_journal_discard (CoglJournal *journal)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < journal->entries->len; i++)
{
CoglJournalEntry *entry =
&g_array_index (journal->entries, CoglJournalEntry, i);
_cogl_pipeline_journal_unref (entry->pipeline);
_cogl_clip_stack_unref (entry->clip_stack);
}
g_array_set_size (journal->entries, 0);
g_array_set_size (journal->vertices, 0);
journal->needed_vbo_len = 0;
journal->fast_read_pixel_count = 0;
}
/* Note: A return value of FALSE doesn't mean 'no' it means
* 'unknown' */
gboolean
_cogl_journal_all_entries_within_bounds (CoglJournal *journal,
float clip_x0,
float clip_y0,
float clip_x1,
float clip_y1)
{
CoglJournalEntry *entry = (CoglJournalEntry *)journal->entries->data;
CoglClipStack *clip_entry;
CoglClipStack *reference = NULL;
int bounds_x0;
int bounds_y0;
int bounds_x1;
int bounds_y1;
int i;
if (journal->entries->len == 0)
return TRUE;
/* Find the shortest clip_stack ancestry that leaves us in the
* required bounds */
for (clip_entry = entry->clip_stack;
clip_entry;
clip_entry = clip_entry->parent)
{
_cogl_clip_stack_get_bounds (clip_entry,
&bounds_x0, &bounds_y0,
&bounds_x1, &bounds_y1);
if (bounds_x0 >= clip_x0 && bounds_y0 >= clip_y0 &&
bounds_x1 <= clip_x1 && bounds_y1 <= clip_y1)
reference = clip_entry;
else
break;
}
if (!reference)
return FALSE;
/* For the remaining journal entries we will only verify they share
* 'reference' as an ancestor in their clip stack since that's
* enough to know that they would be within the required bounds.
*/
for (i = 1; i < journal->entries->len; i++)
{
gboolean found_reference = FALSE;
entry = &g_array_index (journal->entries, CoglJournalEntry, i);
for (clip_entry = entry->clip_stack;
clip_entry;
clip_entry = clip_entry->parent)
{
if (clip_entry == reference)
{
found_reference = TRUE;
break;
}
}
if (!found_reference)
return FALSE;
}
return TRUE;
}
/* XXX NB: When _cogl_journal_flush() returns all state relating
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* to pipelines, all glEnable flags and current matrix state
* is undefined.
*/
void
_cogl_journal_flush (CoglJournal *journal,
CoglFramebuffer *framebuffer)
{
CoglJournalFlushState state;
int i;
[draw-buffers] First pass at overhauling Cogl's framebuffer management Cogl's support for offscreen rendering was originally written just to support the clutter_texture_new_from_actor API and due to lack of documentation and several confusing - non orthogonal - side effects of using the API it wasn't really possible to use directly. This commit does a number of things: - It removes {gl,gles}/cogl-fbo.{c,h} and adds shared cogl-draw-buffer.{c,h} files instead which should be easier to maintain. - internally CoglFbo objects are now called CoglDrawBuffers. A CoglDrawBuffer is an abstract base class that is inherited from to implement CoglOnscreen and CoglOffscreen draw buffers. CoglOffscreen draw buffers will initially be used to support the cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture API, and CoglOnscreen draw buffers will start to be used internally to represent windows as we aim to migrate some of Clutter's backend code to Cogl. - It makes draw buffer objects the owners of the following state: - viewport - projection matrix stack - modelview matrix stack - clip state (This means when you switch between draw buffers you will automatically be switching to their associated viewport, matrix and clip state) Aside from hopefully making cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture be more useful short term by having simpler and well defined semantics for cogl_set_draw_buffer, as mentioned above this is the first step for a couple of other things: - Its a step toward moving ownership for windows down from Clutter backends into Cogl, by (internally at least) introducing the CoglOnscreen draw buffer. Note: the plan is that cogl_set_draw_buffer will accept on or offscreen draw buffer handles, and the "target" argument will become redundant since we will instead query the type of the given draw buffer handle. - Because we have a common type for on and offscreen framebuffers we can provide a unified API for framebuffer management. Things like: - blitting between buffers - managing ancillary buffers (e.g. attaching depth and stencil buffers) - size requisition - clearing
2009-09-25 09:34:34 -04:00
CoglMatrixStack *modelview_stack;
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (flush_timer,
"Mainloop", /* parent */
"Journal Flush",
"The time spent flushing the Cogl journal",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
if (journal->entries->len == 0)
return;
/* The entries in this journal may depend on images in other
* framebuffers which may require that we flush the journals
* associated with those framebuffers before we can flush
* this journal... */
_cogl_framebuffer_flush_dependency_journals (framebuffer);
/* Note: we start the timer after flushing dependency journals so
* that the timer isn't started recursively. */
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context, flush_timer);
cogl_push_framebuffer (framebuffer);
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_BATCHING))
g_print ("BATCHING: journal len = %d\n", journal->entries->len);
/* NB: the journal deals with flushing the modelview stack and clip
state manually */
_cogl_framebuffer_flush_state (framebuffer,
COGL_FRAMEBUFFER_FLUSH_SKIP_MODELVIEW |
COGL_FRAMEBUFFER_FLUSH_SKIP_CLIP_STATE);
state.journal = journal;
state.attributes = ctx->journal_flush_attributes_array;
modelview_stack = _cogl_framebuffer_get_modelview_stack (framebuffer);
[draw-buffers] First pass at overhauling Cogl's framebuffer management Cogl's support for offscreen rendering was originally written just to support the clutter_texture_new_from_actor API and due to lack of documentation and several confusing - non orthogonal - side effects of using the API it wasn't really possible to use directly. This commit does a number of things: - It removes {gl,gles}/cogl-fbo.{c,h} and adds shared cogl-draw-buffer.{c,h} files instead which should be easier to maintain. - internally CoglFbo objects are now called CoglDrawBuffers. A CoglDrawBuffer is an abstract base class that is inherited from to implement CoglOnscreen and CoglOffscreen draw buffers. CoglOffscreen draw buffers will initially be used to support the cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture API, and CoglOnscreen draw buffers will start to be used internally to represent windows as we aim to migrate some of Clutter's backend code to Cogl. - It makes draw buffer objects the owners of the following state: - viewport - projection matrix stack - modelview matrix stack - clip state (This means when you switch between draw buffers you will automatically be switching to their associated viewport, matrix and clip state) Aside from hopefully making cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture be more useful short term by having simpler and well defined semantics for cogl_set_draw_buffer, as mentioned above this is the first step for a couple of other things: - Its a step toward moving ownership for windows down from Clutter backends into Cogl, by (internally at least) introducing the CoglOnscreen draw buffer. Note: the plan is that cogl_set_draw_buffer will accept on or offscreen draw buffer handles, and the "target" argument will become redundant since we will instead query the type of the given draw buffer handle. - Because we have a common type for on and offscreen framebuffers we can provide a unified API for framebuffer management. Things like: - blitting between buffers - managing ancillary buffers (e.g. attaching depth and stencil buffers) - size requisition - clearing
2009-09-25 09:34:34 -04:00
state.modelview_stack = modelview_stack;
state.projection_stack = _cogl_framebuffer_get_projection_stack (framebuffer);
if (G_UNLIKELY ((cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_SOFTWARE_CLIP) == 0))
{
/* We do an initial walk of the journal to analyse the clip stack
batches to see if we can do software clipping. We do this as a
separate walk of the journal because we can modify entries and
this may end up joining together clip stack batches in the next
iteration. */
batch_and_call ((CoglJournalEntry *)journal->entries->data, /* first entry */
journal->entries->len, /* max number of entries to consider */
compare_entry_clip_stacks,
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
_cogl_journal_maybe_software_clip_entries, /* callback */
&state); /* data */
}
/* We upload the vertices after the clip stack pass in case it
modifies the entries */
state.vertex_array = upload_vertices (&g_array_index (journal->entries,
CoglJournalEntry, 0),
journal->entries->len,
journal->needed_vbo_len,
journal->vertices);
state.array_offset = 0;
/* batch_and_call() batches a list of journal entries according to some
* given criteria and calls a callback once for each determined batch.
*
* The process of flushing the journal is staggered to reduce the amount
* of driver/GPU state changes necessary:
* 1) We split the entries according to the clip state.
* 2) We split the entries according to the stride of the vertices:
* Each time the stride of our vertex data changes we need to call
* gl{Vertex,Color}Pointer to inform GL of new VBO offsets.
* Currently the only thing that affects the stride of our vertex data
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* is the number of pipeline layers.
* 3) We split the entries explicitly by the number of pipeline layers:
* We pad our vertex data when the number of layers is < 2 so that we
* can minimize changes in stride. Each time the number of layers
* changes we need to call glTexCoordPointer to inform GL of new VBO
* offsets.
* 4) We then split according to compatible Cogl pipelines:
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* This is where we flush pipeline state
* 5) Finally we split according to modelview matrix changes:
* This is when we finally tell GL to draw something.
* Note: Splitting by modelview changes is skipped when are doing the
* vertex transformation in software at log time.
*/
batch_and_call ((CoglJournalEntry *)journal->entries->data, /* first entry */
journal->entries->len, /* max number of entries to consider */
compare_entry_clip_stacks,
_cogl_journal_flush_clip_stacks_and_entries, /* callback */
&state); /* data */
for (i = 0; i < state.attributes->len; i++)
cogl_object_unref (g_array_index (state.attributes, CoglAttribute *, i));
g_array_set_size (state.attributes, 0);
cogl_object_unref (state.vertex_array);
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
_cogl_journal_discard (journal);
cogl_pop_framebuffer ();
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context, flush_timer);
}
static gboolean
add_framebuffer_deps_cb (CoglPipelineLayer *layer, void *user_data)
[draw-buffers] First pass at overhauling Cogl's framebuffer management Cogl's support for offscreen rendering was originally written just to support the clutter_texture_new_from_actor API and due to lack of documentation and several confusing - non orthogonal - side effects of using the API it wasn't really possible to use directly. This commit does a number of things: - It removes {gl,gles}/cogl-fbo.{c,h} and adds shared cogl-draw-buffer.{c,h} files instead which should be easier to maintain. - internally CoglFbo objects are now called CoglDrawBuffers. A CoglDrawBuffer is an abstract base class that is inherited from to implement CoglOnscreen and CoglOffscreen draw buffers. CoglOffscreen draw buffers will initially be used to support the cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture API, and CoglOnscreen draw buffers will start to be used internally to represent windows as we aim to migrate some of Clutter's backend code to Cogl. - It makes draw buffer objects the owners of the following state: - viewport - projection matrix stack - modelview matrix stack - clip state (This means when you switch between draw buffers you will automatically be switching to their associated viewport, matrix and clip state) Aside from hopefully making cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture be more useful short term by having simpler and well defined semantics for cogl_set_draw_buffer, as mentioned above this is the first step for a couple of other things: - Its a step toward moving ownership for windows down from Clutter backends into Cogl, by (internally at least) introducing the CoglOnscreen draw buffer. Note: the plan is that cogl_set_draw_buffer will accept on or offscreen draw buffer handles, and the "target" argument will become redundant since we will instead query the type of the given draw buffer handle. - Because we have a common type for on and offscreen framebuffers we can provide a unified API for framebuffer management. Things like: - blitting between buffers - managing ancillary buffers (e.g. attaching depth and stencil buffers) - size requisition - clearing
2009-09-25 09:34:34 -04:00
{
CoglFramebuffer *framebuffer = user_data;
CoglHandle texture = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_texture_real (layer);
const GList *l;
if (!texture)
return TRUE;
[draw-buffers] First pass at overhauling Cogl's framebuffer management Cogl's support for offscreen rendering was originally written just to support the clutter_texture_new_from_actor API and due to lack of documentation and several confusing - non orthogonal - side effects of using the API it wasn't really possible to use directly. This commit does a number of things: - It removes {gl,gles}/cogl-fbo.{c,h} and adds shared cogl-draw-buffer.{c,h} files instead which should be easier to maintain. - internally CoglFbo objects are now called CoglDrawBuffers. A CoglDrawBuffer is an abstract base class that is inherited from to implement CoglOnscreen and CoglOffscreen draw buffers. CoglOffscreen draw buffers will initially be used to support the cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture API, and CoglOnscreen draw buffers will start to be used internally to represent windows as we aim to migrate some of Clutter's backend code to Cogl. - It makes draw buffer objects the owners of the following state: - viewport - projection matrix stack - modelview matrix stack - clip state (This means when you switch between draw buffers you will automatically be switching to their associated viewport, matrix and clip state) Aside from hopefully making cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture be more useful short term by having simpler and well defined semantics for cogl_set_draw_buffer, as mentioned above this is the first step for a couple of other things: - Its a step toward moving ownership for windows down from Clutter backends into Cogl, by (internally at least) introducing the CoglOnscreen draw buffer. Note: the plan is that cogl_set_draw_buffer will accept on or offscreen draw buffer handles, and the "target" argument will become redundant since we will instead query the type of the given draw buffer handle. - Because we have a common type for on and offscreen framebuffers we can provide a unified API for framebuffer management. Things like: - blitting between buffers - managing ancillary buffers (e.g. attaching depth and stencil buffers) - size requisition - clearing
2009-09-25 09:34:34 -04:00
for (l = _cogl_texture_get_associated_framebuffers (texture); l; l = l->next)
_cogl_framebuffer_add_dependency (framebuffer, l->data);
return TRUE;
[draw-buffers] First pass at overhauling Cogl's framebuffer management Cogl's support for offscreen rendering was originally written just to support the clutter_texture_new_from_actor API and due to lack of documentation and several confusing - non orthogonal - side effects of using the API it wasn't really possible to use directly. This commit does a number of things: - It removes {gl,gles}/cogl-fbo.{c,h} and adds shared cogl-draw-buffer.{c,h} files instead which should be easier to maintain. - internally CoglFbo objects are now called CoglDrawBuffers. A CoglDrawBuffer is an abstract base class that is inherited from to implement CoglOnscreen and CoglOffscreen draw buffers. CoglOffscreen draw buffers will initially be used to support the cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture API, and CoglOnscreen draw buffers will start to be used internally to represent windows as we aim to migrate some of Clutter's backend code to Cogl. - It makes draw buffer objects the owners of the following state: - viewport - projection matrix stack - modelview matrix stack - clip state (This means when you switch between draw buffers you will automatically be switching to their associated viewport, matrix and clip state) Aside from hopefully making cogl_offscreen_new_to_texture be more useful short term by having simpler and well defined semantics for cogl_set_draw_buffer, as mentioned above this is the first step for a couple of other things: - Its a step toward moving ownership for windows down from Clutter backends into Cogl, by (internally at least) introducing the CoglOnscreen draw buffer. Note: the plan is that cogl_set_draw_buffer will accept on or offscreen draw buffer handles, and the "target" argument will become redundant since we will instead query the type of the given draw buffer handle. - Because we have a common type for on and offscreen framebuffers we can provide a unified API for framebuffer management. Things like: - blitting between buffers - managing ancillary buffers (e.g. attaching depth and stencil buffers) - size requisition - clearing
2009-09-25 09:34:34 -04:00
}
void
_cogl_journal_log_quad (CoglJournal *journal,
const float *position,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline,
int n_layers,
CoglHandle layer0_override_texture,
const float *tex_coords,
unsigned int tex_coords_len)
{
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
gsize stride;
int next_vert;
float *v;
int i;
int next_entry;
guint32 disable_layers;
CoglJournalEntry *entry;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *source;
CoglClipStack *clip_stack;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipelineFlushOptions flush_options;
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (log_timer,
"Mainloop", /* parent */
"Journal Log",
"The time spent logging in the Cogl journal",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context, log_timer);
/* The vertex data is logged into a separate array. The data needs
to be copied into a vertex array before it's given to GL so we
only store two vertices per quad and expand it to four while
uploading. */
/* XXX: See definition of GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS for details
* about how we pack our vertex data */
stride = GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (n_layers);
next_vert = journal->vertices->len;
g_array_set_size (journal->vertices, next_vert + 2 * stride + 1);
v = &g_array_index (journal->vertices, float, next_vert);
/* We calculate the needed size of the vbo as we go because it
depends on the number of layers in each entry and it's not easy
calculate based on the length of the logged vertices array */
journal->needed_vbo_len += GET_JOURNAL_VB_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (n_layers) * 4;
/* XXX: All the jumping around to fill in this strided buffer doesn't
* seem ideal. */
/* FIXME: This is a hacky optimization, since it will break if we
* change the definition of CoglColor: */
_cogl_pipeline_get_colorubv (pipeline, (guint8 *) v);
v++;
memcpy (v, position, sizeof (float) * 2);
memcpy (v + stride, position + 2, sizeof (float) * 2);
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++)
{
/* XXX: See definition of GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS
* for details about how we pack our vertex data */
GLfloat *t = v + 2 + i * 2;
memcpy (t, tex_coords + i * 4, sizeof (float) * 2);
memcpy (t + stride, tex_coords + i * 4 + 2, sizeof (float) * 2);
}
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_JOURNAL))
{
g_print ("Logged new quad:\n");
v = &g_array_index (journal->vertices, float, next_vert);
_cogl_journal_dump_logged_quad ((guint8 *)v, n_layers);
}
next_entry = journal->entries->len;
g_array_set_size (journal->entries, next_entry + 1);
entry = &g_array_index (journal->entries, CoglJournalEntry, next_entry);
entry->n_layers = n_layers;
entry->array_offset = next_vert;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
source = pipeline;
if (G_UNLIKELY (ctx->legacy_state_set))
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
source = cogl_pipeline_copy (pipeline);
_cogl_pipeline_apply_legacy_state (source);
}
flush_options.flags = 0;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline) != n_layers))
{
disable_layers = (1 << n_layers) - 1;
disable_layers = ~disable_layers;
flush_options.disable_layers = disable_layers;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
flush_options.flags |= COGL_PIPELINE_FLUSH_DISABLE_MASK;
}
if (G_UNLIKELY (layer0_override_texture))
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
flush_options.flags |= COGL_PIPELINE_FLUSH_LAYER0_OVERRIDE;
flush_options.layer0_override_texture = layer0_override_texture;
}
if (G_UNLIKELY (flush_options.flags))
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
/* If we haven't already created a derived pipeline... */
if (source == pipeline)
source = cogl_pipeline_copy (pipeline);
_cogl_pipeline_apply_overrides (source, &flush_options);
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
entry->pipeline = _cogl_pipeline_journal_ref (source);
clip_stack = _cogl_framebuffer_get_clip_stack (_cogl_get_framebuffer ());
entry->clip_stack = _cogl_clip_stack_ref (clip_stack);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
if (G_UNLIKELY (source != pipeline))
cogl_handle_unref (source);
cogl_get_modelview_matrix (&entry->model_view);
_cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer_internal (pipeline,
add_framebuffer_deps_cb,
_cogl_get_framebuffer ());
/* XXX: It doesn't feel very nice that in this case we just assume
* that the journal is associated with the current framebuffer. I
* think a journal->framebuffer reference would seem nicer here but
* the reason we don't have that currently is that it would
* introduce a circular reference. */
if (G_UNLIKELY (cogl_debug_flags & COGL_DEBUG_DISABLE_BATCHING))
_cogl_framebuffer_flush_journal (_cogl_get_framebuffer ());
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context, log_timer);
}
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
static void
entry_to_screen_polygon (const CoglJournalEntry *entry,
float *vertices,
float *poly)
{
size_t array_stride =
GET_JOURNAL_ARRAY_STRIDE_FOR_N_LAYERS (entry->n_layers);
CoglMatrixStack *projection_stack;
CoglMatrix projection;
int i;
int viewport[4];
poly[0] = vertices[0];
poly[1] = vertices[1];
poly[2] = 0;
poly[3] = 1;
poly[4] = vertices[0];
poly[5] = vertices[array_stride + 1];
poly[6] = 0;
poly[7] = 1;
poly[8] = vertices[array_stride];
poly[9] = vertices[array_stride + 1];
poly[10] = 0;
poly[11] = 1;
poly[12] = vertices[array_stride];
poly[13] = vertices[1];
poly[14] = 0;
poly[15] = 1;
/* TODO: perhaps split the following out into a more generalized
* _cogl_transform_points utility...
*/
cogl_matrix_transform_points (&entry->model_view,
2, /* n_components */
sizeof (float) * 4, /* stride_in */
poly, /* points_in */
/* strideout */
sizeof (float) * 4,
poly, /* points_out */
4 /* n_points */);
projection_stack =
_cogl_framebuffer_get_projection_stack (_cogl_get_framebuffer ());
_cogl_matrix_stack_get (projection_stack, &projection);
cogl_matrix_project_points (&projection,
3, /* n_components */
sizeof (float) * 4, /* stride_in */
poly, /* points_in */
/* strideout */
sizeof (float) * 4,
poly, /* points_out */
4 /* n_points */);
_cogl_framebuffer_get_viewport4fv (_cogl_get_framebuffer (),
viewport);
/* Scale from OpenGL normalized device coordinates (ranging from -1 to 1)
* to Cogl window/framebuffer coordinates (ranging from 0 to buffer-size) with
* (0,0) being top left. */
#define VIEWPORT_TRANSFORM_X(x, vp_origin_x, vp_width) \
( ( ((x) + 1.0) * ((vp_width) / 2.0) ) + (vp_origin_x) )
/* Note: for Y we first flip all coordinates around the X axis while in
* normalized device coodinates */
#define VIEWPORT_TRANSFORM_Y(y, vp_origin_y, vp_height) \
( ( ((-(y)) + 1.0) * ((vp_height) / 2.0) ) + (vp_origin_y) )
/* Scale from normalized device coordinates (in range [-1,1]) to
* window coordinates ranging [0,window-size] ... */
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
float w = poly[4 * i + 3];
/* Perform perspective division */
poly[4 * i] /= w;
poly[4 * i + 1] /= w;
/* Apply viewport transform */
poly[4 * i] = VIEWPORT_TRANSFORM_X (poly[4 * i],
viewport[0], viewport[2]);
poly[4 * i + 1] = VIEWPORT_TRANSFORM_Y (poly[4 * i + 1],
viewport[1], viewport[3]);
}
#undef VIEWPORT_TRANSFORM_X
#undef VIEWPORT_TRANSFORM_Y
}
static gboolean
try_checking_point_hits_entry_after_clipping (CoglJournalEntry *entry,
float *vertices,
float x,
float y,
gboolean *hit)
{
gboolean can_software_clip = TRUE;
gboolean needs_software_clip = FALSE;
CoglClipStack *clip_entry;
*hit = TRUE;
/* Verify that all of the clip stack entries are simple rectangle
* clips */
for (clip_entry = entry->clip_stack;
clip_entry;
clip_entry = clip_entry->parent)
{
if (x < clip_entry->bounds_x0 ||
x >= clip_entry->bounds_x1 ||
y < clip_entry->bounds_y0 ||
y >= clip_entry->bounds_y1)
{
*hit = FALSE;
return TRUE;
}
if (clip_entry->type == COGL_CLIP_STACK_WINDOW_RECT)
{
/* XXX: technically we could still run the software clip in
* this case because for our purposes we know this clip
* can be ignored now, but [can_]sofware_clip_entry() doesn't
* know this and will bail out. */
can_software_clip = FALSE;
}
else if (clip_entry->type == COGL_CLIP_STACK_RECT)
{
CoglClipStackRect *rect_entry = (CoglClipStackRect *)entry;
if (rect_entry->can_be_scissor == FALSE)
needs_software_clip = TRUE;
/* If can_be_scissor is TRUE then we know it's screen
* aligned and the hit test we did above has determined
* that we are inside this clip. */
}
else
return FALSE;
}
if (needs_software_clip)
{
ClipBounds clip_bounds;
float poly[16];
if (!can_software_clip)
return FALSE;
cogl: Implements a software only read-pixel fast-path This adds a transparent optimization to cogl_read_pixels for when a single pixel is being read back and it happens that all the geometry of the current frame is still available in the framebuffer's associated journal. The intention is to indirectly optimize Clutter's render based picking mechanism in such a way that the 99% of cases where scenes are comprised of trivial quad primitives that can easily be intersected we can avoid the latency of kicking a GPU render and blocking for the result when we know we can calculate the result manually on the CPU probably faster than we could even kick a render. A nice property of this solution is that it maintains all the flexibility of the render based picking provided by Clutter and it can gracefully fall back to GPU rendering if actors are drawn using anything more complex than a quad for their geometry. It seems worth noting that there is a limitation to the extensibility of this approach in that it can only optimize picking a against geometry that passes through Cogl's journal which isn't something Clutter directly controls. For now though this really doesn't matter since basically all apps should end up hitting this fast-path. The current idea to address this longer term would be a pick2 vfunc for ClutterActor that can support geometry and render based input regions of actors and move this optimization up into Clutter instead. Note: currently we don't have a primitive count threshold to consider that there could be scenes with enough geometry for us to compensate for the cost of kicking a render and determine a result more efficiently by utilizing the GPU. We don't currently expect this to be common though. Note: in the future it could still be interesting to revive something like the wip/async-pbo-picking branch to provide an asynchronous read-pixels based optimization for Clutter picking in cases where more complex input regions that necessitate rendering are in use or if we do add a threshold for rendering as mentioned above.
2011-01-12 17:12:41 -05:00
if (!can_software_clip_entry (entry, NULL,
entry->clip_stack, &clip_bounds))
return FALSE;
software_clip_entry (entry, vertices, &clip_bounds);
entry_to_screen_polygon (entry, vertices, poly);
*hit = _cogl_util_point_in_poly (x, y, poly, sizeof (float) * 4, 4);
return TRUE;
}
return TRUE;
}
gboolean
_cogl_journal_try_read_pixel (CoglJournal *journal,
int x,
int y,
CoglPixelFormat format,
guint8 *pixel,
gboolean *found_intersection)
{
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, FALSE);
/* XXX: this number has been plucked out of thin air, but the idea
* is that if so many pixels are being read from the same un-changed
* journal than we expect that it will be more efficient to fail
* here so we end up flushing and rendering the journal so that
* further reads can directly read from the framebuffer. There will
* be a bit more lag to flush the render but if there are going to
* continue being lots of arbitrary single pixel reads they will end
* up faster in the end. */
if (journal->fast_read_pixel_count > 50)
return FALSE;
if (format != COGL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RGBA_8888_PRE &&
format != COGL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RGBA_8888)
return FALSE;
*found_intersection = FALSE;
/* NB: The most recently added journal entry is the last entry, and
* assuming this is a simple scene only comprised of opaque coloured
* rectangles with no special pipelines involved (e.g. enabling
* depth testing) then we can assume painter's algorithm for the
* entries and so our fast read-pixel just needs to walk backwards
* through the journal entries trying to intersect each entry with
* the given point of interest. */
for (i = journal->entries->len - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
CoglJournalEntry *entry =
&g_array_index (journal->entries, CoglJournalEntry, i);
guint8 *color = (guint8 *)&g_array_index (journal->vertices, float,
entry->array_offset);
float *vertices = (float *)color + 1;
float poly[16];
entry_to_screen_polygon (entry, vertices, poly);
if (!_cogl_util_point_in_poly (x, y, poly, sizeof (float) * 4, 4))
continue;
/* FIXME: the journal should have a back pointer to the
* associated framebuffer, because it should be possible to read
* a pixel from arbitrary framebuffers without needing to
* internally call _cogl_push/pop_framebuffer.
*/
if (entry->clip_stack)
{
gboolean hit;
if (!try_checking_point_hits_entry_after_clipping (entry, vertices,
x, y, &hit))
return FALSE; /* hit couldn't be determined */
if (!hit)
continue;
}
*found_intersection = TRUE;
/* If we find that the rectangle the point of interest
* intersects has any state more complex than a constant opaque
* color then we bail out. */
if (!_cogl_pipeline_equal (ctx->opaque_color_pipeline, entry->pipeline,
(COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_ALL &
~COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_COLOR),
COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_ALL,
0))
return FALSE;
/* we currently only care about cases where the premultiplied or
* unpremultipled colors are equivalent... */
if (color[3] != 0xff)
return FALSE;
pixel[0] = color[0];
pixel[1] = color[1];
pixel[2] = color[2];
pixel[3] = color[3];
goto success;
}
success:
journal->fast_read_pixel_count++;
return TRUE;
}