mutter/cogl/cogl-primitives.c

1039 lines
36 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Cogl
*
* An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
*
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-10 01:57:32 +00:00
* Copyright (C) 2007,2008,2009,2010 Intel Corporation.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*
*/
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include "config.h"
#endif
#include "cogl.h"
#include "cogl-debug.h"
#include "cogl-internal.h"
#include "cogl-context.h"
#include "cogl-journal-private.h"
#include "cogl-texture-private.h"
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
#include "cogl-pipeline-private.h"
#include "cogl-pipeline-opengl-private.h"
#include "cogl-vertex-buffer-private.h"
#include "cogl-framebuffer-private.h"
#include "cogl-vertex-attribute-private.h"
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
#define _COGL_MAX_BEZ_RECURSE_DEPTH 16
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GL
#define glClientActiveTexture ctx->drv.pf_glClientActiveTexture
#endif
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
typedef struct _TextureSlicedQuadState
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
float tex_virtual_origin_x;
float tex_virtual_origin_y;
float quad_origin_x;
float quad_origin_y;
float v_to_q_scale_x;
float v_to_q_scale_y;
float quad_len_x;
float quad_len_y;
gboolean flipped_x;
gboolean flipped_y;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineWrapModeOverrides *wrap_mode_overrides;
} TextureSlicedQuadState;
typedef struct _TextureSlicedPolygonState
{
const CoglTextureVertex *vertices;
int n_vertices;
int stride;
CoglVertexAttribute **attributes;
} TextureSlicedPolygonState;
static void
log_quad_sub_textures_cb (CoglHandle texture_handle,
GLuint gl_handle,
GLenum gl_target,
const float *subtexture_coords,
const float *virtual_coords,
void *user_data)
{
TextureSlicedQuadState *state = user_data;
float quad_coords[4];
#define TEX_VIRTUAL_TO_QUAD(V, Q, AXIS) \
do { \
Q = V - state->tex_virtual_origin_##AXIS; \
Q *= state->v_to_q_scale_##AXIS; \
if (state->flipped_##AXIS) \
Q = state->quad_len_##AXIS - Q; \
Q += state->quad_origin_##AXIS; \
} while (0);
TEX_VIRTUAL_TO_QUAD (virtual_coords[0], quad_coords[0], x);
TEX_VIRTUAL_TO_QUAD (virtual_coords[1], quad_coords[1], y);
TEX_VIRTUAL_TO_QUAD (virtual_coords[2], quad_coords[2], x);
TEX_VIRTUAL_TO_QUAD (virtual_coords[3], quad_coords[3], y);
#undef TEX_VIRTUAL_TO_QUAD
COGL_NOTE (DRAW,
"~~~~~ slice\n"
"qx1: %f\t"
"qy1: %f\n"
"qx2: %f\t"
"qy2: %f\n"
"tx1: %f\t"
"ty1: %f\n"
"tx2: %f\t"
"ty2: %f\n",
quad_coords[0], quad_coords[1],
quad_coords[2], quad_coords[3],
subtexture_coords[0], subtexture_coords[1],
subtexture_coords[2], subtexture_coords[3]);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
/* FIXME: when the wrap mode becomes part of the pipeline we need to
* be able to override the wrap mode when logging a quad. */
_cogl_journal_log_quad (quad_coords,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
state->pipeline,
1, /* one layer */
0, /* don't need to use fallbacks */
gl_handle, /* replace the layer0 texture */
state->wrap_mode_overrides, /* use GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE */
subtexture_coords,
4);
}
/* This path doesn't currently support multitexturing but is used for
* CoglTextures that don't support repeating using the GPU so we need to
* manually emit extra geometry to fake the repeating. This includes:
*
* - CoglTexture2DSliced: when made of > 1 slice or if the users given
* texture coordinates require repeating,
* - CoglTexture2DAtlas: if the users given texture coordinates require
* repeating,
* - CoglTextureRectangle: if the users given texture coordinates require
* repeating,
* - CoglTexturePixmap: if the users given texture coordinates require
* repeating
*/
/* TODO: support multitexturing */
static void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_texture_quad_multiple_primitives (CoglHandle tex_handle,
CoglPipeline *pipeline,
gboolean clamp_s,
gboolean clamp_t,
const float *position,
float tx_1,
float ty_1,
float tx_2,
float ty_2)
{
TextureSlicedQuadState state;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineWrapModeOverrides wrap_mode_overrides;
gboolean tex_virtual_flipped_x;
gboolean tex_virtual_flipped_y;
gboolean quad_flipped_x;
gboolean quad_flipped_y;
CoglHandle first_layer;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
/* If the wrap mode is clamp to edge then we'll recursively draw the
stretched part and replace the coordinates */
if (clamp_s && tx_1 != tx_2)
{
float *replacement_position = g_newa (float, 4);
float old_tx_1 = tx_1, old_tx_2 = tx_2;
memcpy (replacement_position, position, sizeof (float) * 4);
tx_1 = CLAMP (tx_1, 0.0f, 1.0f);
tx_2 = CLAMP (tx_2, 0.0f, 1.0f);
if (old_tx_1 != tx_1)
{
/* Draw the left part of the quad as a stretched copy of tx_1 */
float tmp_position[] =
{ position[0], position[1],
(position[0] +
(position[2] - position[0]) *
(tx_1 - old_tx_1) / (old_tx_2 - old_tx_1)),
position[3] };
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_texture_quad_multiple_primitives (tex_handle, pipeline,
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
FALSE, clamp_t,
tmp_position,
tx_1, ty_1, tx_1, ty_2);
replacement_position[0] = tmp_position[2];
}
if (old_tx_2 != tx_2)
{
/* Draw the right part of the quad as a stretched copy of tx_2 */
float tmp_position[] =
{ (position[0] +
(position[2] - position[0]) *
(tx_2 - old_tx_1) / (old_tx_2 - old_tx_1)),
position[1], position[2], position[3] };
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_texture_quad_multiple_primitives (tex_handle, pipeline,
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
FALSE, clamp_t,
tmp_position,
tx_2, ty_1, tx_2, ty_2);
replacement_position[2] = tmp_position[0];
}
/* If there's no main part left then we don't need to continue */
if (tx_1 == tx_2)
return;
position = replacement_position;
}
if (clamp_t && ty_1 != ty_2)
{
float *replacement_position = g_newa (float, 4);
float old_ty_1 = ty_1, old_ty_2 = ty_2;
memcpy (replacement_position, position, sizeof (float) * 4);
ty_1 = CLAMP (ty_1, 0.0f, 1.0f);
ty_2 = CLAMP (ty_2, 0.0f, 1.0f);
if (old_ty_1 != ty_1)
{
/* Draw the top part of the quad as a stretched copy of ty_1 */
float tmp_position[] =
{ position[0], position[1], position[2],
(position[1] +
(position[3] - position[1]) *
(ty_1 - old_ty_1) / (old_ty_2 - old_ty_1)) };
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_texture_quad_multiple_primitives (tex_handle, pipeline,
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
clamp_s, FALSE,
tmp_position,
tx_1, ty_1, tx_2, ty_1);
replacement_position[1] = tmp_position[3];
}
if (old_ty_2 != ty_2)
{
/* Draw the bottom part of the quad as a stretched copy of ty_2 */
float tmp_position[] =
{ position[0],
(position[1] +
(position[3] - position[1]) *
(ty_2 - old_ty_1) / (old_ty_2 - old_ty_1)),
position[2], position[3] };
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_texture_quad_multiple_primitives (tex_handle, pipeline,
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
clamp_s, FALSE,
tmp_position,
tx_1, ty_2, tx_2, ty_2);
replacement_position[3] = tmp_position[1];
}
/* If there's no main part left then we don't need to continue */
if (ty_1 == ty_2)
return;
position = replacement_position;
}
state.wrap_mode_overrides = NULL;
memset (&wrap_mode_overrides, 0, sizeof (wrap_mode_overrides));
/* We can't use hardware repeat so we need to set clamp to edge
otherwise it might pull in edge pixels from the other side. By
default WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC becomes CLAMP_TO_EDGE so we only need
to override if the wrap mode is repeat */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
first_layer = _cogl_pipeline_get_layers (pipeline)->data;
if (_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_mode_s (first_layer) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_REPEAT)
{
state.wrap_mode_overrides = &wrap_mode_overrides;
wrap_mode_overrides.values[0].s =
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_OVERRIDE_CLAMP_TO_EDGE;
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_mode_t (first_layer) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_REPEAT)
{
state.wrap_mode_overrides = &wrap_mode_overrides;
wrap_mode_overrides.values[0].t =
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_OVERRIDE_CLAMP_TO_EDGE;
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
state.pipeline = pipeline;
/* Get together the data we need to transform the virtual texture
* coordinates of each slice into quad coordinates...
*
* NB: We need to consider that the quad coordinates and the texture
* coordinates may be inverted along the x or y axis, and must preserve the
* inversions when we emit the final geometry.
*/
#define X0 0
#define Y0 1
#define X1 2
#define Y1 3
tex_virtual_flipped_x = (tx_1 > tx_2) ? TRUE : FALSE;
tex_virtual_flipped_y = (ty_1 > ty_2) ? TRUE : FALSE;
state.tex_virtual_origin_x = tex_virtual_flipped_x ? tx_2 : tx_1;
state.tex_virtual_origin_y = tex_virtual_flipped_y ? ty_2 : ty_1;
quad_flipped_x = (position[X0] > position[X1]) ? TRUE : FALSE;
quad_flipped_y = (position[Y0] > position[Y1]) ? TRUE : FALSE;
state.quad_origin_x = quad_flipped_x ? position[X1] : position[X0];
state.quad_origin_y = quad_flipped_y ? position[Y1] : position[Y0];
/* flatten the two forms of coordinate inversion into one... */
state.flipped_x = tex_virtual_flipped_x ^ quad_flipped_x;
state.flipped_y = tex_virtual_flipped_y ^ quad_flipped_y;
/* We use the _len_AXIS naming here instead of _width and _height because
* log_quad_slice_cb uses a macro with symbol concatenation to handle both
* axis, so this is more convenient... */
state.quad_len_x = fabs (position[X1] - position[X0]);
state.quad_len_y = fabs (position[Y1] - position[Y0]);
#undef X0
#undef Y0
#undef X1
#undef Y1
state.v_to_q_scale_x = fabs (state.quad_len_x / (tx_2 - tx_1));
state.v_to_q_scale_y = fabs (state.quad_len_y / (ty_2 - ty_1));
_cogl_texture_foreach_sub_texture_in_region (tex_handle,
tx_1, ty_1, tx_2, ty_2,
log_quad_sub_textures_cb,
&state);
}
/* This path supports multitexturing but only when each of the layers is
* handled with a single GL texture. Also if repeating is necessary then
* _cogl_texture_can_hardware_repeat() must return TRUE.
* This includes layers made from:
*
* - CoglTexture2DSliced: if only comprised of a single slice with optional
* waste, assuming the users given texture coordinates don't require
* repeating.
* - CoglTexture{1D,2D,3D}: always.
* - CoglTexture2DAtlas: assuming the users given texture coordinates don't
* require repeating.
* - CoglTextureRectangle: assuming the users given texture coordinates don't
* require repeating.
* - CoglTexturePixmap: assuming the users given texture coordinates don't
* require repeating.
*/
static gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_multitexture_quad_single_primitive (const float *position,
CoglPipeline *pipeline,
guint32 fallback_layers,
const float *user_tex_coords,
int user_tex_coords_len)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
int n_layers = cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline);
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
float *final_tex_coords = alloca (sizeof (float) * 4 * n_layers);
const GList *layers;
GList *tmp;
int i;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineWrapModeOverrides wrap_mode_overrides;
/* This will be set to point to wrap_mode_overrides when an override
is needed */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineWrapModeOverrides *wrap_mode_overrides_p = NULL;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, FALSE);
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
memset (&wrap_mode_overrides, 0, sizeof (wrap_mode_overrides));
/*
* Validate the texture coordinates for this rectangle.
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
layers = _cogl_pipeline_get_layers (pipeline);
for (tmp = (GList *)layers, i = 0; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->next, i++)
{
CoglHandle layer = (CoglHandle)tmp->data;
CoglHandle tex_handle;
const float *in_tex_coords;
float *out_tex_coords;
float default_tex_coords[4] = {0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 1.0};
CoglTransformResult transform_result;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
tex_handle = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_texture (layer);
/* COGL_INVALID_HANDLE textures are handled by
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_flush_gl_state */
if (tex_handle == COGL_INVALID_HANDLE)
continue;
/* If the user didn't supply texture coordinates for this layer
then use the default coords */
if (i >= user_tex_coords_len / 4)
in_tex_coords = default_tex_coords;
else
in_tex_coords = &user_tex_coords[i * 4];
out_tex_coords = &final_tex_coords[i * 4];
memcpy (out_tex_coords, in_tex_coords, sizeof (GLfloat) * 4);
/* Convert the texture coordinates to GL.
*/
transform_result =
_cogl_texture_transform_quad_coords_to_gl (tex_handle,
out_tex_coords);
/* If the texture has waste or we are using GL_TEXTURE_RECT we
* can't handle texture repeating so we can't use the layer if
* repeating is required.
*
* NB: We already know that no texture matrix is being used if the
* texture doesn't support hardware repeat.
*/
if (transform_result == COGL_TRANSFORM_SOFTWARE_REPEAT)
{
if (i == 0)
{
if (n_layers > 1)
{
static gboolean warning_seen = FALSE;
if (!warning_seen)
g_warning ("Skipping layers 1..n of your material since "
"the first layer doesn't support hardware "
"repeat (e.g. because of waste or use of "
"GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB) and you supplied "
"texture coordinates outside the range [0,1]."
"Falling back to software repeat assuming "
"layer 0 is the most important one keep");
warning_seen = TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
else
{
static gboolean warning_seen = FALSE;
if (!warning_seen)
g_warning ("Skipping layer %d of your material "
"since you have supplied texture coords "
"outside the range [0,1] but the texture "
"doesn't support hardware repeat (e.g. "
"because of waste or use of "
"GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB). This isn't "
"supported with multi-texturing.", i);
warning_seen = TRUE;
/* NB: marking for fallback will replace the layer with
* a default transparent texture */
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
fallback_layers |= (1 << i);
}
}
/* By default WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC becomes to CLAMP_TO_EDGE. If
the texture coordinates need repeating then we'll override
this to GL_REPEAT. Otherwise we'll leave it at CLAMP_TO_EDGE
so that it won't blend in pixels from the opposite side when
the full texture is drawn with GL_LINEAR filter mode */
if (transform_result == COGL_TRANSFORM_HARDWARE_REPEAT)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_mode_s (layer) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC)
{
wrap_mode_overrides.values[i].s
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
= COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_OVERRIDE_REPEAT;
wrap_mode_overrides_p = &wrap_mode_overrides;
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_mode_t (layer) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC)
{
wrap_mode_overrides.values[i].t
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
= COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_OVERRIDE_REPEAT;
wrap_mode_overrides_p = &wrap_mode_overrides;
}
}
}
_cogl_journal_log_quad (position,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipeline,
n_layers,
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
fallback_layers,
0, /* don't replace the layer0 texture */
wrap_mode_overrides_p,
final_tex_coords,
n_layers * 4);
return TRUE;
}
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect
{
const float *position; /* x0,y0,x1,y1 */
const float *tex_coords; /* (tx0,ty0,tx1,ty1)(tx0,ty0,tx1,ty1)(... */
int tex_coords_len; /* number of floats in tex_coords? */
};
static void
_cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords (
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect *rects,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-10 01:57:32 +00:00
int n_rects)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
const GList *layers;
int n_layers;
const GList *tmp;
guint32 fallback_layers = 0;
gboolean all_use_sliced_quad_fallback = FALSE;
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipeline = cogl_get_source ();
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
layers = _cogl_pipeline_get_layers (pipeline);
n_layers = cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline);
/*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* Validate all the layers of the current source pipeline...
*/
for (tmp = layers, i = 0; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->next, i++)
{
CoglHandle layer = tmp->data;
CoglHandle tex_handle;
/* We need to ensure the mipmaps are ready before deciding
* anything else about the texture because the texture storage
* could completely change if it needs to be migrated out of the
* atlas and will affect how we validate the layer.
*
* FIXME: this needs to be generalized. There could be any
* number of things that might require a shuffling of the
* underlying texture storage. We could add two mechanisms to
* generalize this a bit...
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* 1) add a _cogl_pipeline_layer_update_storage() function that
* would for instance consider if mipmapping is necessary and
* potentially migrate the texture from an atlas.
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* 2) allow setting of transient primitive-flags on a pipeline
* that may affect the outcome of _update_storage(). One flag
* could indicate that we expect to sample beyond the bounds of
* the texture border.
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* flags = COGL_PIPELINE_PRIMITIVE_FLAG_VALID_BORDERS;
* _cogl_pipeline_layer_assert_primitive_flags (layer, flags)
* _cogl_pipeline_layer_update_storage (layer)
* enqueue primitive in journal
*
* when the primitive is dequeued and drawn we should:
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_flush_gl_state (pipeline)
* draw primitive
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_unassert_primitive_flags (layer, flags);
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_layer_update_storage should take into
* consideration all the asserted primitive requirements. (E.g.
* there could be multiple primitives in the journal - or in a
* renderlist in the future - that need mipmaps or that need
* valid contents beyond their borders (for cogl_polygon)
* meaning they can't work with textures in an atas, so
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_layer_update_storage would pass on these
* requirements to the texture atlas backend which would make
* sure the referenced texture is migrated out of the atlas and
* mipmaps are generated.)
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_pre_paint (layer);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
tex_handle = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_texture (layer);
/* COGL_INVALID_HANDLE textures are handled by
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_flush_gl_state */
if (tex_handle == COGL_INVALID_HANDLE)
continue;
/* XXX:
* For now, if the first layer is sliced then all other layers are
* ignored since we currently don't support multi-texturing with
* sliced textures. If the first layer is not sliced then any other
* layers found to be sliced will be skipped. (with a warning)
*
* TODO: Add support for multi-texturing rectangles with sliced
* textures if no texture matrices are in use.
*/
if (cogl_texture_is_sliced (tex_handle))
{
if (i == 0)
{
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
fallback_layers = ~1; /* fallback all except the first layer */
all_use_sliced_quad_fallback = TRUE;
if (tmp->next)
{
static gboolean warning_seen = FALSE;
if (!warning_seen)
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
g_warning ("Skipping layers 1..n of your pipeline since "
"the first layer is sliced. We don't currently "
"support any multi-texturing with sliced "
"textures but assume layer 0 is the most "
"important to keep");
warning_seen = TRUE;
}
break;
}
else
{
static gboolean warning_seen = FALSE;
if (!warning_seen)
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
g_warning ("Skipping layer %d of your pipeline consisting of "
"a sliced texture (unsuported for multi texturing)",
i);
warning_seen = TRUE;
/* NB: marking for fallback will replace the layer with
* a default transparent texture */
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
fallback_layers |= (1 << i);
continue;
}
}
/* If the texture can't be repeated with the GPU (e.g. because it has
* waste or if using GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB) then we don't support
* multi texturing since we don't know if the result will end up trying
* to texture from the waste area. */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (_cogl_pipeline_layer_has_user_matrix (layer)
&& !_cogl_texture_can_hardware_repeat (tex_handle))
{
static gboolean warning_seen = FALSE;
if (!warning_seen)
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
g_warning ("Skipping layer %d of your pipeline since a custom "
"texture matrix was given for a texture that can't be "
"repeated using the GPU and the result may try to "
"sample beyond the bounds of the texture ",
i);
warning_seen = TRUE;
/* NB: marking for fallback will replace the layer with
* a default transparent texture */
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
fallback_layers |= (1 << i);
continue;
}
}
/*
* Emit geometry for each of the rectangles...
*/
for (i = 0; i < n_rects; i++)
{
CoglHandle first_layer, tex_handle;
const float default_tex_coords[4] = {0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 1.0};
const float *tex_coords;
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
gboolean clamp_s, clamp_t;
if (!all_use_sliced_quad_fallback)
{
gboolean success =
_cogl_multitexture_quad_single_primitive (rects[i].position,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipeline,
fallback_layers,
rects[i].tex_coords,
rects[i].tex_coords_len);
/* NB: If _cogl_multitexture_quad_single_primitive fails then it
* means the user tried to use texture repeat with a texture that
* can't be repeated by the GPU (e.g. due to waste or use of
* GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB) */
if (success)
continue;
}
/* If multitexturing failed or we are drawing with a sliced texture
* then we only support a single layer so we pluck out the texture
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* from the first pipeline layer... */
layers = _cogl_pipeline_get_layers (pipeline);
first_layer = layers->data;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
tex_handle = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_texture (first_layer);
if (rects[i].tex_coords)
tex_coords = rects[i].tex_coords;
else
tex_coords = default_tex_coords;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
clamp_s = (_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_mode_s (first_layer) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_CLAMP_TO_EDGE);
clamp_t = (_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_mode_t (first_layer) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_CLAMP_TO_EDGE);
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
COGL_NOTE (DRAW, "Drawing Tex Quad (Multi-Prim Mode)");
_cogl_texture_quad_multiple_primitives (tex_handle,
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipeline,
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
clamp_s, clamp_t,
rects[i].position,
tex_coords[0],
tex_coords[1],
tex_coords[2],
tex_coords[3]);
}
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
#if 0
/* XXX: The current journal doesn't handle changes to the model view matrix
* so for now we force a flush at the end of every primitive. */
_cogl_journal_flush ();
[cogl] Improving Cogl journal to minimize driver overheads + GPU state changes Previously the journal was always flushed at the end of _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords, (i.e. the end of any cogl_rectangle* calls) but now we have broadened the potential for batching geometry. In ideal circumstances we will only flush once per scene. In summary the journal works like this: When you use any of the cogl_rectangle* APIs then nothing is emitted to the GPU at this point, we just log one or more quads into the journal. A journal entry consists of the quad coordinates, an associated material reference, and a modelview matrix. Ideally the journal only gets flushed once at the end of a scene, but in fact there are things to consider that may cause unwanted flushing, including: - modifying materials mid-scene This is because each quad in the journal has an associated material reference (i.e. not copy), so if you try and modify a material that is already referenced in the journal we force a flush first) NOTE: For now this means you should avoid using cogl_set_source_color() since that currently uses a single shared material. Later we should change it to use a pool of materials that is recycled when the journal is flushed. - modifying any state that isn't currently logged, such as depth, fog and backface culling enables. The first thing that happens when flushing, is to upload all the vertex data associated with the journal into a single VBO. We then go through a process of splitting up the journal into batches that have compatible state so they can be emitted to the GPU together. This is currently broken up into 3 levels so we can stagger the state changes: 1) we break the journal up according to changes in the number of material layers associated with logged quads. The number of layers in a material determines the stride of the associated vertices, so we have to update our vertex array offsets at this level. (i.e. calling gl{Vertex,Color},Pointer etc) 2) we further split batches up according to material compatability. (e.g. materials with different textures) We flush material state at this level. 3) Finally we split batches up according to modelview changes. At this level we update the modelview matrix and actually emit the actual draw command. This commit is largely about putting the initial design in-place; this will be followed by other changes that take advantage of the extended batching.
2009-06-17 17:46:42 +00:00
#endif
}
void
cogl_rectangles (const float *verts,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-10 01:57:32 +00:00
unsigned int n_rects)
{
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect *rects;
int i;
/* XXX: All the cogl_rectangle* APIs normalize their input into an array of
* _CoglMutiTexturedRect rectangles and pass these on to our work horse;
* _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords.
*/
rects = g_alloca (n_rects * sizeof (struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect));
for (i = 0; i < n_rects; i++)
{
rects[i].position = &verts[i * 4];
rects[i].tex_coords = NULL;
rects[i].tex_coords_len = 0;
}
_cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords (rects, n_rects);
}
void
cogl_rectangles_with_texture_coords (const float *verts,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-10 01:57:32 +00:00
unsigned int n_rects)
{
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect *rects;
int i;
/* XXX: All the cogl_rectangle* APIs normalize their input into an array of
* _CoglMutiTexturedRect rectangles and pass these on to our work horse;
* _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords.
*/
rects = g_alloca (n_rects * sizeof (struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect));
for (i = 0; i < n_rects; i++)
{
rects[i].position = &verts[i * 8];
rects[i].tex_coords = &verts[i * 8 + 4];
rects[i].tex_coords_len = 4;
}
_cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords (rects, n_rects);
}
void
cogl_rectangle_with_texture_coords (float x_1,
float y_1,
float x_2,
float y_2,
float tx_1,
float ty_1,
float tx_2,
float ty_2)
{
const float position[4] = {x_1, y_1, x_2, y_2};
const float tex_coords[4] = {tx_1, ty_1, tx_2, ty_2};
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect rect;
/* XXX: All the cogl_rectangle* APIs normalize their input into an array of
* _CoglMutiTexturedRect rectangles and pass these on to our work horse;
* _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords.
*/
rect.position = position;
rect.tex_coords = tex_coords;
rect.tex_coords_len = 4;
_cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords (&rect, 1);
}
void
cogl_rectangle_with_multitexture_coords (float x_1,
float y_1,
float x_2,
float y_2,
const float *user_tex_coords,
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-10 01:57:32 +00:00
int user_tex_coords_len)
{
const float position[4] = {x_1, y_1, x_2, y_2};
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect rect;
/* XXX: All the cogl_rectangle* APIs normalize their input into an array of
* _CoglMutiTexturedRect rectangles and pass these on to our work horse;
* _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords.
*/
rect.position = position;
rect.tex_coords = user_tex_coords;
rect.tex_coords_len = user_tex_coords_len;
_cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords (&rect, 1);
}
void
cogl_rectangle (float x_1,
float y_1,
float x_2,
float y_2)
{
const float position[4] = {x_1, y_1, x_2, y_2};
struct _CoglMutiTexturedRect rect;
/* XXX: All the cogl_rectangle* APIs normalize their input into an array of
* _CoglMutiTexturedRect rectangles and pass these on to our work horse;
* _cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords.
*/
rect.position = position;
rect.tex_coords = NULL;
rect.tex_coords_len = 0;
_cogl_rectangles_with_multitexture_coords (&rect, 1);
}
typedef struct _AppendTexCoordsState
{
const CoglTextureVertex *vertices_in;
int vertex;
int layer;
float *vertices_out;
} AppendTexCoordsState;
gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
append_tex_coord_attributes_cb (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
int layer_index,
void *user_data)
{
AppendTexCoordsState *state = user_data;
CoglHandle tex_handle;
float tx, ty;
float *t;
tx = state->vertices_in[state->vertex].tx;
ty = state->vertices_in[state->vertex].ty;
/* COGL_INVALID_HANDLE textures will be handled in
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_flush_layers_gl_state but there is no need to worry
* about scaling texture coordinates in this case */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
tex_handle = _cogl_pipeline_get_layer_texture (pipeline, layer_index);
if (tex_handle != COGL_INVALID_HANDLE)
_cogl_texture_transform_coords_to_gl (tex_handle, &tx, &ty);
/* NB: [X,Y,Z,TX,TY...,R,G,B,A,...] */
t = state->vertices_out + 3 + 2 * state->layer;
t[0] = tx;
t[1] = ty;
state->layer++;
return TRUE;
}
typedef struct _ValidateState
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *original_pipeline;
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
} ValidateState;
gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
validate_layer_cb (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
int layer_index,
void *user_data)
{
ValidateState *state = user_data;
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
/* By default COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC becomes
* GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE but we want the polygon API to use GL_REPEAT to
* maintain compatibility with previous releases
*/
cogl-material: Add support for setting the wrap mode for a layer Previously, Cogl's texture coordinate system was effectively always GL_REPEAT so that if an application specifies coordinates outside the range 0→1 it would get repeated copies of the texture. It would however change the mode to GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE if all of the coordinates are in the range 0→1 so that in the common case that the whole texture is being drawn with linear filtering it will not blend in edge pixels from the opposite sides. This patch adds the option for applications to change the wrap mode per layer. There are now three wrap modes: 'repeat', 'clamp-to-edge' and 'automatic'. The automatic map mode is the default and it implements the previous behaviour. The wrap mode can be changed for the s and t coordinates independently. I've tried to make the internals support setting the r coordinate but as we don't support 3D textures yet I haven't exposed any public API for it. The texture backends still have a set_wrap_mode virtual but this value is intended to be transitory and it will be changed whenever the material is flushed (although the backends are expected to cache it so that it won't use too many GL calls). In my understanding this value was always meant to be transitory and all primitives were meant to set the value before drawing. However there were comments suggesting that this is not the expected behaviour. In particular the vertex buffer drawing code never set a wrap mode so it would end up with whatever the texture was previously used for. These issues are now fixed because the material will always set the wrap modes. There is code to manually implement clamp-to-edge for textures that can't be hardware repeated. However this doesn't fully work because it relies on being able to draw the stretched parts using quads with the same values for tx1 and tx2. The texture iteration code doesn't support this so it breaks. This is a separate bug and it isn't trivially solved. When flushing a material there are now extra options to set wrap mode overrides. The overrides are an array of values for each layer that specifies an override for the s, t or r coordinates. The primitives use this to implement the automatic wrap mode. cogl_polygon also uses it to set GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER mode for its trick to render sliced textures. Although this code has been added it looks like the sliced trick has been broken for a while and I haven't attempted to fix it here. I've added a constant to represent the maximum number of layers that a material supports so that I can size the overrides array. I've set it to 32 because as far as I can tell we have that limit imposed anyway because the other flush options use a guint32 to store a flag about each layer. The overrides array ends up adding 32 bytes to each flush options struct which may be a concern. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063
2010-04-01 10:31:33 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (cogl_pipeline_get_layer_wrap_mode_s (pipeline, layer_index) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (state->original_pipeline == state->pipeline)
state->pipeline = cogl_pipeline_copy (pipeline);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
cogl_pipeline_set_layer_wrap_mode_s (state->pipeline, layer_index,
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_REPEAT);
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (cogl_pipeline_get_layer_wrap_mode_t (pipeline, layer_index) ==
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_AUTOMATIC)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (state->original_pipeline == state->pipeline)
state->pipeline = cogl_pipeline_copy (pipeline);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
cogl_pipeline_set_layer_wrap_mode_t (state->pipeline, layer_index,
COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_REPEAT);
}
return TRUE;
}
void
cogl_polygon (const CoglTextureVertex *vertices,
unsigned int n_vertices,
gboolean use_color)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
ValidateState validate_state;
int n_layers;
int n_attributes;
CoglVertexAttribute **attributes;
int i;
unsigned int stride;
gsize stride_bytes;
CoglVertexArray *vertex_array;
float *v;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipeline = cogl_get_source ();
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
validate_state.original_pipeline = pipeline;
validate_state.pipeline = pipeline;
cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer (pipeline,
validate_layer_cb,
&validate_state);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipeline = validate_state.pipeline;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
n_layers = cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline);
n_attributes = 1 + n_layers + (use_color ? 1 : 0);
attributes = g_alloca (sizeof (CoglVertexAttribute *) * (n_attributes + 1));
attributes[n_attributes] = NULL;
/* Our data is arranged like:
* [X, Y, Z, TX0, TY0, TX1, TY1..., R, G, B, A,...] */
stride = 3 + (2 * n_layers) + (use_color ? 1 : 0);
stride_bytes = stride * sizeof (float);
/* Make sure there is enough space in the global vertex array. This
* is used so we can render the polygon with a single call to OpenGL
* but still support any number of vertices */
g_array_set_size (ctx->polygon_vertices, n_vertices * stride);
vertex_array = cogl_vertex_array_new (n_vertices * stride_bytes);
attributes[0] =
cogl_vertex_attribute_new (vertex_array,
"cogl_position_in",
stride_bytes,
0,
3,
COGL_VERTEX_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_FLOAT);
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++)
{
const char *names[] = {
"cogl_tex_coord0_in",
"cogl_tex_coord1_in",
"cogl_tex_coord2_in",
"cogl_tex_coord3_in",
"cogl_tex_coord4_in",
"cogl_tex_coord5_in",
"cogl_tex_coord6_in",
"cogl_tex_coord7_in"
};
char *name = i < 8 ? (char *)names[i] :
g_strdup_printf ("cogl_tex_coord%d_in", i);
attributes[i + 1] =
cogl_vertex_attribute_new (vertex_array,
name,
stride_bytes,
/* NB: [X,Y,Z,TX,TY...,R,G,B,A,...] */
12 + 8 * i,
2,
COGL_VERTEX_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_FLOAT);
}
if (use_color)
{
attributes[n_attributes - 1] =
cogl_vertex_attribute_new (vertex_array,
"cogl_color_in",
stride_bytes,
/* NB: [X,Y,Z,TX,TY...,R,G,B,A,...] */
12 + 8 * n_layers,
4,
COGL_VERTEX_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_UNSIGNED_BYTE);
}
/* Convert the vertices into an array of float vertex attributes */
v = (float *)ctx->polygon_vertices->data;
for (i = 0; i < n_vertices; i++)
{
AppendTexCoordsState append_tex_coords_state;
guint8 *c;
/* NB: [X,Y,Z,TX,TY...,R,G,B,A,...] */
v[0] = vertices[i].x;
v[1] = vertices[i].y;
v[2] = vertices[i].z;
append_tex_coords_state.vertices_in = vertices;
append_tex_coords_state.vertex = i;
append_tex_coords_state.layer = 0;
append_tex_coords_state.vertices_out = v;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer (pipeline,
append_tex_coord_attributes_cb,
&append_tex_coords_state);
if (use_color)
{
/* NB: [X,Y,Z,TX,TY...,R,G,B,A,...] */
c = (guint8 *) (v + 3 + 2 * n_layers);
c[0] = cogl_color_get_red_byte (&vertices[i].color);
c[1] = cogl_color_get_green_byte (&vertices[i].color);
c[2] = cogl_color_get_blue_byte (&vertices[i].color);
c[3] = cogl_color_get_alpha_byte (&vertices[i].color);
}
v += stride;
}
v = (float *)ctx->polygon_vertices->data;
cogl_buffer_set_data (COGL_BUFFER (vertex_array),
0,
(const guint8 *)v,
ctx->polygon_vertices->len * sizeof (float));
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
cogl_push_source (pipeline);
cogl_draw_vertex_attributes_array (COGL_VERTICES_MODE_TRIANGLE_FAN,
0, n_vertices,
attributes);
cogl_pop_source ();
}