isa/mutter
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/brl/mutter.git synced 2024-09-20 06:25:51 -04:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
181176bdb1
mutter/doc/CODING_STYLE

51 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
Cogl Coding Style
--------------------
This document is intended to be a short description of the preferred
coding style to be used for the Cogl source code.
Coding style is a matter of consistency, readability and maintainance;
coding style is also completely arbitrary and a matter of taste. This
document will use examples at the very least to provide authoritative
and consistent answers to common questions regarding the coding style,
and will also try to identify the allowed exceptions.
The Cogl coding style is currently defined relative to the Clutter
coding style, so please first read clutter/docs/CODING_STYLE.
Differences to the Clutter coding style:
+ Headers
Cogl headers are not exempt from the 80 characters limit as they are in
Clutter. Function prototypes should not be arranged into vertical
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the Gnome developer community. Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax highlighting which didn't seem that compelling. Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers who might potentially contribute to Cogl. So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead. Instead of gsize we now use size_t For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
columns but should instead look somthing like this:
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
void
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the Gnome developer community. Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax highlighting which didn't seem that compelling. Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers who might potentially contribute to Cogl. So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead. Instead of gsize we now use size_t For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
my_function (CoglType type,
CoglType *a_pointer,
CoglType another_type);
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
+ Types
Avoid the use of redundant glib typedefs and wherever possible simply
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the Gnome developer community. Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax highlighting which didn't seem that compelling. Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers who might potentially contribute to Cogl. So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead. Instead of gsize we now use size_t For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
use ANSI C/c99 types.
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
The following types should not be used:
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the Gnome developer community. Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax highlighting which didn't seem that compelling. Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers who might potentially contribute to Cogl. So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead. Instead of gsize we now use size_t For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
gint, guint, gfloat, gdouble, glong, gulong, gchar, guchar,
guint{8,16,32} or gint{8,16,32}
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
Instead use:
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the Gnome developer community. Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax highlighting which didn't seem that compelling. Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers who might potentially contribute to Cogl. So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead. Instead of gsize we now use size_t For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
int, unsigned int, float, double, long, unsigned long, char,
unsigned char, uint{8,16,32}_t and int{8,16,32}_t
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the Gnome developer community. Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax highlighting which didn't seem that compelling. Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers who might potentially contribute to Cogl. So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead. Instead of gsize we now use size_t For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-04-16 16:56:40 -04:00
Use CoglBool for boolean types.
When ever you need a byte size type for dealing with pixel data then
uint8_t should be used.
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest
range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so
- especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of
foreign looking typedefs.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink