Before this, creating a separate instance of `Location.Indicator` failed
because it tries to create export the same DBus path.
This is useful for extensions adding panels on multiple monitors. But
it also seems like a cleaner design to separate the indicator widget
from the logically separate role as a Geoclue agent.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1919>
We build controls layout using the whole monitor vertical space as
available, however extensions or external apps in X11 may reduce the
workarea size horizontally and the shell should always take care of it.
Given that we're already assuming that the allocation is monitor-based
and that we're adjusting it to the workarea, we can just make it more
explicit by using a workarea box that is used as the allocation area.
As per this, we also apply the same logic of applied to the vertical
dimension to the horizontal one.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1892>
To compute the available height for the layout we're currently using the
panel position, while this works for the current and default setup, the
shell may be configured to use a different workarea, so we should rely on
it to compute the available space, instead of a specific widget.
So get the current monitor index for the current view and use its coordinates
instead.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1892>
The background group is currently allocated taking care of the workarea
x, y offset but not of its width/height and this may lead to building a
wrongly sized workspace view when the workarea size is not matching the
monitor size (like when there are struts set).
So, take care of the difference between the workarea and monitor
absolute end coordinates to allocate the background scaled content box.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1892>
We currently disable all network items on both the lock- and login
screen. While it makes sense to be very restrictive on the lock screen,
there are some (fringe) use cases for being more permissive on the
login screen (like remote home directories only accessible via VPN).
There's precedence with the power-off/restart actions to be less
restrictive on the login screen, and since we started respecting
the `network-control` polkit action, it's possible to restore the
old behavior if desired.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
NetworkManager installs a `network-control` polkit action that can
be used to disallow network configuration, except that we happily
ignore it. Add it to the conditions that turn a network section
insensitive.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
Setting up a connection for an Enterprise WPA(2) encrypted wireless
network requires Settings. That's not available when windows are
disabled via the session mode, so filter out affected entries.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
The item launches the corresponding Settings panel when activated, which
doesn't work when windows are disabled by the session mode. Rather than
failing silently, turn the item insensitive.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
Unaccelerated deltas make sure the gesture works the same regardless of how
fast the fingers move; this is what we were already doing for scrolling.
Remove the swipe multiplier as the deltas already match scrolling other than
the 1/10 multiplier Clutter applies to scrolling specifically.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1763>
Since commit 3fb02843, we no longer skip allocation for
results that don't fit the width, and give them a 0x0
allocation instead.
That has the unintended side effect of those children now
being available to keynav. There are cases where we want
0-sized actors to be part of the focus chain (e.g. FocusTrap),
but this isn't one of them, so explicitly exclude 0-sized
children from keynav.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4470
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1916>
Destroying the source from an action callback will result in the
notification being destroyed twice:
- source.destroy() destroys all its notifications
- a notification destroys itself after an action
was activated
This results in unwanted log spam when attempting to dispose the
notification for a second time.
There is actually no good reason for destroying the source explicitly,
as sources already self-destruct with their last notification.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4457
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1908>
Currently we only mark the banner as removed if it is destroyed
while in SHOWN or SHOWING state, but not if we're already HIDING
(for example in response to `NotificationBanner::done-displaying`).
If this happens, we'll try to destroy the notification again at
the end of the transition, which leads to (harmless but annoying)
log spam since Notifications were turned into GObjects (that are
disposed when destroyed).
Address this by always marking destroyed banners as removed, while
still only triggering a state update while shown (or in the process
of being shown).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4457
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1908>
These do some some signals connection and monitor layout tracking
that we forget to disconnect when the magnifier is disconnected.
This causes warnings if enabling the magnifier, disabling it,
switching to another tty, and back. (Presumably also happens for
monitor hotplugs).
This signal should just stay connected as long as it's needed,
so add a setEnabled() method on the CrossHairs actor that we
can hook on the magnifier.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1902>
Some popovers like the ibus candidate popover may be requested while
showing an unredirected fullscreen window. Disable unredirection
while the popover is visible so that it can actually be shown.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1900>
When implementing a D-Bus method synchronously, regular JS methods are
used. That is, whatever the method returns is passed as return value
to the method invocation.
However for asynchronous implementations, we need to explicitly return
a value to the invocation, otherwise the caller will wait until it times
out eventually.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1891>
The appDisplay used to be accessible via the viewSelector, but
that is gone now. Commit c09c070b15 adjusted the code, but the
replacement uses a Main.overview.appDisplay accessor that never
existed, whoops.
Fix this by exposing a new selectApp() method directly on the
overview, so we don't have to shuffle the appDisplay through
controls → overviewActor → overview.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1891>
With Xwayland started on demand, mutter/gnome-shell will spawn Xwayland
and GNOME settings daemon Xsettings.
Currently, gnome-shell uses a timeout of 5 seconds before canceling the
launch and declare failure to start X11 services.
While 5 seconds may seem like a lot of time, when this is executed on a
virtual machine part of a QA tests under load, this causes random
failures.
There is no good value here, we could increase the timeout but it will
always remain racy. Instead, remove the timeout, systemd itself already
has a timeout mechanism (with a much longer wait time).
Thanks to Benjamin Berg <bberg@redhat.com> for finding the root cause
and suggesting the fix.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1888>
Right now we pop the modal immediately when closing, so the key-release
event of the Escape key ends up in the focus window which may consume it
for leaving fullscreen mode or similar.
We can avoid that in many cases by keeping the modal grab until the end
of the transition, as the key-release event will then likely occur while
the grab is still in place (provided animations are enabled).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1880>
If parsing the pipeline fails for some reason, we currently end up
with a zombie session that leads to a stuck recording indicator in
gnome-shell.
Instead, properly tear down the session to allow mutter and gnome-shell
to correctly update their state.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1878>
org.freedesktop.impl.portal.desktop.gnome will be used for the
GNOME implementation of desktop portals in the future, so make
sure GNOME Shell's implementation of the access portal won't
conflict.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1872>
Another trivial cleanup. This is in preparation for next commit, that
will expand on this if clause, and will make it a bit more complicated.
Using a variable here makes it easier to read.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1866>
Often, when using multiple monitors, the thumbnails box may be
destroyed before the 'hidden' signal of the Overview is emitted,
which leaves a bunch of lingering signal connections to the
workspace manager.
Call this._destroyThumbnails() in the _onDestroy handler, which
disconnects from workspace manager. This fixes the some of the log
spam that GNOME Shell produces with backtraces of destroyed actors.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1860>
On systems/setups not using systemd, a failure to start gsd-xsettings
with NOT_SUPPORTED does not denote a failure to start Xwayland, just
that we're not using systemd.
In that case, we should just ignore the error, otherwise it will prevent
Xwayland to start on such systems/setups without systemd.
Thanks to Rose Kunkel (@rosekunkel) for spotting the issue/suggesting
the fix.
Fixes: 019229c40e - windowManager: Return failure to start X11 services
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4284
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1850>
Currently, handling of touch devices in the app grid is a bit awkward,
paging by dragging the view can only happen if started from the gaps
between icons, trying to drag from an icon will trigger DnD, and popping
up the menu takes over it all.
Instead, have the app grid actions play this game of rock-paper-scissors:
- Fast swipes on icons trigger scrolling, beats DnD and menu
- Slower press-and-drag on icons trigger DnD, beats scrolling and menu
- Long press triggers menu, beats scrolling, is beaten by DnD
This allows quick swipes to handle navigation, while still allowing the
fine grained operations. DnD, when triggered, dismisses the menu, if
shown.
This all could probably be nicer with a more stateful gesture framework,
we're not there yet though.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3849
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1774>
