The code is complicated by requiring overflow, and in order to incrementally
improve the code to match the designs, remove overflow.
In the new design, we'll have a fixed number of menu items, and Wi-Fi
will be done by a separate design, so we can't be too concerned with
the menu not fitting on the screen.
This is a part of the new system status design, see
https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Guidelines/SystemStatus/
for design details.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704670
According to Dan Williams, if firmware is installed the device
will disappear and reappear, and this is unlikely to change any
time soon. Just make our lives easier by removing the tracking.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704670
I intended to make a few code cleanups, but I apparently forgot
to hook up _updateAccessPoint. Merge it with _activeApChanged,
which is where the notify::active-access-point signal is actually
hooked up to.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704670
This is a regression from splitting the slider out that never got fixed.
Restore the previous (useful) behavior by adding a public API to the
slider that lets us pass an event through.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704368
_updateIcon should not attempt to sync any active connections, as the
icon-changed signal can be emitted in response to something done during
_syncActiveConnection. In the case of VPN, removeActiveConnection would
cause an icon-changed signal to be emitted immediately, but the state
would not be updated, causing us to call removeActiveConnection over and
over.
Explicitly sync all active connections when we know it needs to be done,
and simply make _updateIcon synchronize with the current device's icon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703565
The status item will go away soon, so make sure the one-time
fire is given its own function. At the same time, only connect
to the signal when the situation actually matters.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701954
No class in here has this.carrier as a property. Presumably, this was
meant to be this.device.carrier, but since this code is going to be
rewritten soon anyway, might as well just junk the never-working
code for now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701954
In BlueZ 4, Authorize() was used to authorize both service
and JustWorks authorization requests. In BlueZ 5 these two
have been split into AuthorizeService() for services and
RequestAuthorization for JustWorks devices. Adapt the
Bluetooth code accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700891
This can be more easily achieved by listening for changes to the
device's active-connection property. VPN will still need support to
track active connections, as it does not have an associated
device. But as VPN can track multiple active connections, the names
"set" and "clear" don't quite fit. Rename them to the more-standard
"add" and "remove".
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701954
As multiple-connections for a Wi-Fi AP won't fit in the new design,
remove submenus right now. Simply make a simple item that connects
to the first known connection for the AP, which should be the common
case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698918
This is a singleton object inside libibus which means that if we
destroy it (e.g. because ibus-daemon got restarted) then, other
library users, like the ibus gtk+ IM module that we also use
in-process, will break.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699189
Currently we simply set the gsettings key when activating an input
source. This obviously introduces a time window, between the event that
activates the switch and when the switch is complete, under which key
events are being delivered to applications and interpreted according
to the previous input source.
The patches in bug 696996 introduce a DBus API in g-s-d that allows us
to know when an input source if effectively active. Using that and
freezing keyboard events in the X server until we hear back from g-s-d
we can ensure that events won't be misinterpreted after an input
source switch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697007
Passkey is the proper name to be used when we are pairing with a Bluetooth
2.1+ device. PIN are only used for older devices which is not the case
here, the message is only shown when dealing with 2.1+ devices.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697661
This is technically a smidge slower due to the constant bisect insert,
but since this should only happen when we make a Wi-Fi dialog, it's
insignificant.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700322
