In the case a service is not available (as it can be in the fingereprint
case when a supported reader is available but has not enrolled prints)
we were trying indefinitely to restart it, however this can lead to
troubles since commit 7a2e629b as when the service conversation was
stopped we had no way to figure out this case and we'd end up to
eventually fail the whole authentication.
However, in such cases the PAM services are expected to return a
PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL and gdm to handle it, emitting service-unavailable
signal.
So connect to ::service-unavailable and keep track of the unavailable
services so that we can avoid retrying with them.
In case such service is not the foreground one, we can just silently
ignore the error as we did before commit 7a2e629b, without bothering
failing the whole verification.
In case we got a valid error message on service-unavailable, we also
show it, this is normally not happening unless GDM isn't redirecting
here other kind of problems (such as MAXTRIES) which are supposed to
stop the authentication stopping any further retry.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3734
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1683>
Currently when the foreground service conversation stops we increase the
verification failed count and try to start it again, while if a
background service has been stopped we just ignore it.
This is causing a various number of issues, for example in the case of
the fingerprint authentication service, it is normally configured to die
after a timeout, and we end up never restarting it (while the UI still
keeps showing to the user the message about swipe/touch the device).
So, in such case let's just consider it a "soft" verification failure
that doesn't increase the failures count but will cause us to reset the
UI and try to restart the authentication (and so the affected service).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
Wiggle may make the error message to be visible for less time so provide
the auth prompt an API to increase the timeout to be used for showing a
message in some cases.
This could be reworked when we'll have a proper asyn wiggle function so
that we could just make the user verifier to "freeze", then await for
the wiggle transition to complete and eventually release the verifier.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
Currently whenever an authentication failure happens we wiggle the
entry, however this may not be related to the service which failed.
For example if the fingerprint authentication failed for whatever reason,
there's no point to wiggle the text input as it's something unrelated to it.
So, only apply the wiggle effect to the entry in case the failure is
coming from the querying service.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
By giving to the AuthPrompt information regarding the source service
name (and so the ability to know whether it's a foreground service) can
give it the ability to behave differently.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
Fingerprint PAM module can have multiple failures during a runtime
and we rely on the pam module configuration for the maximum allowed
retries.
However, while that setting should be always followed, we should never
ignore the login-screen's allowed-failures setting that can provide
a lower value.
So, once we have a fingerprint failure let's count it to increase our
internal fail counter, and when we've reached the limit we can emit a
verification-failed signal to our clients.
As per this we need also to ignore any further 'info' messages that we
could receive from the fingerprint service, as it may be configured to
handle more retries than us and they might arrive before we have
cancelled the verification session.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
Decouple the verification failure count increase from
_verificationFailed as there are some cases in which we may want to
increase it without emitting a verification-failed signal.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
When the login/lock screen is shown the error messages for background
services are always ignored.
However, in case the service is the fingerprint authentication method
we still want to be able to show error messages to inform the user
about what failed, and eventually that the max retries (that may be
different from the login screen configuration) has been reached.
This handles partially the design issue [1] related to the login/lock
screen fingerprint authentication.
Eventually we want to use pam extensions to use clearer and parse-able
messages, however in the case of the fingerprint service we can be sure
that the fprint PAM module will only send errors on auth failures.
[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Design/os-mockups/-/issues/56
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1652>
When verification failed using a specific authentication service we're
currently restarting the whole user authentication system, which leads
to lots of unneeded operations (reinitializing a new user verifier proxy,
restarting all the gdm workers with the relative PAM modules and so on).
And this makes also debugging of login problems more complicated, given
we're cluttering the journal with repeated data.
However, at reauthentication failure GDM has already set up for us an
user verifier that we can use reuse to start only the service that had a
failure. So when possible, just start a new service instead of rebooting
the whole authorization process.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
When retrying the authentication we should make sure that all the
previously initiated services are stopped in order to begin a new
authentication session with all the configured services.
Unfortunately at the current state we only dispose the currently used
user verifier, but we don't make it to stop all the relative gdm workers
and then they'll stay around potentially blocking any further usage of
them (as it happens with the fingerprint one, that has unique access to
the device).
So, cancel the currently running authentication before starting a new
one if we're explicitly retrying.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
In case a background service such as the fingerprint authentication
fails to start we'd just mark the whole authentication process as
failed.
Currently this may happen by just putting a wrong password when an user
has some fingerprints enrolled, the fingerprint gdm authentication
worker may take some time to restart leading to a failure and this is
currently also making the password authentication to fail:
JS ERROR: Failed to start gdm-fingerprint for u: Gio.DBusError:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.Failed:
Could not create authentication helper process
_promisify/proto[asyncFunc]/</<@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/overrides/Gio.js:435:45
### Promise created here: ###
_startService@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:470:42
_beginVerification@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:495:18
_getUserVerifier@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:405:14
async*_openReauthenticationChannel@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:378:22
async*begin@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:194:18
_retry@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:561:14
_verificationFailed/signalId<@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:584:30
_emit@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/_signals.js:133:47
finishMessageQueue@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:268:14
_queueMessageTimeout@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:273:18
_queueMessageTimeout/this._messageQueueTimeoutId<@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:288:65
Given that background services are ignored even for queries or any kind
of message, we should not fail the authentication request unless the
default service fails.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
When a verification session has failed we may want to wait for the user
to have completed all the waiting queries and to have read all the
incoming messages, however during such time an user verifier should
not be allowed to queue further messages to the UI, as we're about to
completely stop the identification or start a new one.
Unfortunately this is not true because we're still connected to the
identifier signals, and so we may still show messages.
This is particularly true when using the fingerprint PAM module as it
may restart the authentication while we're in the process of stopping
it.
So, keep track of all the signals we've connected to, and disconnect on
verification failed and during cancel/clear operations.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
Answering a query may be delayed to the moment in which we've not any
more messages in the queue, however this case can also happen just after
we've cleared the UserVerifier and in such case we'd have nothing to
answer, but we currently throw an error:
JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: no-more-messages:
TypeError: this._userVerifier is null
answerQuery/signalId<@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:249:17
_emit@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/_signals.js:133:47
finishMessageQueue@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:266:14
_clearMessageQueue@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:301:14
clear@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:223:14
cancel@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/util.js:205:18
reset@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/authPrompt.js:482:32
cancel@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/authPrompt.js:569:14
vfunc_key_press_event@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/authPrompt.js:128
So handle this case more gracefully keeping track of the current
cancellable and checking whether it is still valid before trying to answer
a query or do a delayed action.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
As per previous commit the user can cancel an ongoing authentication via
Escape key and that will always send the user back to the clock view in
lockscreen or user-selection view in login prompt.
However, we can be a little more permissive and don't switch view to be
able to restart the authentication without further action.
To avoid this to be abused though, we consider the user verification
cancellation via escape key to be a "soft-failure", so once the
configured "allowed-failures" gsettings value has been reached, we'd
just act as before, ignoring any further request (until we don't get
back to the user auth view).
In this way we still make brute-force attacks harder to do, while still
giving the well-behaving user some ability to fix mistakes.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
Escape key is supposed to cancel a verification, however if the user
already hit Enter to begin the authentication the Escape key won't work
until the verification completed.
This may be quite inconvenient when an user did a typo while writing and
wants to cancel the already started auth.
So, while authenticating (or in general while the entry is unsensitive)
give the key focus to the authpromt itself so that we can still get the
input events and cancel an user action.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
When a cancel event in the user lockscreen happens we first emit a reset
signal and immediately a cancelled one.
This lead to start a new gdm worker for each enabled authentication
method and then immediately to stop it.
As per the previous commit, we don't have anymore dangling gdm workers
around, but still we should not even start a new one in such case.
So, when the user explicitly cancelled the authentication session, first
emit a cancelled event and only emit a reset event with a begin request
if we are outside the lockscreen.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
When we cancel an user authentication via Escape key or cancel button on
AuthPrompt we reset the view and we emit a 'cancelled' signal that leads
to destroying the auth prompt and the user verifier.
However, the verifier may still have an operation in progress and its
completion may take some time (as in the case of gdm-fingerprint), but
we just leave the gdm worker running until its pam module completes
(potentially never) clearing and disposing its handle.
So, instead of just clearing the verify, actually cancel and clear it.
In case the user verifier is set, clearing the relevant data will happen
anyway as part of the cancel() call.
Ideally this would have been handled by gdm itself, but unfortunately we
can't fix it there because the verifier itself is a class generated by
gdbus-codegen, so we can't handle this automatically on disposal nor we
can automatically monitor when the caller proxy is stopped on our side.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3654
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
The reason this wasn't using the Gio.DBus.makeProxyWrapper() convenience API is that it passes custom flags to the proxy, and that wasn't supported by the wrapper at the time.
As this is now possible, this commit migrates us to the new API.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1572>
Plain classes are private to their file, so accessing them from
another module results in the following warning:
That property was defined with 'let' or 'const' inside the module.
This was previously supported, but is not correct according to the
ES6 standard.
Fix by assigning the class to a public variable instead.
(Eventually switching to ES6 modules with proper imports/exports will
fix this as well)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1512>
The purpose of password peeking is to spot and correct errors;
the latter isn't possible when the entry is non-editable, so
we can hide the password again while authentication is ongoing.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3138
At the moment, if a user switches to the login screen vt,
the login screen fades in whatever was on screen prior, and
then does a reset.
It makes more sense to reset first, so we fade in what the
user is going to interact with instead of what they interacted
with before.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2997
The previous commit implemented a new CredentialManager interface to
facilitate adding additional providers for pre-authenticating the user
at the login screen.
This commit implements a new credential manager using that interface
for vmware deployments.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1983
Commit 4cda61a1 added support for pre-authenticated logins in
oVirt environments. This feature prevents a user from having
to type their password twice (once to the oVirt management machine,
and then immediately again in the provisioned guest running gnome-shell).
That feature is currently oVirt specific, but a similar feature would
be useful in non-oVirt based virt farm environments.
Toward that end, this commit generalizes the various aspects of the
oVirt integration code, so that it can be reused in a subsequent
commit for adding single sign on support in vmware deployments, too.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1983
ClutterActor provides the same function, but with a different return
value. So since we already switched to the ClutterActor implementation
in our C code, we can now safely remove st_widget_get_resource_scale()
and update the JS code that's still using the old API.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1287
We currently let the entry of the autoPrompt grab the key focus inside
setQuestion(), which is called from _onAskQuestion(), which is the
callback of the "ask-question" signal.
It seems that the "ask-question" signal isn't emitted again right after
the password-check failed, but a few seconds after that. Since we get
the "verification-failed" signal earlier than "ask-question" (right
after we know the check failed) and we also get a hint whether the entry
should be usable again with the canRetry argument, we can also grab key
focus to in the same step.
So do that by grabbing key focus when making the entry sensitive.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2655
We want the spinner to be centered with regard to the entry, but
constraining the height breaks that:
1. clutter_actor_allocate() is called with the available size
2. clutter_actor_update_constraints() then adjusts that according
to the constraints
3. clutter_actor_adjust_allocation() applies the margin/expand/align
properties.
The issue there is that 2. reduces the allocation to the desired size,
so there is no more extra space to distribute in 3.
We can fix this by either constraining everything (and rely on the
cancel button's alignment) or limit the constraint to the width. The
latter seems more appropriate, given that the constraint is only used
to center the entry horizontally.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2628
Promises make asynchronous operations easier to manage, in particular
when used through the async/await syntax that allows for asynchronous
code to closely resemble synchronous one.
gjs has included a Gio._promisify() helper for a while now, which
monkey-patches methods that follow GIO's async pattern to return a
Promise when called without a callback argument.
Use that to get rid of all those GAsyncReadyCallbacks!
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1126
Commit 55b57421d changed signal handlers to the corresponding vfuncs,
but didn't always chain up as necessary. In most places this doesn't
matter, but at the very least the commit broke activating message list
items via the keyboard.
Add all (hopefully) the missing chain-ups to get the expected behavior
back.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2319
Visually the button is just an interactive label, so having the
interactive area extend to the empty space next to the label
is surprising.
Instead, left-align the whole button rather than just the label
inside, so the clickable area corresponds to the visible one.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1046
We turned both the auth prompt's cancel button and the switch user
button into icon buttons now, which means they are completely cryptic
when using a screen reader.
Just use the previously used labels as accessible names, which has the
nice side effect of lowering the impact of the string freeze break.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
The button is hidden on the lock screen, so it shouldn't be allowed to
activate it, be it via click or keyboard. The latter is still possible
by keynaving to the button and hitting space/enter. Fix that by making
the button unfocusable when we make it unreactive.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
xgettext gained some support for template strings, and no longer
fails when encountering '/' somewhere between backticks.
Unfortunately its support is still buggy as hell, and it is now
silently dropping translatable strings, yay. I hate making the
code worse, but until xgettext really gets its shit together,
the only viable way forward seems to be to not use template
strings in any files listed in POTFILES.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1014
The design team discussed the ellipses at the end of the hint text of
our entries and, even though they are present in most mockups, it turned
out they don't like them, so remove them.
It also turned out they don't like the prefixes like "Enter" before it,
so remove those, too.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/977
We don't want to show a caps-lock warning when showing a non-password
entry, but we also don't want the layout to jump when changing the
label's visibility.
Achieve that by inserting an empty placeholder label that we can
show whenever the caps-lock warning is hidden.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
Usually, logging in or unlocking the session is made asynchronously,
and AuthPrompt properly manages which entry is currently visible.
External code don't rely on any specific entry to be set, since it
is AuthPrompt's responsibility to select the correct one to be shown.
However, there's one specific case where AuthPrompt must preserve
the password entry: on reset. The reset code preserved whatever
entry was currently displayed, but after fe69dacaf1, it always
changes to the username entry.
Make sure to show the password entry on reset.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
In the past, the session menu button was part of the auth prompt widgetry,
so we didn't have to manually hide it when showing the user list. However,
now it is part of the login screen itself.
Hide the session menu button when the user list is shown.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
Hiding the Caps lock warning label changes the layout of
Auth Prompt. This is specially noticeable when logging in
with unlisted users, where we change the visibility of this
label after typing a username, and the whole user widget
moves a bit.
Change the Cap lock label's opacity instead of hiding it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, AuthPrompt is connecting to its own 'next' signal
signal to react to any of the entries being activated, and do
some actions like starting the spinner and answering the PAM
question.
Refactor this code into another method, and don't connect to
our own signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Unfortunately, the question that is displayed comes directly
from PAM. It usually is just "Password:", which comes from
pam-unix, but other questions can be set, usually with the
colons, since they are crafted with a CLI workflow in mind.
Manually drop the colons from questions asked by PAM. This
is also done by the PolKit agent, which shows how the stack
is fragile, but it's what we have for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
This is a regression from the transition to password entry. Both
entries need to be connected to the relevant signals, otherwise
username-based login won't ever work.
Connect both the text and the password entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, there is a dedicated label above the entry to
display the question text. According to the new mockups
for the lock screen, this label doesn't exist; instead,
the question is set inside the entry itself, as a hint
text.
Set the questions as hint texts of the entry, and remove
the now unused label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
If username-based login flow is followed, we need a default avatar
for the userWidget. Hence, check if the user passed to userWidget
is (null) which implies a username-based login flow.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Allow vertical orientation for the userWidget so that the user-avatar
can be centered and user's name can be placed below it. The plan
for 3.36 is to use this vertical userWidget layout for both lock
and login screen.
The userWidget is also used while creating the user-selection list
at the login, hence we still need to keep the horizontal layout
for userWidget in place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Activating a dialog is slightly different from opening it; the
former is about showing the user authentication widgetry, while
the latter is about creating it and pre-allocating the necessary
resources.
Activate the screen shield dialog when necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Since the wiggle effect will be used by the redesigned prompt-dialogs
and we always want to use the same parameters, move those as defaults
for the wiggle function to the util.js file.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/942
Use the new StPasswordEntry for password entry fields
and remove all direct handling of clutter text of the entry
via clutter_text_set_password_char to show/hide the password
text. StPasswordEntry will provides a peek-password-icon which
will allow to show/hide the password present in the field to
the user in subsequent commits.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/619
Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
ES6 allows to omit property names where they match the name of the
assigned variable, which makes code less redunant and thus cleaner.
We will soon enforce that in our eslint rules, so make sure we use
the shorthand wherever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
Every since commit aa394754, StBoxLayout has supported ClutterActor's
expand/align properties in addition to the container-specific child
properties. Given that that's the only container left with a special
child meta, it's time to fully embrace the generic properties (and
eventually remove the child meta).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/780
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
We now have everything in place to replace Tweener for all animatable
properties with implicit animations, which has the following benefits:
- they run entirely in C, while Tweener requires context switches
to JS each frame
- they are more reliable, as Tweener only detects when an animation
is overwritten with another Tween, while Clutter considers any
property change
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/22
