Since the overlays we show on hover above the window clones are no
longer only a close button, but the window title, a border and a close
button, rename a few variables so it's easier to understand what they're
for.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/346
Currently when a preference widget fails to load, we throw a raw
backtrace at the user. While that is undoubtedly useful information
for extension developers and bug reports, it is gibberish to most
users and hardly the first thing they should be exposed to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/193
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkDirectionType. It's bit-compatible with it,
too. All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkPolicyType. It's bit-compatible with it, too.
All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
This is actually papering over bugs in toolkits. On X11 the Xserver will
send crossing events when the stage input shape changes. As those go
end up ignored in GTK+, this warp call aims (and randomly manages) to send
a motion event that wouldn't go unlistened by the drag source window (the
one holding the grab).
This bug actually manifests in other ways, eg. by changing the window
beneath the pointer with alt-tab while DnDing. This should be fixed
altogether in the client side.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
This gdk_display_sync() call was added in commit a40daa3c22 so the alt-f2
dialog is able to spawn commands that trigger grabs on startup (eg. xmag/
xkill).
This seems worthwhile to do only on the X11 backend, and handling it in
mutter backend code seems cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
Allow notifications to set a x-gnome-privacy-scope hint, with values in
['system', 'user']. If all the notifications in a particular source hint
that their privacy scope is ‘system’, don’t hide the notification
details on the lock screen.
This is aimed at fixing the particular case of power notifications: they
contain information which is not private to the user (it relates to the
system: battery state or AC state, which is obvious to anyone who can
see the machine), so hiding the details of a power management
notification when the screen is locked is pointless.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/726
Most often it is a bug if the condition part of a for-loop contains the
assignment operator rather than the comparison one, so tools rightfully
emit a warning.
Clarify that the assignment is intentional in this case by adding
parentheses.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/375
Just like the "in" operator in the previous patch, "instanceof" has
a lower precedence than negation, resulting in the nonsense condition
of "true instanceof BaseIcon".
Add parentheses to get the intended behavior.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/375
The "in" operator has a lower precedence than negation, so we are
actually testing whether the favorites map contains "false".
Add parentheses to get the intended behavior.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/375
