Previously the animation was not entirely according to the mockup.
Now we are closer to the mockup.
The padding for the indicators are decremented, since we need that
to make the animation not too quick. As a drawback, maybe visually
is not as good as before, or the area to click dots is too much little.
Just make that change for now and test it widely, and we can change
that after.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707565
Since now AllView doesn't have a scrollbar this
padding is not necesary, and will allow to place
the indicators correctly using only the indicators
padding in a upcoming patch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707580
In the commit 9a8bf3b was changed the background opacity of overview
icons. That cause that the shadow of the checked state of icons
was too hard, so it seems to be cut off.
Change the opacity of the shadow to solve this.
If a folder view is scrolled, its scrollbar ends up too close to the
content (even partially overlapping it) with the current padding.
Making it much smaller fixes the issue without affecting the content
position - the removed padding will just move to IconGrid's dynamic
padding.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707662
Organize applications in AllView by pages using the new PaginatedIconGrid
added previously. Pagination is generally a better pattern for collections
than scrolling, as it better suits spacial memory.
Hook into AppDisplay's allocation function to communicate the available
size to the different views before child allocations - this is only
required by the paginated view (as pages must be computed before
calling get_preferred_height/get_preferred_width), but doing it for
all views will guarantee that their dynamic spacing calculation is
based on the same values.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706081
This commit consolidates the styles of the various
message types into one 'login-dialog-message' style
and then adds additional styles on top to cover the
differences.
This allows us to give the message label an initial
style so that is padded properly before any messages
are displayed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706670
These cause annoying allocation cycle warnings, and it's simpler to
just express our desired layout in terms of nested containers.
Adapt the theme to match as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706843
The only point of using a custom container here was to prevent StBoxLayout
from enforcing the wrong request mode based on the orientation. With that
issue fixed, we can simplify the checkbox widget significantly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703811
Adds 15px padding to all sides of provider icon to have padding
which seems equal to that of list-search-result-content. This aligns the
provider icon vertically with the search result content.
Padding is set to 15px as list-search-result-content has 12px padding
and the outer box (list-search-result) has 3px.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695760
This will replace the indicator painted on the stage right now.
This unfortunately does not work for the recorder triggered by the
keybinding -- we'll simply replace the in-shell code with a keybinding
powered by gnome-settings-daemon.
Swap out the implementation of SystemIndicator with a dummy,
and build the aggregate menu. At the same time, remove the
poweroff and login screen menus, as those were fake aggregate
menus beforehand.
We lose some flexibility as we lose session-mode-based menu
layout, but as each component of the aggregate menu is supposed
to be "smart" in response to updating itself when session
state changes, I believe it's better than a declarative model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
We can't silently replace the old behavior of separate status
icons into a new system. Replace SystemStatusButton with a new
SystemIndicator class which will allow for the flexibility we
need. For now, make it a subclass of Button so that it mostly
feels the same, but we'll soon be swapping it out with a dummy
implementation that the aggregate menu will use.
I think the code cleanup here is worth it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
