In the common case where we only have a single unread notification
from a particular app, the count doesn't add useful information.
Reduce clutter a bit by only showing the notification count if we
have at least two.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/997
Clicking or typing to reveal the auth prompt are good options for
mouse/keyboard workflows, but awkward on touch devices. Now that
we have SwipeTracker, adding corresponding gestures support is
easy, so do just that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
The current transition between clock and auth prompt uses a simple
crossfade.
"What kind of spatial model is that?!"
T.B.
Root the transition a bit more by adding translation and scale to
the animation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
Since the blur sigma decides how many pixels get factored in when
blurring and setting a scale factor increases the background texture by
that factor, the sigma value should also be multiplied by the scale
factor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/991
AuthPrompt is the set of actors that contain the user avatar,
the username, and the password entry. With the removal of the
screen shield, the unlock dialog (be it UnlockDialog or the
LoginDialog) is always created, and in the case of UnlockDialog,
so is the auth prompt.
This is problematic, though, since for passwordless accounts,
the simple act of creating AuthPrompt authenticates the user,
and lifts the lock screen.
Create the AuthPrompt on demand in UnlockDialog.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
As per the latest lock screen mockups, critical notifications must have
a more prominent, solid color.
Add a .critical style class to critical notification bubbles, and make
them darker.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Activating a dialog is slightly different from opening it; the
former is about showing the user authentication widgetry, while
the latter is about creating it and pre-allocating the necessary
resources.
Activate the screen shield dialog when necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Use the new StPasswordEntry for password entry fields
and remove all direct handling of clutter text of the entry
via clutter_text_set_password_char to show/hide the password
text. StPasswordEntry will provides a peek-password-icon which
will allow to show/hide the password present in the field to
the user in subsequent commits.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/619
ES6 allows to omit property names where they match the name of the
assigned variable, which makes code less redunant and thus cleaner.
We will soon enforce that in our eslint rules, so make sure we use
the shorthand wherever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
The screen shield creates the unlock dialog based on the session mode.
However since commit 0c0d76f7d6 turned LoginDialog into an actor
subclass (while UnlockDialog kept using the delegate pattern), it is
no longer possible to handle both objects the same way without warnings.
Allow this again by turning UnlockDialog into an actor subclass as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/736
Those unused arguments aren't bugs - unbeknownst to eslint, they all
correspond to valid signal parameters - but they don't contribute
anything to clarity, so just remove them anyway.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
When not using arrow notation with anonymous functions, we use Lang.bind()
to bind `this` to named callbacks. However since ES5, this functionality
is already provided by Function.prototype.bind() - in fact, Lang.bind()
itself uses it when no extra arguments are specified. Just use the built-in
function directly where possible, and use arrow notation in the few places
where we pass additional arguments.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
When set to fill, the label will always end up left-aligned, which
is only correct in LTR locales. Set the alignment explicitly to
work in both RTL and LTR locales.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712638
These cause annoying allocation cycle warnings, and it's simpler to
just express our desired layout in terms of nested containers.
Adapt the theme to match as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706843
This commit introduces a new BeginRequestType enum which gets
passed to the 'reset' signal to specify whether
a username should be provided to the begin() method and changes
the loginDialog to comply.
Currently, the signal only ever gets emitted with
AuthPrompt.BeginRequestType.PROVIDE_USERNAME
but that will change in the future when providing smartcard
support.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
We currently emit "failed" any time the UserVerifier is reset,
and user verification didn't succeed prior.
A more conceptually clear time to emit "failed" would be if
the UserVerifier is reset and user verification failed prior,
and to emit "failed" if the user cancels unlock.
This commit restructures things to do that. Aside from being
more conceptually clear, it also lays the groundwork for us
to be able to reset the unlock screen without failing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
