This commit detects when a user inserts a smartcard,
and then initiates user verification using the gdm-smartcard
PAM service.
Likewise, if a user removes their smartcard, password verification
(or the user list depending on auth mode and configuration) are initiated
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Make the lock dialog group reactive, to intercept any events
before they go to the actors below.
In the future, we may restructure our chrome to have a clear
layer system, but for now it fixes a security issue in the lock
screen (you can see the contents of the windows by dragging
if the screen was locked with the overview active)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705840
Showing the new message at full size marks an abrubt change and looks
bad. Instead, gradually animate from 0px to full natural height.
Includes hacks to workaround flickering scrollbars while the animation
is in progress.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687660
If that fails (which only ever happens in initial-setup mode, which
has no unlock or login dialog), we don't want to go ahead with
whatever we were doing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701848
If we don't remove the animation, we might leave a pending call
to _lockScreenShown() which would confuse our state tracking into
thinking we're active when we're not.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700901
Right now when a user types their password to unlock their session
we end up getting an unlock signal from GDM right away. We then
proceed to deactivate the screensaver before the user has a chance
to read his messages.
This commit makes sure we clear out the message queue before processing
the deactivation request.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704347
logind sends out an "unlock" signal separately when
verification completes and we already listen for that,
so we don't need to unlock on verification-complete, too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704347
We can't assume "isActive implies isModal", so there is a risk
of pushing a modal that nothing else will ever pop, because we
take the early return and don't activate the user active watch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700901
If the drag action ends after something else has put the screen shield
into a different state we can end up in an inconsistent screen shield
state where the whole thing is empty.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703126
Currently the clipboard's contents may leak to unauthorized parties by
pasting into the unlock dialog's password entry and unmasking the entry.
Prevent this from happening by clearing the clipboard on lock.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698922
Upon popMode, MessageTray will try readding all notifications
to their rightful parent, so we must tell NotificationBox to
relinquish them before st_bin_set_child() fails (leaving a dangling
child pointer and crashing at the next allocation)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698812
There's large performance issues with both the blur and desaturation
that make the screen shield hard to use on slower computers, and this
has always been a temporary stopgap until the user can pick a different
image for the lock screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696322
To make sure that the screen shield is shown before suspending, we
take a logind inhibitor and release it when the screen shield is
shown. As the screen shield is not only shown on suspend, we can end
up releasing the inhibitor independently from suspending (lock, idle),
in which case the screen might not be locked when we do suspend.
To fix, only release the inhibitor after showing the screen shield
when we are about to suspend.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693708
With fallback mode gone, we can no longer rely on gnome-screensaver
being installed. Rather than handling three different cases (GDM,
gnome-screensaver, no lock), disable the lock functionality when
not running under GDM.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693403
Previously, we would create one StBin per monitor, but each was positioned
at 0,0 and sized as the screen, so they would overlap and draw the box shadows
on top of the other backgrounds.
Instead, we need to size appropriately the bin, and then we need to position
the actual MetaBacgroundActor at 0,0, so add a flag to BackgroundManager
for this.
Also, get rid of MetaBackgroundGroup, they do nothing because the screenshield
is not a descendant of the MetaWindowGroup and because the widget in between
blocks the propagation of the visible region. At the same time, use a
widget, not a bin, because StBin requires you to set .child, not call add_child().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694394
St.Bin() really only expects one child at a time, and the
BackgroundManager will add two. This can cause assertion
failures when destroying one of the background actors.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694227
This commit updates the code to use mutter's new background
api, and changes the shell's startup animation to be closer
to the mockups.
Based on initial work by Giovanni Campagna
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682429
Right now we very abruptly kill the login screen
and start the users session without any transition
out.
This commit introduces a fade out of the dialog and
panels.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694062
StBoxLayout always fills on the orthogonal direction, so the icon
becomes distorted as the layout grows to accomodate more details.
Instead, use a bin that aligns at the start.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693822
The screenshield was not checking the return value of pushModal(), meaning
that it believed it was fully locked when it was not. Later, calling
popModal() would fail, causing an exception and blocking the unlock.
Now when we fail we include an explanatory message, pointing the user
to the actual cause of the issue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689106
The curtain animation looks jerky at its current speed, and more so if
we blank the screen immediately at the end. Make it a little slower and
it becomes more confortable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691964
If the screen lock is enabled, lock the screen before suspension.
When using systemd, this will cover both explicitly suspending from
the user menu and suspension initiated by g-s-d (lid close, power
button).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686482
Now that we have an explicit active-but-not-locked state, we should
use different signals to notify changes. lock-status-changed is
renamed to active-changed, and a new locked-changed is introduced.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693007
