Reroute setting those properties to a GIcon. API users are expected
to create GIcon directly now.
The advantage is that from a StIcon you can now create a similar one
by accessing :gicon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682540
StScrollBar was intercepting motion events by using captured-event on
the stage, which required additional dirty tricks, which required
additional hacks. Simplify it by just using clutter_grab_pointer()
instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671001
Add support for the CSS "background-repeat" property. Currently, this
only supports on/off, rather than allowing tiling in each individual
dimension. It is supported for both the cogl and cairo rendering paths.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680801
The :reactive property is used on StButton to like the :sensitive
property on GtkWidgets, that is, to indicate that the user is not
(yet) expected to click the button, and therefore should affect
styling too.
This allows to remove some code at the JS layer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619955
clutter_actor_get_children returns a newly allocated GList and it was
not freed.
However, as there's no reason to copy the children list, switch to
iterator api.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678406
Commit de8a66d4ce removed our own DPI handling for the one found
it Clutter, but broke resolution updates at runtime (for instance
when setting the "Large Text" option in Universal Access).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677975
This swaps a use of GLfloat for a regular float. Cogl might stop
including a GL header in its public headers soon so this would fix a
compilation error.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672711
Currently the scroll event code only handles scroll events if the
adjustment's value is within the "lower" and "upper" limits. The
likely intent was to pass events to a parent scroll view when
reaching the bounds (uh, nested scroll views!), but apparently
we never made use of this, as the upper bound is actually wrong
(an adjustment's maximum value is upper - page_size, not upper).
Just handle all scroll events unconditionally and rely on the
bound checks in StAdjustment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672413
Icon theme change signals aren't noticed immediately, they're usually
noticed when trying to load an icon. Since icon theme changes cause a
style change, and most icon widgets try to re-load their texture during
a style change, this means that we get a stack like this:
st_texture_cache_load_icon
gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon
gtk_icon_theme_changed
st_widget_style_changed
st_texture_cache_load_icon
Rather than making every place that uses StTextureCache re-entrant,
punt the notifying of icon theme changes to an idle handler instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673512
Currently compilation fails with -Werror, as we don't handle the
(newly introduced) smooth scroll events in switch statements; add
some basic support, which should make the compiler happy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672413
More than one outstanding request to the same URI should now be
deduplicated, and the framework is there if we want to cache async loaded
URIs as well
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672273
In the case that we don't have an icon corresponding to the gicon, it's
more than likely that the code calling load_gicon will know more about
what it wants as a fallback than the texture-cache itself. In fact -
we had a whole lot of dead code that would try to fall back, but never
did because we always returned a valid actor.
This was causing certain applications with invalid icons to not get the
fallback icon because an icon couldn't be found. Fix up the one place
where we don't have an explicit fallback icon codepath, and then stop
doing what we were doing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671656
This assignment was shadowed by the giant switch above. Since the
switch has a comment or two explaining the logic inside of it,
keep that instead of the assignment.
Since the invoker for navigate_focus has an extra parameter, annotations
from the invoker aren't applied on the vfunc itself. Fix that by annotating
the vfunc separately.
