A menu item activation might lead to a call to `itemActivated` which eventually
will close the menu which leads to a `PopupMenu.removeAll` that destroys all the
items, stopping the emission of the 'activate' signal for them.
Before commit 4258ae3e this was not happening because destroy'ing a javascript
object wasn't really disposing it and thus stopping the signal emissions.
So, ensure that `itemActivated` is called after that all the other callbacks
have been consumed, and so that the menu is closed as last thing.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1326https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/557
Don't use composition for PopupBaseMenuItem, but instead inherit from BoxLayout.
So remove the internal actor, making all the menu items actor themselves.
Add an actor property as fallback to avoid warnings for usage in menus.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/499
Menu items use a single 'active' state that follows both hover and
keyboard focus. It therefore makes sense for the active item to always
grab the focus, in particular as an item that is sensitive but not
focusable by keynav would be rather weird.
As it turns out, we do have a case that is weird enough where we want
exactly that, so only grab focus if the actor's :can-focus property
allows it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/171
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkDirectionType. It's bit-compatible with it,
too. All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkPolicyType. It's bit-compatible with it, too.
All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
Add exception to handle a keypress if numlock is enabled as we already do for
capslock. This uses Clutter.ModifierType.MOD2_MASK because at the moment there
is not a more explicit way to refer to the numlock mask.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/550
Pretty much like dd4709bb2, BoxPointer's show() and hide()
functions will clash with Clutter.Actor's ones.
In addition to that, on a conceptual level, the current API
is not great, because calling boxPointer.hide() won't result
in boxPointer.actor.visible == false.
For these reasons, rename show() and hide() to open() and
close(). A compatibility layer will be added in a following
commit, warning about the usage of show() and hide().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/153
Key events involved in a keyboard shortcut are not completely consumed by
Mutter. That means that if the popupMenu is bound to a shortcut (e.g.
Alt<Space>) and the user keeps the keys pressed, the same key-event will be
delivered to the popupMenu. We can workaround this issue filtering out all the
events where a a modifier is down (except capslock).
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/372
When not using arrow notation with anonymous functions, we use Lang.bind()
to bind `this` to named callbacks. However since ES5, this functionality
is already provided by Function.prototype.bind() - in fact, Lang.bind()
itself uses it when no extra arguments are specified. Just use the built-in
function directly where possible, and use arrow notation in the few places
where we pass additional arguments.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23
Commit 28ca96064b added support for setting PopupImageMenuItem's icons
via GIcons as well as via strings. However as the check whether an object
implements the GIcon interface only works on GObjects, specifying an icon
name was broken. Fix that to actually allow both strings and GIcons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789018
We are already closing top bar menus on session mode changes, but
as this behavior makes sense for any other menus as well - dash
context menus or the background menu for instance - just generalize
the behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787676
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
We are moving the icon to be added before the text instead of after,
which is consistent with other menu items in other popup menus, such
as the ones in the system indicator's popup menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782166
This allows passing an optional icon parameter to addAction()
so that a PopupImageMenuItem instance is created instead of a
PopupMenuItem if an icon is specified.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782166
Add an extra check to setIcon() so that either a GIcon or an string
with the icon's name is handlded, so that we can create menu items
in different ways (e.g. by passing a GIcon created from a resource).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782166
Generalizing menu toggling via keyboard in commit 1d58ea25ab
fixed keynav in many places, but it turns out that it also adds
unexpected interactions in some cases where the source is not
button-like, as for example the entry context menus provided by
ShellEntry. Commit e33c68a415 fixed one case, however it is still
possible for plain enter/space to unexpectedly trigger the menu
if the entry itself doesn't consume the event, which is the case
when ClutterText:editable is false. However for a general fix, it
makes more sense to consider the source actor's :reactive property
and disable toggling menus via keyboard when they cannot be toggled
by pointer either - expecting non-editable entries to be non-reactive
as well seems like a reasonable assumption, and indeed all our code
follows that pattern.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758873
commit 1d58ea25ab changed the
popupMenu code to handle key presses on source actors directly.
This fixed keynav into the session gear menu at the login screen.
Unfortunately, it also causes spurious pop ups if a modifier happens
to be held down.
This commit checks for modifiers and short circuits the up front
key handling if any are found.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740043
It overrides ::button-release-event in order to implement the
hidden/shown toggling, it must do the same on TOUCH_END, otherwise
menus stay shown on touch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756748
* switch to a one-column layout (and adjust strings/widths
accordingly
* remove separator before system menu
* add link to account settings to user submenu for consistency
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751377
When it comes to keybindings or gestures, there's not really a good
reason why popups associated with the top bar should behave differently
from any other shell menus. Just set the action mode generically for
all menus, so actions like screenshots or media-keys start working
with menus like the background- or app launcher context menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745039
So we can style it differently than :hover.
We already have a active state for the menu items which includes
more than hover. For example, when the keyboard focus moves to a item
or we select programatically a item.
For this reason we need a style class named active for the meaning we
give to it in menu items, and a pseudo class active with the meaning
CSS has.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744680
Since commit e04e507659, we will already get the right icon for the
submenu arrow, so we must not mirror it again. However we do need to
take the text direction into account for the rotation now (but that's
not actually too bad - the resulting code gets quite a bit easier).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736343
