Much of St is undocumented, aside from input/output arguments. This is
no doubt because a lot of it parallels Gtk closely, but is worth
improving since many new programmers are not familiar with Gtk.
closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2983
As the view now scrolls from right-to-left in RTL locales, the
scroll bar handle should reflect that.
Likewise the event handling needs adjusting as well: Scrolling
left should increase the adjustment value, and clicking the
trough to the left of the handle as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1318
`g_object_notify()` actually takes a global lock to look up the property
by its name, which means there is a performance hit (albeit tiny) every
time this function is called. For this reason, always try to use
`g_object_notify_by_pspec()` instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/652
Cut down on boilerplate by using the (no longer that) new helper
macros. We don't care about breaking ABI in private libraries, so
use G_DECLARE_FINAL_TYPE even where the class struct used to be
exposed in the header, except for types we inherit from ourselves
(obviously) or where the class exposes any vfuncs (where changes
could affect inheritance in extensions).
This was due to incorrect pixel clamping, which bounced the height
of the actor between values. Just remove pixel clamping, as Clutter
will correctly do it for us.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689243
StScrollBar was intercepting motion events by using captured-event on
the stage, which required additional dirty tricks, which required
additional hacks. Simplify it by just using clutter_grab_pointer()
instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671001
Currently the scroll event code only handles scroll events if the
adjustment's value is within the "lower" and "upper" limits. The
likely intent was to pass events to a parent scroll view when
reaching the bounds (uh, nested scroll views!), but apparently
we never made use of this, as the upper bound is actually wrong
(an adjustment's maximum value is upper - page_size, not upper).
Just handle all scroll events unconditionally and rely on the
bound checks in StAdjustment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672413
Currently compilation fails with -Werror, as we don't handle the
(newly introduced) smooth scroll events in switch statements; add
some basic support, which should make the compiler happy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672413
Since an StWidget now has children, it needs to allocate those children
properly. Defer to the currently installed layout manager, like Clutter
does.
Now that we have something that allocates children in St, to prevent
double allocations, we use clutter_actor_set_allocation rather than
chaining up to StWidget::allocate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Since we want to paint children by default in StWidget, we need to
provide a way for custom subclasses to paint their CSS backgrounds
without painting children... introducing st_widget_paint_background.
Additionally, remove any custom paint/pick handlers added by subclasses
of StWidget that just painted their children. This will cause double
painting if left alone.
This also removes the hacky things that some subclasses of StBin did
to prevent their one child to be painted by StBin.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
The handle was a child of the trough, but it was allocated and painted
like it was a child of the bar. This will wreak havoc when we port over
to the new Clutter API, so let's just make it a child of the bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Clutter, since version 1.8, does The Right Thing™ inside the default
implementation of ClutterActor::map and ClutterActor::unmap, even for
non-container actors: it will iterate over the list of children and
map, or unmap, each one of them, respectively.
This means that the requirement to override map and unmap for composite
actors to map and unmap the internal children has been dropped.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669239
StScrollBar was tracking whether or not it currently had a valid
allocation, but since Clutter 1.4 there is a method it can call to get
that information instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648758
If we're unmapped (or destroyed) during a scroll, we want to clean
up the changes we've made to Clutter's event handling, remove our
signal handler, and emit ::scroll-stop.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646825
* Make sure all source files have a LGPL copyright header, and standardize
non-standard variations of the header to a common form.
* Check and update all copyright notices.
* Remove 'Written By:' lines. They are universally incomplete and
typically indicate only who started a particular file.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634550
Although within St itself there are situations where the semantics of
these functions (return TRUE or FALSE and return the actual value in
an out parameter) is useful, it's mostly just annoying at the
application level, where you generally know that the CSS property is
going to specified, and there is no especially sane fallback if it's
not.
So rename the current methods to lookup_color, lookup_double, and
lookup_length, and add new get_color, get_double, and get_length
methods that don't take an "inherit" parameter, and return their
values directly. (Well, except for get_color, due to the lack of (out
caller-allocates) in gjs.)
And update the code to use either the old or new methods as appropriate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632590
It has probably crossed the line to evil by a mile or so, but here
it is: a Tweener.slowDownFactor replacement used by all animations
without exception.
While at it, update Tweener to use the new setTimeScale() upstream
function instead of adjusting the timeline directly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622249
Since style_class and pseudo_class are space-separated lists of names,
add new methods to add and remove individual names rather than just
re-setting the entire name.
Update existing code to use the new pseudo-class methods where
appropriate. In some cases, this may result in actors having multiple
pseudoclasses where previously they only had one at a time, but there
don't seem to be any visible differences.
(There are some places that could usefully use the new style_class
methods as well, but this patch doesn't change them.)
Also, update test-theme.c to test the new methods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604943
The relationship between adjustments and scrollbars and
scrollable widgets was much more complex than it needed to be.
StScrollView: Have the scroll view own a pair of adjustments,
set them on the child on add(), remove unnecessary
change notification signal connections.
StBoxLayout: Remove auto-create of adjustments, just take the
adjustments from the scrollbars and set them on the scrollable
child. Notify for hadjustment/vadjustment properties.
StScrollBar: Notify adjustment property.
StScrollable: Document how adjustment setting works.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611740
When an StScrollView is allocated, allocating the child would
cause the adjustment values to change, which would result in
the scrollbars queueing a relayout, which isn't allowed during
allocation.
To avoid this, instead of queueing a relayout when the adjustment
changes:
- When we have a valid allocation already, just go ahead
and reallocate the children.
- Otherwise do nothing immediately and wait until we get allocated
Because the 'needs_allocation' flag in ClutterActor isn't exposed,
this requires some slightly ugly code to shadow that state locally.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611944
StScrollBar: Be robust against being disposed multiple times,
which can happen, and in fact, normally happens when destroying
the parent.
StScrollView: Implement remove() for the hscroll and vscroll members,
and just destroy them in dispose() and let them be removed.
unparent the shadows, instead of just unref'ing them directly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611203
The forward/backward steppers are always allocated a square region at the
scroll bar's ends. Change the allocation to be based on the steppers' size
requests instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609401
Rather than repeating the computation of borders in many different
widget subclasses, add helper functions:
st_theme_node_adjust_for_height()
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_width()
st_theme_node_adjust_for_width()
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_height()
st_theme_node_get_content_box()
That are used in get_preferred_width()/get_preferred_height() and
allocate() methods to consistently apply the necessary adjustments.
This allows removing the StPadding type.
Queueing a relayout when the borders/padding change is moved from
st_widget_real_style_changed() to the invoking code to allow access
to the old StThemeNode for comparison. (Should this be added as
a parameter to the signal?)
Borders are included in the geometry adjustments, but borders
are not yet drawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595993
