We are moving the icon to be added before the text instead of after,
which is consistent with other menu items in other popup menus, such
as the ones in the system indicator's popup menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782166
This allows passing an optional icon parameter to addAction()
so that a PopupImageMenuItem instance is created instead of a
PopupMenuItem if an icon is specified.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782166
Add an extra check to setIcon() so that either a GIcon or an string
with the icon's name is handlded, so that we can create menu items
in different ways (e.g. by passing a GIcon created from a resource).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782166
Generalizing menu toggling via keyboard in commit 1d58ea25ab
fixed keynav in many places, but it turns out that it also adds
unexpected interactions in some cases where the source is not
button-like, as for example the entry context menus provided by
ShellEntry. Commit e33c68a415 fixed one case, however it is still
possible for plain enter/space to unexpectedly trigger the menu
if the entry itself doesn't consume the event, which is the case
when ClutterText:editable is false. However for a general fix, it
makes more sense to consider the source actor's :reactive property
and disable toggling menus via keyboard when they cannot be toggled
by pointer either - expecting non-editable entries to be non-reactive
as well seems like a reasonable assumption, and indeed all our code
follows that pattern.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758873
commit 1d58ea25ab changed the
popupMenu code to handle key presses on source actors directly.
This fixed keynav into the session gear menu at the login screen.
Unfortunately, it also causes spurious pop ups if a modifier happens
to be held down.
This commit checks for modifiers and short circuits the up front
key handling if any are found.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740043
It overrides ::button-release-event in order to implement the
hidden/shown toggling, it must do the same on TOUCH_END, otherwise
menus stay shown on touch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756748
* switch to a one-column layout (and adjust strings/widths
accordingly
* remove separator before system menu
* add link to account settings to user submenu for consistency
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751377
When it comes to keybindings or gestures, there's not really a good
reason why popups associated with the top bar should behave differently
from any other shell menus. Just set the action mode generically for
all menus, so actions like screenshots or media-keys start working
with menus like the background- or app launcher context menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745039
So we can style it differently than :hover.
We already have a active state for the menu items which includes
more than hover. For example, when the keyboard focus moves to a item
or we select programatically a item.
For this reason we need a style class named active for the meaning we
give to it in menu items, and a pseudo class active with the meaning
CSS has.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744680
Since commit e04e507659, we will already get the right icon for the
submenu arrow, so we must not mirror it again. However we do need to
take the text direction into account for the rotation now (but that's
not actually too bad - the resulting code gets quite a bit easier).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736343
When you open or close a PopupSubMenu the arrow icon rotates, but
the code previously assumed that the starting angle was a multiple
of 90. If you click the submenu fast enough the rotation could overlap
with the previous rotation and you'd get something that wasn't a multiple
of 90.
Now we ensure that the ending arrowRotation angle is always a multiple
of 90 regardless of what the starting angle is.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728927
The code from PanelMenu.Button assumed menus would open below their
source actor, making KEY_Down a good choice; however with the new
generic code, we should base the key used on the actual menu position.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735614
The behavior of opening/closing/navigating a menu from its source
actor is generic enough to not limit it to PanelMenu.Buttons, so
move the code into PopupMenu itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735614
The optional label support introduced in commit af063dc2f2 broke
the centering of separators, as the label still adds additional
spacing even when empty.
Properly hide the label actor in that case to fix the alignment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730753
Until now the arrows were the associated arrow
character of the font. This cause some problems like
different arrows for different fonts, and size can be
altered because of the font size.
To solve that, use an image for the arrows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720206
Currently the animation of the arrows doesn't take
into account previous rotation.
Since in a incoming patch we will use one arrow
and rotate it to generate the four directions, we
need that the animation use relative rotation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720206
Currently destroying a menu's actor and calling its destroy() method
are subtly different - the latter will also result in the menu being
removed from the corresponding menu manager.
There is no good justification for that behavior, so make both actions
behave the same.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724690
Since the agregate menu does 120% of font-size, make this
for all dropdown arrows in gnome-shell and rename the css
class to make clear that it is used in overall gnome-shell
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709564
Before, separators naively checked whether their siblings were visible
using actor visibility. However, if section actors are visible but have
no visible children, this will fail. Special-case separators when doing
visiblity checks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707801
Triangles should be flipped in RTL. This is the easiest way to do it that
doesn't rely on modifying the rotating logic, though it is a bit hacky since
the ClutterActor "scale-x" property technically considers the lower bound
to be 0. It works, though.
When the triangle rotates (when sub-menu is expanded), it seems as if
the triangle pivots from one corner even though rotation center is set
to Clutter.Gravity.CENTER. Hence the rotation center is set nearer to
the edge than to the corner ([0.3, 0.5] instead of [0.5, 0.5]) so that
it doesn't appear odd.
Also pivot_point is used instead of rotation_center_z_gravity as it is
deprecated.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703109
This code is too complicated to keep, and the last straw came after the
fixed width menu in the aggregate menu design.
This will break some existing popup menus that rely on the fixed width,
but this will soon be replaced with the aggregate menu. We'll also soon
clean this up further by replacing PopupBaseMenuItem's custom layout code
with an StBoxLayout.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
We need to make sure that we reset the opened submenu when we close the
submenu, not trick the toplevel into thinking a closed submenu is the
currently opened menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704336
This way, if a parent is insensitive, all children will be, too.
Though PopupSubMenus will be forced closed, PopupMenuSection needs
the propagation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702539
Doing it at the end has confusing semantics, especially as there is
this point where isOpen is true, but the corresponding open-state-changed
has not been emitted.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702539
Use ClutterActor.allocate_align_fill() so we don't have to do
this math ourselves. At the same time, clean up the RTL handling
so that it's easier to follow.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702539
It seems this behavior at one time was intentional, but I (along with
the designers) think it looks ugly having the menu having its insides
shrinking and shifting around while fading out of existence.
There's two cases where we currently explicitly try to animate the
submenu closed -- when an item is clicked inside the submenu, and
when the toplevel closes. This removes both of those.
The user expectation is that submenus will be closed the next time the
toplevel is open even if they were open before, so force submenus closed
when the toplevel finishes fading out, without any animation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702539
As the aggregate menu will be built out of sections from each
of the menus, we need to ensure that activating an item in one
of these sections can close the main menu, even when it is not
a menu item. The new API also needs to be flexible enough to
ensure that animations can be controlled, like the buttons that
lock the screen or launch a new session.
Port the user menu to use this new API as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702539
While the default style works well will a solid handle, using both
border and fill color would be desirable in classic mode. Add the
necessary (optional) style properties to allow this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697917
Since commit c84dc6254d, popup menus are closed automatically
when another menu opens (to catch the case where a menu is opened
by keyboard shortcut, which wasn't handled before). However in the
case of child menus, both child and parent are expected to be visible,
so handle this case explicitly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699678
We already do this when navigating between menus via mouse or
keynav, but miss cases where a menu is opened by other means,
for instance via a keyboard shortcut.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686756
Currently all keybindings are disabled while some popup menu is open.
However some keybindings may still be useful in some cases, so expose
GrabHelper's modal params parameter to allow specifying a keybinding
mode for particular menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698938
This simplifies the code required to build remote menus and
put all the items in the right place, and makes us share our
implementation with GTK+.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698427
This makes it easy to replace the dot with another label in the future.
Change the allocation logic, as text layout is more complicated than
simple icon logic.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698427
