When scrolled, st_box_layout_apply_transform() includes the scroll
offset and affects paint volumes. This is right for our children, but
our paint volume is determined by our allocation and borders and
doesn't scroll, so we need to reverse-compensate, the same as we do
when painting.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630932
* Make sure all source files have a LGPL copyright header, and standardize
non-standard variations of the header to a common form.
* Check and update all copyright notices.
* Remove 'Written By:' lines. They are universally incomplete and
typically indicate only who started a particular file.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634550
Although within St itself there are situations where the semantics of
these functions (return TRUE or FALSE and return the actual value in
an out parameter) is useful, it's mostly just annoying at the
application level, where you generally know that the CSS property is
going to specified, and there is no especially sane fallback if it's
not.
So rename the current methods to lookup_color, lookup_double, and
lookup_length, and add new get_color, get_double, and get_length
methods that don't take an "inherit" parameter, and return their
values directly. (Well, except for get_color, due to the lack of (out
caller-allocates) in gjs.)
And update the code to use either the old or new methods as appropriate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632590
Add StContainer, which implements the ClutterContainer interface based
on the container methods in st-private and make the existing containers
subclass it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613907
Paint/pick all children, regardless of whether or not they lie within
the content_box. The previous behavior was that a child that was 99%
outside the box would be fully visible, but a child that was 100%
outside the box would be fully hidden. This is somewhat odd, and
doesn't match the behavior of the other St container classes, and at
any rate, the use of clutter_actor_get_allocation_box() for this
optimization was incorrect since it doesn't take into account
transformations (anchor point, rotation, etc) that might cause the
child to be drawn within the content_box anyway.
(For scrolled StBoxLayouts, drawing is still clipped to the
content_box, as before, but will now properly take transformations
into account as well.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
The relationship between adjustments and scrollbars and
scrollable widgets was much more complex than it needed to be.
StScrollView: Have the scroll view own a pair of adjustments,
set them on the child on add(), remove unnecessary
change notification signal connections.
StBoxLayout: Remove auto-create of adjustments, just take the
adjustments from the scrollbars and set them on the scrollable
child. Notify for hadjustment/vadjustment properties.
StScrollBar: Notify adjustment property.
StScrollable: Document how adjustment setting works.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611740
StScrollable: Document how to set adjustments
StBoxLayout: Make sure that we always have upper >= lower + page_size,
so that clamping works properly. Set the page_increment to be slightly
less than the page_size so there is some overlap, as is customary.
StScrollView: Remove unnecessary fabs() calls, rewrite expressions
for additional clarity.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611740
- Fix existing typos and spacing problems
- Get preferred height, not current height, of shadows
- Let shadows overflow don't clamp them when we have too little space
- Remove a now-unecessary stray MAX()
- Fix up scrollview visibility for the pathological case of no child
- Disconnect from adjustments on remove()
- Don't unset the adjustments on the child on remove(), since they
already existed or were autocreated on add()
(We should what we are doing and set the adjustments of the
scrollbars on the child rather than setting the adjustments of
the child, so we match GTK+'s scrolllable interface, but this
at least makes it consistent instead of a weird mix.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611740
StScrollable: Document how size negotation now works between the
parent and scrollable child.
StBoxLayout: Adapt to the new contract for how size negotiation
works; in particular, handle being allocated less than the
minimum size when scrolled and treat the minimum size as the
size of the scrolled area in instead of the natural size.
StScrollView: Substantially rewrite with fixes including:
- Implement new size negotation contract; this allows us
to determine scrollbar visibility without having to
connect to the adjustment.
- Implement all ALWAYS along with the existing NEVER/AUTO
- When hiding and showing scrollbars and shadows, don't
hide and show widgets, just turn on and off including them
in pick and paint. This avoids queueing relayouts.
- Cleanups for the code for connecting to adjustments,
for changing policy, and for turning on and off shadows.
scroll-view-sizing.js: New test case for StScrollView, allowing
resizing the scroll view interactively, changing the scrollbar
policies and turning shadows on and off.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611740
- Specify a minimum version of clutter-1.2.0
- Switch clutter branch in the moduleset to master
- Replace deprecated cogl_texture/material_unref() with
cogl_handle_unref()
- Use cogl_clip_push_rectangle() rather than cogl_clip_push()
- Replace cogl_check_extension() with strstr - should be
accurate enough.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610679
In StBin, StBoxLayout, and StTable, if a child has a potential
allocation that is larger than its preferred size, we give it its
preferred size instead. However, the corresponding
get_preferred_height/width methods were not making the same
assumption, which meant that if we had more width than the widget
wanted, we would allocate it its preferred width, but with the height
that corresponded to the larger width.
Fix this by defining new helpers _st_actor_get_preferred_width() and
_st_actor_get_preferred_height() and using them everywhere. Also, make
StBin and StTable use _st_allocate_fill() rather than having
nearly-identical duplicate copies of the code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609848
In a variety of places we're using boxes as data-modeling displays,
and in doing so we often want to either remove the children or
explictly destroy them.
Now ideally Gjs would support callbacks, and this would make using
the for_each functions possible, but even then these functions
are more efficient and shorter to type, at least.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600734
ClutterGroup calls _destroy, but most of St was just calling _unparent.
This caused problems because the DESTROY signal was not emitted
for child elements after destroying a toplevel. Also, in a GC'd
binding it would cause unpredictable lifetime of children.
Some St widgets simply didn't have _dispose at all; implement it.
Note because of the usage of the background_image in StButton,
we can't cleanly destroy it inside the StWidget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597845
Remove the StBoxLayout:spacing GObject property, and instead make
BoxLayout look up the spacing from the CSS style. This makes it
consistent with padding and will allow the use of units. (The
removal of the GObject property entirely instead of making it an
override is consistent with how we handle color, font, padding, etc.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596803
StBoxLayout: Make consistent that the area scrolled and clipped
to is the content area (excluding borders and padding.) Translate
back appropriately when chaining up so that the parent background
is drawn at the right place and picking on the box (if it's reactive)
picks at the right place on the screen.
clip-to-allocation is removed from StScrollView since it's just
not right - if the child has any non-moving elements, like headers or
borders, it will need to set a narrower clip. And even if the entire
child scrolls, we want to clip to an arrow that excludes the scrollbars.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595997
When a StBoxLayout is allocated a size less than its natural size,
think "shrink" needs to be divided among the children that have
a smaller minimum size than natural size.
This is done by preferentially shrinking the children that are most
expanded from their minimum size and then increasing that set of
children until we've found enough total shrink.
A new method is used of allocating children at integral sizes - instead
of rounding the per-child extra amount to an integer (which causes
cumulative round-off errors), compute the position as we go along in
floats and round individually for each child widget.
Extend the box-layout test to include of a test of a box being set
to various widths, starting quite narrow.
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6311https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595995
If the actor isn't in a stage, then setting up the adjustment
based on the actor's size (which we can't compute) and the
size of the default stage (which isn't relevant), doesn't make
sense. Just use arbitrary default values.
The adjustments will be updated to reasonable values when first
the box is first allocated.
It's not entirely clear to me why we ever want to compute the
adjustment settings this way; perhaps we should always use
default values.
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595996
Rather than repeating the computation of borders in many different
widget subclasses, add helper functions:
st_theme_node_adjust_for_height()
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_width()
st_theme_node_adjust_for_width()
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_height()
st_theme_node_get_content_box()
That are used in get_preferred_width()/get_preferred_height() and
allocate() methods to consistently apply the necessary adjustments.
This allows removing the StPadding type.
Queueing a relayout when the borders/padding change is moved from
st_widget_real_style_changed() to the invoking code to allow access
to the old StThemeNode for comparison. (Should this be added as
a parameter to the signal?)
Borders are included in the geometry adjustments, but borders
are not yet drawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595993
To each .c and .h file, add:
/* -*- mode: C; c-file-style: "gnu"; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*- */
'gnu' is the default anyways for Emacs, but indent-tabs-mode is not,
so this sets things up to correspond to the policy of no-tabs.
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6467
