We currently assume that window state changes are accompanied by an
allocation change (triggered for example by the minimize animation).
However this misses the case where a window actor is simply hidden
without any transition, as is the case with the 'show-desktop' action
for instance, so start tracking plain visibility changes as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783975
The .solid style isn't supposed to apply for modes that don't support
windows, but for this to work we have to update the style on session
mode changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783202
The solid black top bar we currently use works well for maximized
or tiled windows, as it puts focus on the application content by
blending into the monitor bezel. However it also visually reduces
the screen space, which is particularly noticeable when no window
is located nearby. Having the top bar blend with the background is
a better option in that case, so track window positions and add
some transparency when the top bar is free-floating.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747163
The display configuration now exposes a setting to automatically
shift the display color at nighttime. As there are cases where
disabling the filtering temporarily is useful, it makes sense to
expose the feature in the system menu for quick access.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741224
Some labels in the system status menu - namely network names - are out
of our control, and may thus grow the width "infinitively" unless we
restrict the menu width. So far we have been doing this by setting a
fixed width or max-width, but any value we put there might end up
being too restrictive in some locales. Instead, request a width that
fits all the labels we want to show unellipsized and use that instead
of an arbitrary limit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708472
While the GtkSettings::gtk-shell-shows-app-menu property is meant to
reflect a desktop capability (i.e. in the GNOME case: the app menu is
shown in the top bar), it is possible for users to overwrite it.
Respect the setting and actually hide the menu in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745919
Refer to the system menu in the top bar as "System" rather than "Settings" as
it contains more than just settings and "Settings" is already used for the
settings panel. "System" is also used elsewhere, so include context for
translators.
* switch to a one-column layout (and adjust strings/widths
accordingly
* remove separator before system menu
* add link to account settings to user submenu for consistency
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751377
Commit 08690d658f generalized the banner-blocking behavior of the
dateMenu to all menus that would obscure the banner. However setting
up the 'open-state-changed' handler only when an indicator is added
does not work for indicators that change their entire menu (like the
app menu) - we currently end up with menus with no connected signal
handler, and throw an error when trying to disconnect an invalid
signal ID.
To address this, add a new PanelButton::menu-set signal and use that
to set up the 'open-state-changed' handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
We currently block banners while the time+date menu is open, as it
would obscure the notification. However it is not necessarily the
only menu for which this is the case, so generalize the behavior
to all menus that would overlap banners when open.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
As notifications appear in the time+date dropdown's message list, there's
a strong relationship between notification banners and the menu. However
while the time+date menu is centered by default, which matches the banner
position, its actual position depends on the session mode - in particular
it is moved to the right in classic mode.
Reinforce the relationship in these cases by moving notification banners
underneath the time+date menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
When it comes to keybindings or gestures, there's not really a good
reason why popups associated with the top bar should behave differently
from any other shell menus. Just set the action mode generically for
all menus, so actions like screenshots or media-keys start working
with menus like the background- or app launcher context menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745039
We will soon replace regular menu items in the calendar drop-down
with more complex elements.
However there will still be items that should close the drop down
when activated - rather than making the menu available throughout
the hierarchy (and eventually from outside as well when we add the
notifications list), have a public method on a global object just
like the ubiquitous Main.overview.hide().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744817
Using a separate property to show when the application is busy rather
than cramming it into the state property makes the code clearer. In most
places we only care if an app is running or not, not whether it is
actually busy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736492
Both Panel.ActivitiesButton and its parent class Panel.MenuButton would
attempt to connect their own _onEvent() function to Clutter::event,
which counterintuitively was connecting the child class' _onEvent()
function twice.
So, actually chain up on the signal handler, and don't connect twice
to the signal. Both methods were calling this.menu.close(), so only
do that on the parent class handler, since we're chaining up and doing
the right thing now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733840
Until now the arrows were the associated arrow
character of the font. This cause some problems like
different arrows for different fonts, and size can be
altered because of the font size.
To solve that, use an image for the arrows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720206
Now that we are indicating 'geolocation in use' to user, we better also
provide at least a way to disable geolocation. Once this is in place, we
can provide slightly better controls rather than simply on/off switch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723684
Since the agregate menu does 120% of font-size, make this
for all dropdown arrows in gnome-shell and rename the css
class to make clear that it is used in overall gnome-shell
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709564
When we show(), we need to make sure that the hiding animation
doesn't reach the end, otherwise we would hide the actor but
still have _visible = true.
We were relying on tweener overwriting to do this, but it
doesn't quite work, so better be explicit and do it ourselves.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707814
This will replace the indicator painted on the stage right now.
This unfortunately does not work for the recorder triggered by the
keybinding -- we'll simply replace the in-shell code with a keybinding
powered by gnome-settings-daemon.
The existing app menu was a kludge of legacy code that tried to manage
a bunch of state, and had a number of issues:
* It didn't properly manage visibility when combined with multiple
apps and the overview.
* It didn't properly manage reactivity when tabbing away from a busy
app to another app.
* It didn't properly disconnect signals when going from one app
to nothing.
and countless others. Rewrite it to use the new "sync" code pattern,
where we centralize all state management and do transitions from that,
rather than strange and quirky control flow.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705898
To align the arrows, we need to allocate panel buttons the full
height of the tray. Fix up all of the panel buttons to support this,
and align the arrows in the middle.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
Swap out the implementation of SystemIndicator with a dummy,
and build the aggregate menu. At the same time, remove the
poweroff and login screen menus, as those were fake aggregate
menus beforehand.
We lose some flexibility as we lose session-mode-based menu
layout, but as each component of the aggregate menu is supposed
to be "smart" in response to updating itself when session
state changes, I believe it's better than a declarative model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
