ClutterEffects are responsible for queueing redraws when their
properties change (and StScrollViewFade is a good citizen already), also
Clutter itself should queue a redraw when adding/removing an effect.
Users of Clutter should never have to queue redraws themselves (unless
they're implementing a custom ClutterEffect or ClutterContent), so don't
queue a redraw here.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2189>
The fade effect can also be added to the scroll view programatically
instead of using CSS via the st_scroll_view_update_fade_effect() API.
We make use of this API in the appDisplay, but since commit ba547ec1d
the fade margins get overridden to 0.0 from the ::style-changed handler.
Fix this by only setting the fade margins when CSS actually defines a
custom vfade/hfade offset.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/5079
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2189>
We are now consistently calling notify() when a property does change.
With that we can opt out of g_object_set()'s implicit change notifications,
so that notify is only emitted when a property *actually* changes.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2168>
Since we correctly call the `style_changed` vfunc superclass at the end
of our own function anyway, the style changes will get propagated to the
children of the scrollView inside `st_widget_real_style_changed` anyway.
So remove those unneeded and quite expensive (because they cause the
theme node to be regenerated) calls to `st_widget_style_changed`.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/953>
This will be needed for fine tuning of the visible area for appGrid
navigation purposes. We most nominally can let it happen via CSS as
the size calculations happen on size allocate, so we want to avoid
triggering relayouts while adapting to the given size.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1630>
Instead of taking just vertical/horizontal offsets, take a ClutterMargin
to allow us set the fade offsets on each direction specifically. Also,
handle negative values in margins, the fade effect will run in the negative
space left by the scrollview padding instead. Another difference now is
that areas outside the extents of the effect will be transparent, instead
of the effect ending abruptly past the given extents.
This will be used by the app grid, in order to selectively let see either
of next/prev pages while navigating.
While at it, fix code style issues in st_scroll_view_update_fade_effect(),
and clean up unused variables from the GLSL code.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1630>
Much of St is undocumented, aside from input/output arguments. This is
no doubt because a lot of it parallels Gtk closely, but is worth
improving since many new programmers are not familiar with Gtk.
closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2983
While still leaving them unused, pass around ClutterPaintContext and
ClutterPickContext when painting and picking.
The reason for splitting this change up in two is to make it possible to
bisect easier in between the API change and the change to using the
framebuffer passed around with the temporary contexts.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/827
`g_object_notify()` actually takes a global lock to look up the property
by its name, which means there is a performance hit (albeit tiny) every
time this function is called. For this reason, always try to use
`g_object_notify_by_pspec()` instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/652
In `st`, we can do this by using `ST_PARAM_*`. In the other code files,
just use `G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS` directly.
This is just a minor convenience to prevent a few unnecessary string
copies.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/646
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkPolicyType. It's bit-compatible with it, too.
All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
And constrain it in StScrollView instead (instead of falling back to an
infinite paint volume, as the actor as paint/pick impls, but no
corresponding get_paint_volume one).
Fixes artifacts with the AppView (and possibly other places) when paint
volumes are aggressively cached.
GTK+ added a new PolicyType which currently triggers compiler warnings
about unhandled values in switch statements. We also have a use case for
it already, so add support for the new policy type.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739379
Commit cfecd063c9ca3d18cd changed the allocation logic to not allocate
scrollbars when the *_visible booleans are false. This breaks the
fade effect as well as the NEVER policy. We do not paint scrollbars
when they are not supposed to be visible, so not allocating them
and thus leaving them in a "needs allocation" state just causes problems.
I am not convinced that it solved any problem to begin with (we don't paint
them anyway).
As the previous condition has basically always been true, just do it
unconditionally.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705664
We don't set :visible on the scrollbars, but use booleans to track
if they are visible. Thus check the booleans instead of the actor's
properties when allocating the scrollbars.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704265
If enabled, scrollbars take away from the allocation given to the
view's content. This is usually preferrable to painting the bars on
top of the content, but there are exceptions, for instance when the
content needs to be centered with regard to the view as a whole.
Add a :overlay-scrollbars property to account for those cases.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694261
The code here before was added as dummy code to satisfy an error
in the missing switch, and wasn't ever tested due to the lack of XI2
in mutter. Use the same math as GtkRange does to calculate scroll bar
positions from raw XI2 deltas to allow for proper smooth scrolling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687573
Currently the scroll event code only handles scroll events if the
adjustment's value is within the "lower" and "upper" limits. The
likely intent was to pass events to a parent scroll view when
reaching the bounds (uh, nested scroll views!), but apparently
we never made use of this, as the upper bound is actually wrong
(an adjustment's maximum value is upper - page_size, not upper).
Just handle all scroll events unconditionally and rely on the
bound checks in StAdjustment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672413
Currently compilation fails with -Werror, as we don't handle the
(newly introduced) smooth scroll events in switch statements; add
some basic support, which should make the compiler happy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672413
This assignment was shadowed by the giant switch above. Since the
switch has a comment or two explaining the logic inside of it,
keep that instead of the assignment.
Since an StWidget now has children, it needs to allocate those children
properly. Defer to the currently installed layout manager, like Clutter
does.
Now that we have something that allocates children in St, to prevent
double allocations, we use clutter_actor_set_allocation rather than
chaining up to StWidget::allocate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Since we want to paint children by default in StWidget, we need to
provide a way for custom subclasses to paint their CSS backgrounds
without painting children... introducing st_widget_paint_background.
Additionally, remove any custom paint/pick handlers added by subclasses
of StWidget that just painted their children. This will cause double
painting if left alone.
This also removes the hacky things that some subclasses of StBin did
to prevent their one child to be painted by StBin.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Theme authors now have the power (and responsibility) of creating fade
effects with the new CSS length property '-st-fade-offset'. A value of
0 disables the effect.
This new CSS approach replaces the current programmatic toggle of
the 'vfade' property. A new CSS style class name 'vfade' is used as
a replacement for the old property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651813
